Reliability and validity of the ultrasound technique to measure the rectus femoris muscle diameter in older CAD-patients

Tom Thomaes, Martine Thomis, Steven Onkelinx, Walter Coudyzer, Véronique Cornelissen, Luc Vanhees, Tom Thomaes, Martine Thomis, Steven Onkelinx, Walter Coudyzer, Véronique Cornelissen, Luc Vanhees

Abstract

Background: The increasing age of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and the occurrence of sarcopenia in the elderly population accompanied by 'fear of moving' and hospitalization in these patients often results in a substantial loss of skeletal muscle mass and muscle strength. Cardiac rehabilitation can improve exercise tolerance and muscle strength in CAD patients but less data describe eventual morphological muscular changes possibly by more difficult access to imaging techniques. Therefore the aim of this study is to assess and quantify the reliability and validity of an easy applicable method, the ultrasound (US) technique, to measure the diameter of rectus femoris muscle in comparison to the muscle dimensions measured with CT scans.

Methods: 45 older CAD patients without cardiac event during the last 9 months were included in this study. 25 patients were tested twice with ultrasound with a two day interval to assess test-retest reliability and 20 patients were tested twice (once with US and once with CT) on the same day to assess the validity of the US technique compared to CT as the gold standard. Isometric and isokinetic muscle testing was performed to test potential zero-order correlations between muscle diameter, muscle volume and muscle force.

Results: An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97 ((95%CL: 0.92 - 0.99) was found for the test-retest reliability of US and the ICC computed between US and CT was 0.92 (95%CL: 0.81 - 0.97). The absolute difference between both techniques was 0.01 ± 0.12 cm (p = 0.66) resulting in a typical percentage error of 4.4%. Significant zero-order correlations were found between local muscle volume and muscle diameter assessed with CT (r = 0.67, p = 0.001) and assessed with US (r = 0.49, p < 0.05). Muscle strength parameters were also significantly correlated with muscle diameter assessed with both techniques (range r = 0.45-r = 0.61, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Ultrasound imaging can be used as a valid and reliable measurement tool to assess the rectus femoris muscle diameter in older CAD patients.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image of the rectus femoris with indication of the diameter, obtained with ultrasound imaging.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland-Altman plot for the difference between CT scan and Ultrasound for the rectus femoris diameter. CT: CT-Scan measurement, US: Ultrasound measurement of Rectus femoris. Full 'bold' line: average difference between CT and US. Broken line: limits of agreement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bland-Altman plot for the difference between both US measurements for the RF diameter. US1: Ultrasound measurement 1, US2: Ultrasound measurement 2. Full 'bold' line: average difference between Ultrasound measurement 1 and 2. Broken line: limits of agreement.

References

    1. World Health Organization. The top ten cause of death.
    1. Metter EJ, Talbot LA, Schrager M, Conwit R. Skeletal muscle strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:B359–B365. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.10.B359.
    1. Rantanen T. Muscle strength, disability and mortality. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13:3–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00298.x.
    1. Rantanen T, Harris T, Leveille SG, Visser M, Foley D, Masaki K, Guralnik JM. Muscle strength and body mass index as long-term predictors of mortality in initially healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M168–M173. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.3.M168.
    1. Ghroubi S, Chaari M, Elleuch H, Massmoudi K, Abdenadher M, Trabelssi I, Akrout M, Feki H, Frikha I, Dammak J, Kammoun S, Zouari N, Elleuch MH. The isokinetic assessment of peripheral muscle function in patients with coronary artery disease: correlations with cardiorespiratory capacity. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007;50:295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.03.012.
    1. Sumide T, Shimada K, Ohmura H, Onishi T, Kawakami K, Masaki Y, Fukao K, Nishitani M, Kume A, Sato H, Sunayama S, Kawai S, Shimada A, Yamamoto T, Kikuchi K, Amano A, Daida H. Relationship between exercise tolerance and muscle strength following cardiac rehabilitation: comparison of patients after cardiac surgery and patients with myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2009;54:273–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.05.016.
    1. Kida K, Osada N, Akashi YJ, Sekizuka H, Omiya K, Miyake F. The exercise training effects of skeletal muscle strength and muscle volume to improve functional capacity in patients with myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2008;129:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.04.031.
    1. de Bruin PF, Ueki J, Watson A, Pride NB. Size and strength of the respiratory and quadriceps muscles in patients with chronic asthma. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:59–64. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10010059.
    1. Seymour JM, Ward K, Sidhu PS, Puthucheary Z, Steier J, Jolley CJ, Rafferty G, Polkey MI, Moxham J. Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD. Thorax. 2009;64:418–423. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.103986.
    1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: usesin assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull. 1979;86:420–428.
    1. Bemben MG. Use of diagnostic ultrasound for assessing muscle size. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16:103–108.
    1. Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Tsunoda N, Fukunaga T. Crosssectional areas of fat and muscles in limbs during growth and middle age. Int J Sports Med. 1994;15:420–425. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021081.
    1. Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Narici MV. Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91:116–118. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0961-9.
    1. Delaney S, Worsley P, Warner M, Taylor M, Stokes M. Assessing contractile ability of the quadriceps muscle using ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve. 2010;42:530–538. doi: 10.1002/mus.21725.
    1. Arts IM, Pillen S, Schelhaas HJ, Overeem S, Zwarts MJ. Normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasonography in adults. Muscle Nerve. 2010;41:32–41. doi: 10.1002/mus.21458.
    1. Nogueira W, Gentil P, Mello SN, Oliveira RJ, Bezerra AJ, Bottaro M. Effects of power training on muscle thickness of older men. Int J Sports Med. 2009;30:200–204. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1104584.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する