A comparison of the characteristics of iOS and Android users of a smoking cessation app

Harveen Kaur Ubhi, Daniel Kotz, Susan Michie, Onno C P van Schayck, Robert West, Harveen Kaur Ubhi, Daniel Kotz, Susan Michie, Onno C P van Schayck, Robert West

Abstract

iOS and Android smartphone users may differ in ways that affect their use and likelihood of success when using a smoking cessation application (app). If so, it may be necessary to take the device type (iOS and Android) into account when designing smoking cessation apps and in studies evaluating app effectiveness. How do socio-demographic and smoking characteristics, potentially relevant to engagement and cessation outcomes, of the SF28 app users differ between those using the iOS version and those using the Android version? Data were collected between October 2013 and April 2015. The variables measured were age, gender, social grade, time since the most recent quit attempt, choice of medication use (nicotine replacement therapy or varenicline), weekly expenditure on cigarettes, cigarettes smoked per day, reason for using the app and quit date set. The alpha was set to p < 0.006 to adjust for multiple comparisons. A total of 1368 users were included in the analysis. iOS and Android device users were similar in terms of age, social grade, weekly expenditure on cigarettes and cigarettes smoked per day. Compared with Android users, iOS users were more likely to have downloaded the app for a serious quit attempt (74.3 versus 69.6%, p = 0.001), made a quit attempt within the last 12 months (59.6 versus 45.9%, p < 0.001) and set their quit date on the day of registration (61 versus 46.2%, p < 0.001). They were less likely to have used stop-smoking medication to support their quit attempt (31.5 versus 48.6%, p < 0.001). Differences between smokers using the iOS version of smoking cessation apps and those using the Android version may influence quit success.

Keywords: Android; Apps; Characteristics; Mobile; SF28; Smartphone; Smoking cessation; iOS.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

Harveen Kaur Ubhi and Susan Michie declare that they have no conflict of interest. Robert West and Onno C.P. van Schayck have undertaken research and consultancy for companies that develop and manufacture smoking cessation medications. Daniel Kotz received an unrestricted grant from Pfizer for a smoking cessation trial.

Ethical standards

All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Informed consent

Electronic informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethical approval was granted by the University College London Ethics Committee.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screenshots of the SF28 app. a Homescreen of the SF28 app. b App advising about the use of stop-smoking medication. c App includes inspirational statements to bolster positive motivation. d App advising on how to help cope with cravings when they occur (inbuilt distraction game). e App advising on how to make changes to lifestyle to reduce exposure to smoking triggers

References

    1. Ubhi H, Michie S, Kotz D, Wong W, West R. Preliminary evaluation of SF28—a mobile application to aid smoking cessation. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17(1):e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3479.
    1. Bricker, J. B., Mull, K. E., Kientz, J. A., Vilardaga, R., Mercer, L. D., Akioka, K. J., et al. (2014). Randomized, controlled pilot trial of a smartphone app for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 143, 87–94. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.006.
    1. International data corporation. Smartphone OS market share, Q1 2015. 2014. URL: (accessed 10–08-2014).
    1. Droid vs. iOS. Battle of the ops. 2011. URL: (accessed 02–06-2015).
    1. iOS users spend more of their time using apps compared to Android users. 2013. URL: (accessed 12–08-2014).
    1. Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Michie, S., Atkins, L., West, R. The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. 2014. ISBN-13: 978-1291846058 .
    1. Eysenck, H. J. A. (1941). Critical and experimental study of colour preferences. American Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 385–394.
    1. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
    1. Berlyne DE, editor. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1974.
    1. Crozier, R. (1994). Manufactured pleasures: psychological responses to design. Manchester University Press.
    1. Reid, J. L., Hammond, D., Boudreau, C., Fong, G. T., et al; ITC Collaboration (2010). Socioeconomic disparities in quit intentions, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence among smokers in four western countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq051.
    1. Li L, Feng G, Jiang Y, Yong HH, Borland R, Fong GT. Prospective predictors of quitting behaviours among adult smokers in six cities in China: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China survey. Addiction. 2011;106(7):1335–1345. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03444.x.
    1. Li L, Borland R, Yong H-H, Fong GT, Bansal-Travers M, Quah AC, et al. Predictors of smoking cessation among adult smokers in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2010;12(suppl 1):S34–S44. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq030.
    1. West R, McEwen A, Bolling K, Owen L. Smoking cessation and smoking patterns in the general population: a 1-year follow-up. Addiction. 2001;96(6):891–902. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96689110.x.
    1. Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Balmford, J., Fong, G. T., Zanna, M. P., & Hastings, G. (2009). Do risk-minimizing beliefs about smoking inhibit quitting? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) four-country survey. Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 219–223. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.015.
    1. Hellman, R., Cummings, K., Haughey, B., Zielezny, M., & O'Shea, R. (1991). Predictors of attempting and succeeding at smoking cessation. Health Education Research, 6(1), 77–86.
    1. West R, May S, West M, Croghan E, McEwen A. Performance of English stop smoking services in first 10 years: analysis of service monitoring data. BMJ. 2013;347:f4921. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4921.
    1. Zhou, X., Nonnemaker, J., Sherrill, B., Gilsenan, A. W., Coste, F., & West, R. (2009). Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addictive Behaviors, 34(4), 365–373. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.013.
    1. Hagimoto A, Nakamura M, Morita T, Masui S, Oshima A. Smoking cessation patterns and predictors of quitting smoking among the Japanese general population: a 1-year follow-up study. Addiction. 2010;105(1):164–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02735.x.
    1. SF28. URL: (accessed 03-06-2015).
    1. West, R., Brown, J. Theory of Addiction. Wiley; 2013. ISBN: 978-0-470-67421-5.
    1. West R, Evans A, Michie S. Behavior change techniques used in group-based behavioral support by the English stop-smoking services and preliminary assessment of association with short-term quit outcomes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2011;13(12):1316–1320. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr120.
    1. West, R. (2009). The multiple facets of cigarette addiction and what they mean for encouraging and helping smokers to stop. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 6(4), 277–283.
    1. West R, Fidler J. Smoking and smoking cessation in England. 2010. England: London Vasco-Graphics URL: / (accessed 2015–03-11).
    1. Developer Economics. 2013. The “onboarding” problem. URL: (accessed 19–08-2015).
    1. Kotz, D., & West, R. (2009). Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it’s not in the trying, but in the succeeding. Tobacco Control, 18, 43–46. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.025981.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する