Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants without central nervous system anomalies born to symptomatic RT-PCR ZIKV positive women

Luis Alfonso Díaz-Martínez, Mario Augusto Rojas, Luz Stella Pinilla-García, Carlos Hernán Becerra-Mojica, Luis Alfonso Pérez-Vera, Luz Ángela Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Gustavo Adolfo Contreras-García, Carol Gisela Rueda-Ordoñez, Luis Villar, Luis Alfonso Díaz-Martínez, Mario Augusto Rojas, Luz Stella Pinilla-García, Carlos Hernán Becerra-Mojica, Luis Alfonso Pérez-Vera, Luz Ángela Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Gustavo Adolfo Contreras-García, Carol Gisela Rueda-Ordoñez, Luis Villar

Abstract

An epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection began in Colombia in October 2015. Previous studies have identified a cause-effect relationship between fetal exposure to the ZIKV and the development of microcephaly and other central nervous system (CNS) anomalies with variable degrees of neurodevelopmental delay. Less is known about the neurodevelopmental outcome of infants without CNS anomalies born to symptomatic ZIKV RT-PCR-positive women. We aimed to compare the neurodevelopmental outcome of these infants to a control group of infants without CNS anomalies born to asymptomatic ZIKV RT-PCR negative women who did not seroconvert during pregnancy. Participating infants were categorized according to ZIKV maternal exposure. Women with symptomatology suggestive of ZIKV infection and a positive RT-PCR for ZIKV were categorized as ZIKV-exposed. Maternal controls (ZIKV unexposed) from the same geographic area were subsequently captured during the tail end of the epidemic through a partner project, the ZIKAlliance, whose aim was to determine the prevalence of ZIKV in pregnant women. Infant survivors from these two groups of pregnant women had a neurodevelopmental evaluation at 12, 18, and 24 months corrected age (CA). The ZIKV-exposed women were found to be older, had less subsidized health care, had a higher percentage of women in middle-class socioeconomic strata, had higher technical and university education, were less likely to be living with a partner, and had higher rates of pregnancy comorbidity and premature births than ZIKV unexposed women. Compared to infants born to ZIKV unexposed women (unexposed), infants born to ZIKV exposed women (exposed) were of lower gestational age and required more speech and occupational therapy services. No differences between groups were observed in the proportion of cut-off scores <70 on the Bayley-III Scale at 12, 18, and 24 months for motor, language, and cognitive domains. When a cut-off of <85 was used, a higher percentage of motor and cognitive impairment was observed in unexposed infants at 12 and 24 months CA, respectively. Median and IQR score on the Bayley-III scale showed higher scores in favor of exposed infants for motor development at 12 and 18 months CA, language at 12 months, and cognitive domain at 12, 18, and 24 months. The adjusted median and IQR compound score of the difference between exposed and unexposed was higher in favor of exposed infants at 12 to 24 months CA for motor (3.8 [95% CI 1.0 to 6.7]) and cognitive domains (10.6 [95% CI 7.3 to 13.9]). We observed no differences in the language domain (1.9 [95% CI -1.2 to 5.0]). We conclude that infants with no evidence of microcephaly or other CNS anomalies born to ZIKV-exposed women had normal neurodevelopment up to 24 months of CA, supporting an all-or-nothing effect with maternal ZIKV exposure. Long-term follow-up to evaluate school performance is required. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02943304.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Patient flowchart.
Fig 1. Patient flowchart.
Patients were recruited from the same geographic region by two research groups: Zen Initiative and ZikAlliance.
Fig 2. Birthdate month of exposed and…
Fig 2. Birthdate month of exposed and unexposed study infants.
Red bars represents the exposed infant’s birthday and white bars repesents the unexposed infant’s birthday.

References

    1. Ladhani SN, O’Connor C, Kirkbride H, Brooks T, Morgan D. Outbreak of Zika virus disease in the Americas and the association with microcephaly, congenital malformations and Guillain–Barré syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101: 600–602. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310590
    1. Collins MH, Zepeda O, Blette B, Jadi R, Morales M, Pérez R, et al.. Serologic surveillance of maternal Zika infection in a prospective cohort in Leon, Nicaragua during the peak of the Zika epidemic. PLoS One. 2020;15: e0230692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230692
    1. Heukelbach J, Werneck GL. Surveillance of Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil. Lancet. 2016;388: 846–847. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30931-X
    1. Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al.. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360: 2536–2543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805715
    1. Ioos S, Mallet HP, Leparc Goffart I, Gauthier V, Cardoso T, Herida M. Current Zika virus epidemiology and recent epidemics. Med Mal Infect. 2014;44: 302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2014.04.008
    1. Cauchemez S, Besnard M, Bompard P, Dub T, Guillemette-Artur P, Eyrolle-Guignot D, et al.. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013–2015: A retrospective study. Lancet. 2016;71: 512–514. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000491260.72445.aa
    1. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR. Zika virus and birth defects—Reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med. 2016;374: 1981–1987. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1604338
    1. Hickman HD, Pierson TC. Zika in the brain: New models shed light on viral infection. Trends Mol Med. 2016;22: 639–641. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.06.004
    1. Cugola FR, Fernandez IR, Russo FB, Freitas BC, Dias JLM, Guimaraes KP, et al.. The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature. 2016;534: 267–271. doi: 10.1038/nature18296
    1. Carvalho A, Brites C, Mochida G, Ventura P, Fernandes A, Lage ML, et al.. Clinical and neurodevelopmental features in children with cerebral palsy and probable congenital Zika. Brian Dev. 2019;41: 587–594. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2019.03.005
    1. Mendes AKT, Ribeiro MRC, Lamy-Filho F, Amaral GA, Borges MCR, Costa LC, et al.. Congenital Zika syndrome: association between the gestational trimester of maternal infection, severity of brain computed tomography findings and microcephaly at birth. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2020;62: 1–8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-9946202062056
    1. Mulkey SB, Arroyave-Wessel M, Peyton C, Bulas DI, Fourzali Y, Jiang J, et al.. Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities in Children with in Utero Zika Virus Exposure Without Congenital Zika Syndrome. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174: 269–276. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5204
    1. Peçanha PM, Gomes Junior SC, Pone SM, Pone MV da S, Vasconcelos Z, Zin A, et al.. Neurodevelopment of children exposed intra-uterus by Zika virus: A case series. PLoS One. 2020;15: e0229434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229434
    1. Nielsen-Saines K, Brasil P, Kerin T, Vasconcelos Z, Gabaglia CR, Damasceno L, et al.. Delayed childhood neurodevelopment and neurosensory alterations in the second year of life in a prospective cohort of ZIKV-exposed children. Nat Med. 2019;25: 1213–1217. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0496-1
    1. Faiçal AV, De Oliveira JC, Oliveira JVV, De Almeida BL, Agra IA, Alcantara LCJ, et al.. Neurodevelopmental delay in normocephalic children with in utero exposure to Zika virus. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3: 9–11. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000486
    1. Einspieler C, Utsch F, Brasil P, Panvequio Aizawa CY, Peyton C, Hydee Hasue R, et al.. Association of infants exposed to prenatal Zika virus infection with their clinical, neurologic, and developmental status evaluated via the General Movement Assessment Tool. JAMA Netw open. 2019;2: e187235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7235
    1. Gerzson LR, de Almeida CS, Silva JH da, Feitosa MMA, de Oliveira LN, Schuler-Faccini L. Neurodevelopment of nonmicrocephalic children, after 18 months of life, exposed prenatally to Zika virus. J Child Neurol. 2020;35: 278–282. doi: 10.1177/0883073819892128
    1. Ospina ML, Tong VT, González M, Valencia D, Mercado M, Gilboa SM, et al.. Zika virus disease and pregnancy outcomes in Colombia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383: 537–545. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911023
    1. Avelino-Silva VI, Mayaud P, Tami A, Miranda MC, Rosenberger KD, Alexander N, et al.. Study protocol for the multicentre cohorts of Zika virus infection in pregnant women, infants, and acute clinical cases in Latin America and the Caribbean: The ZIKAlliance consortium. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19: 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3567-x
    1. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez-Andrade E, Johnsen SL, et al.. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(1):116–26. doi: 10.1002/uog.8831
    1. Paladini D, Malinger G, Monteagudo A, Pilu G, Timor-Tritsch I, Toi A. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: Guidelines for performing the “basic examination” and the “fetal neurosonogram.” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(1):109–16. doi: 10.1002/uog.3909
    1. Papageorghiou AT, Thilaganathan B, Bilardo CM, Ngu A, Malinger G, Herrera M, et al.. ISUOG Interim Guidance on ultrasound for Zika virus infection in pregnancy: Information for healthcare professionals. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(4):530–2. doi: 10.1002/uog.15896
    1. Gutierrez-Sanchez LA, Becerra-Mojica CH, Rojas MA, Diaz-Martinez LA, Perez-Vera LA, Contreras-Garcia GA et al.. Fetal central nervous system anomalies according to RT-PCR and trimester of infection with Zika virus: A prospective Cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;00:1–11. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14301
    1. Bayley N. Escalas Bayley de desarrollo infantil-III. Manual de aplicación. Madrid: PsycoCorp; 2005.
    1. Johnson S, Moore T, Marlow N. Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: Which cut-off should be used? Pediatr Res. 2014;75: 670–674. doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.10
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support Nathaniel. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42: 377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.Research
    1. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Volumen II: Categorical responses, counts, and survival. 3rd ed. College Station, Texas: Stata Press; 2012.
    1. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Metodología de estratificación socioeconómica urbana para servicios públicos domiciliarios. 2nd ed. Bogotá, Colombia: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística; 2015. Available:
    1. Georgieff MK, Ramel SE, Cusik SE. Nutritional influences on brain development. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107: 1310–1321. doi: 10.1111/apa.14287
    1. Aizawa CYP, Caron DMR, Souza CB de, Kozima PFA, Damasceno L, Einspieler C, et al.. Neurodevelopment in the third year of life in children with antenatal ZIKV-exposure. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55: 15. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002798
    1. Cardona-Ospina JA, Zapata MF, Grajales M, Arias MA, Grajales J, Bedoya-Rendón HD, et al.. Physical Growth and Neurodevelopment of a Cohort of Children after 3.5 Years of Follow-up from Mothers with Zika Infection during Pregnancy-Third Report of the ZIKERNCOL Study. J Trop Pediatr. 2021;67: 1–10. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab032
    1. Andrade LM, Baker Meio MD, Gomes SC, Souza JP, Figueiredo MR, Costa RP, et al.. Language delay was associated with a smaller head circumference at birth in asymptomatic infants prenatally exposed to the Zika virus. Acta Paediatr Int J Paediatr. 2021;110: 2375–2381. doi: 10.1111/apa.15878
    1. Gazeta RE, Bertozzi APAP, Dezena R de C de AB, Silva ACB, Fajardo TCG, Catalan DT, et al.. Three-year clinical follow-up of children intrauterine exposed to zika virus. Viruses. 2021;13: 1–15. doi: 10.3390/v13030523
    1. Hcini N, Kugbe Y, Rafalimanana ZHL, Lambert V, Mathieu M, Carles G, et al.. Association between confirmed congenital Zika infection at birth and outcomes up to 3 years of life. Nat Commun. 2021;12: 3270. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23468-3
    1. Stringer EM, Martínez E, Blette B, Toval Ruiz CE, Boivin M, Zepeda O, et al.. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of children following in utero exposure to Zika in Nicaragua. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72: E146–E153. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1833
    1. Grant R, Fléchelles O, Tressières B, Dialo M, Elenga N, Mediamolle N, et al.. In utero Zika virus exposure and neurodevelopment at 24 months in toddlers normocephalic at birth: a cohort study. BMC Med. 2021;19: 12. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01888-0
    1. Aguilar-Ticona JP, Nery N, Ladines-Lim JB, Gambrah C, Sacramento G, de Paula Freitas B, et al.. Developmental outcomes in children exposed to zika virus in utero from a brazilian urban slum cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15: e0009162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009162
    1. Reveiz L, Haby MM, Martínez-Vega R, Pinzón-Flores CE, Elias V, Smith E, et al.. Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0180220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180220
    1. Pass RF, Stagno S, Myres GL, Alford CA. Outcome of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: results of long-term longitudinal follow-up. Pediatrics. 1980;66: 758–762.
    1. Gutiérrez-Sánchez LA, Sandoval-Martínez DK, Díaz-Martínez LA, Becerra-Mojica CH. Zika virus infection: A correlation between prenatal ultrasonographic and postmortem neuropathologic changes. Neuropathology. 2019;39: 434–440. doi: 10.1111/neup.12603
    1. Raper J, Kovacs-Balint Z, Mavigner M, Gumber S, Burke MW, Habib J, et al.. Long-term alterations in brain and behavior after postnatal Zika virus infection in infant macaques. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7
    1. Barbeito-Andrés J, Pezzuto P, Higa LM, Dias AA, Vasconcelos JM, Santos TMP, et al.. Congenital Zika syndrome is associated with maternal protein malnutrition. Sci Adv. 2020;6: eaaw6284. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw6284
    1. Zhang W, Tan YW, Yam WK, Tu H, Qiu L, Tan EK, et al.. In utero infection of Zika virus leads to abnormal central nervous system development in mice. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2
    1. O’Shea TM, Joseph RM, Allred EN, Taylor HG, Leviton A, Heeren T et al.. ELGAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of the Bayley-II mental development index at 2 years as a predictor of cognitive impairment at school age among children born extremely preterm. J Perinatol. 2018;38: 908–916. doi: 10.1038/s41372-017-0020-8
    1. Paiva MHS, Guedes DRD, Leal WS, Ayres CFJ. Sensitivity of RT-PCR method in samples shown to be positive for zika virus by RT-qPCR in vector competence studies. Genet Mol Biol. 2017;40: 597–599. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0312

Source: PubMed

3
購読する