Extubation strategies in neuro-intensive care unit patients and associations with outcomes: the ENIO multicentre international observational study

Raphaël Cinotti, Paolo Pelosi, Marcus J Schultz, Ioakeimidou Aikaterini, Pablo Alvarez, Rafael Badenes, Victoria Mc Credie, Abdurrahmaan Suei Elbuzidi, Muhammed Elhadi, Daniel Agustin Godoy, Mohan Gurjar, Matthias Haenggi, Callum Kaye, Julio Cesar Mijangos-Méndez, Michael Piagnerelli, Romain Piracchio, Syed Tariq Reza, Robert D Stevens, Ueno Yoshitoyo, Karim Asehnoune, ENIO Study Group, Raphaël Cinotti, Paolo Pelosi, Marcus J Schultz, Ioakeimidou Aikaterini, Pablo Alvarez, Rafael Badenes, Victoria Mc Credie, Abdurrahmaan Suei Elbuzidi, Muhammed Elhadi, Daniel Agustin Godoy, Mohan Gurjar, Matthias Haenggi, Callum Kaye, Julio Cesar Mijangos-Méndez, Michael Piagnerelli, Romain Piracchio, Syed Tariq Reza, Robert D Stevens, Ueno Yoshitoyo, Karim Asehnoune, ENIO Study Group

Abstract

Background: Prolonged invasive ventilation is common in patients with severe brain injury. Information on optimal management of extubation and on the use of tracheostomy in these patients is scarce. International guidelines regarding the ventilator liberation and tracheostomy are currently lacking.

Methods: The aim of 'Extubation strategies in Neuro-Intensive care unit patients and associations with Outcomes' (ENIO) study is to describe current management of weaning from invasive ventilation, focusing on decisions on timing of tracheal extubation and tracheostomy in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with brain injury. We conducted a prospective, international, multi-centre observational study enrolling patients with various types of brain injury, including trauma, stroke, and subarachnoid haemorrhage, with an initial Glasgow Coma Score equal or less than 12, and a duration of invasive ventilation longer than 24 hours from ICU admission. ENIO is expected to include at least 1,500 patients worldwide. The primary endpoint of the ENIO study is extubation success in the 48 hours following endotracheal tube removal. The primary objective is to validate a score predictive of extubation success. To accomplish this, the study population will be randomly divided to a development cohort (2/3 of the included patients) and a validation cohort (the remaining 1/3). Secondary objectives are: to determine the incidence of extubation success rate according to various time-frames (within 96 hours, >96 hours after extubation); to validate (existing) prediction scores for successful extubation according to various time-frames and definitions (i.e., tracheostomy as extubation failure); and to describe the current practices of extubation and tracheostomy, and their associations.

Discussion: ENIO will be the largest prospective observational study of ventilator liberation and tracheostomy practices in patients with severe brain injury undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation, providing a validated predictive score of successful extubation.

Trial registration: The ENIO study is registered in the Clinical Trials database: NCT03400904.

Keywords: Weaning; brain injury; extubation; intra-cranial haemorrhage; subarachnoid haemorrhage; tracheostomy; traumatic brain injury; ventilator liberation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.160). Pr Karim Asehnoune received fees from Baxter, Edwards, LFB, Fisher and Payckel, out of the scope of the present work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Rosenfeld JV, Maas AI, Bragge P, et al. Early management of severe traumatic brain injury. Lancet 2012;380:1088-98. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60864-2
    1. Pelosi P, Ferguson ND, Frutos-Vivar F, et al. Management and outcome of mechanically ventilated neurologic patients*. Crit Care Med 2011;39:1482-92. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821209a8
    1. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007;29:1033-56. 10.1183/09031936.00010206
    1. Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, et al. Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1530-6. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9905102
    1. Namen AM, Ely EW, Tatter SB, et al. Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:658-64. 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2003060
    1. General Assembly of the World Medical Association . World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent 2014;81:14-8.
    1. European Medicine Agencies. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6 (R1). Available online:
    1. Asehnoune K, Seguin P, Lasocki S, et al. Extubation Success Prediction in a Multicentric Cohort of Patients with Severe Brain Injury. Anesthesiology 2017;127:338-46. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001725
    1. Thille AW, Boissier F, Ben Ghezala H, et al. Risk Factors for and Prediction by Caregivers of Extubation Failure in ICU Patients. Crit Care Med 2015;43:613-20. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000748
    1. Miltiades AN, Gershengorn HB, Hua M, et al. Cumulative Probability and Time to Reintubation in U.S. ICUs. Crit Care Med 2017;45:835-42. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002327
    1. Ruan SY, Teng NC, Wu HD, et al. Durability of Weaning Success for Liberation from Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: An Analysis of a Nationwide Database. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;196:792-5. 10.1164/rccm.201610-2153LE
    1. Roquilly A, Marret E, Abraham E, et al. Pneumonia prevention to decrease mortality in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2015;60:64-75. 10.1093/cid/ciu740
    1. Harell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies. Verlag S, editor. Springer Verlag, 2001.
    1. Tibshirani R, Bien J, Friedman J, et al. Strong rules for discarding predictors in lasso-type problems. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2012;74:245-66. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.01004.x
    1. Jaber S, Quintard H, Cinotti R, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for airway failure versus non-airway failure in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study of 1514 extubation procedures. Crit Care 2018;22:236. 10.1186/s13054-018-2150-6
    1. Godet T, Chabanne R, Marin J, et al. Extubation Failure in Brain-injured Patients: Risk Factors and Development of a Prediction Score in a Preliminary Prospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology 2017;126:104-14. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001379
    1. McCredie VA, Ferguson ND, Pinto RL, et al. Airway Management Strategies for Brain-injured Patients Meeting Standard Criteria to Consider Extubation. A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14:85-93. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-620OC
    1. Meredith W, Rutledge R, Fakhry SM, et al. The conundrum of the Glasgow Coma Scale in intubated patients: a linear regression prediction of the Glasgow verbal score from the Glasgow eye and motor scores. J Trauma 1998;44:839-44; discussion 844-5. 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00016
    1. Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, et al. Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2011;39:2612-8. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a5a

Source: PubMed

3
購読する