PROMIS Scales for Assessment of Persistent Post-COVID Symptoms: A Cross Sectional Study

Ravindra Ganesh, Aditya K Ghosh, Mark A Nyman, Ivana T Croghan, Stephanie L Grach, Christopher V Anstine, Bradley R Salonen, Ryan T Hurt, Ravindra Ganesh, Aditya K Ghosh, Mark A Nyman, Ivana T Croghan, Stephanie L Grach, Christopher V Anstine, Bradley R Salonen, Ryan T Hurt

Abstract

Objective: Persistent post-COVID symptoms are estimated to occur in up to 10% of patients who have had COVID-19. These lingering symptoms may persist for weeks to months after resolution of the acute illness. This study aimed to add insight into our understanding of certain post-acute conditions and clinical findings. The primary purpose was to determine the persistent post COVID impairments prevalence and characteristics by collecting post COVID illness data utilizing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). The resulting measures were used to assess surveyed patients physical, mental, and social health status.

Methods: A cross-sectional study and 6-months Mayo Clinic COVID recovered registry data were used to evaluate continuing symptoms severity among the 817 positive tested patients surveyed between March and September 2020. The resulting PROMIS® data set was used to analyze patients post 30 days health status. The e-mailed questionnaires focused on fatigue, sleep, ability to participate in social roles, physical function, and pain.

Results: The large sample size (n = 817) represented post hospitalized and other managed outpatients. Persistent post COVID impairments prevalence and characteristics were determined to be demographically young (44 years), white (87%), and female (61%). Dysfunction as measured by the PROMIS® scales in patients recovered from acute COVID-19 was reported as significant in the following domains: ability to participate in social roles (43.2%), pain (17.8%), and fatigue (16.2%).

Conclusion: Patient response on the PROMIS® scales was similar to that seen in multiple other studies which used patient reported symptoms. As a result of this experience, we recommend utilizing standardized scales such as the PROMIS® to obtain comparable data across the patients' clinical course and define the disease trajectory. This would further allow for effective comparison of data across studies to better define the disease process, risk factors, and assess the impact of future treatments.

Keywords: COVID-19; PASC; PROMIS; SARS-CoV-2; fatigue; long haulers; post COVID symptoms; post COVID syndrome; social roles; survey.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient selection and response to questionnaires.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Dysfunction in PROMIS domains in patients recovered from acute COVID-19.

References

    1. Johns Hopkins University & Medicine. Coronavirus Resource Center. 2021. Accessed May 2, 2021.
    1. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F, Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(6):603-605.
    1. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, et al.. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol. 2021;93(2):1013-1022.
    1. Logue JK, Franko NM, McCulloch DJ, et al.. Sequelae in adults at 6 months after COVID-19 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e210830.
    1. Tenforde MW, Kim SS, Lindsell CJ, et al.. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network – United States, March-June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(30):993-998.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Knight M, A’Court C, Buxton M, Husain L. Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care. BMJ. 2020;370:m3026.
    1. Havervall S, Rosell A, Phillipson M, et al.. Symptoms and functional impairment assessed 8 months after mild COVID-19 among health care workers. JAMA. 2021;325(19):2015-2016.
    1. Czeisler ME, Lane RI, Petrosky E, et al.. Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic – United States, June 24-30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(32):1049-1057.
    1. Crane SJ, Ganesh R, Post JA, Jacobson NA. Telemedicine consultations and follow-up of patients with COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(9S):S33-S34.
    1. Ganesh R, Salonen BR, Bhuiyan MN, et al.. Managing patients in the COVID-19 pandemic: a virtual multidisciplinary approach. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021;5(1):118-126.
    1. O’Horo JC, Cerhan JR, Cahn EJ, et al.. Outcomes of COVID-19 with the Mayo Clinic model of care and research. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(3):601-608.
    1. National Institutes of Health. Patient-Reported Oucomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). Program: PROMIS® web site. 2019. Updated January 29, 2019. Accessed May 5, 2021.
    1. Ameringer S, Elswick RK Jr, Menzies V, et al.. Psychometric evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system fatigue-short form across diverse populations. Nurs Res. 2016;65(4):279-289.
    1. Yang M, Keller S, Lin JS. Psychometric properties of the PROMIS® ((R)) fatigue short form 7a among adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(12):3375-3384.
    1. Yost KJ, Waller NG, Lee MK, Vincent A. The PROMIS® fatigue item bank has good measurement properties in patients with fibromyalgia and severe fatigue. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(6):1417-1426.
    1. Askew RL, Cook KF, Revicki DA, Cella D, Amtmann D. Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS® pain interference and pain behavior. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:103-111.
    1. Merriwether EN, Rakel BA, Zimmerman MB, et al.. Reliability and construct validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) instruments in women with fibromyalgia. Pain Med. 2017;18(8):1485-1495.
    1. Nayfe R, Chansard M, Hynan LS, et al.. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system and legacy instruments in multiple domains among older veterans with chronic back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):598.
    1. Cook KF, Jensen SE, Schalet BD, et al.. PROMIS® measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:89-102.
    1. Lambert NJ, Corps S. COVID-19 “Long Hauler” Symptoms Survey Report. Indiana University School of Medicine; 2020.
    1. Takahashi T, Ellingson MK, Wong P, et al.. Sex differences in immune responses that underlie COVID-19 disease outcomes. Nature. 2020;588(7837):315-320.
    1. Sudre CH, Murray B, Varsavsky T, et al.. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):626-631.
    1. Bradburn NM. Presidential address: a response to the nonresponse problem. Public Opin Q. 1992;56:391-397.
    1. Groves RM. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
    1. Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q. 2005;69:87-98.
    1. Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology. 2006;17:413-418.
    1. Forthofer RN. Investigation of nonresponse bias in NHANES II. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:507-515.
    1. Bradshaw L, Sumner J, Delic J, Henneberger P, Fishwick D. Work aggravated asthma in Great Britain: a cross-sectional postal survey. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018:19(6):561-569.
    1. Hardigan PC, Popovici I, Carvajal MJ. Response rate, response time, and economic costs of survey research: a randomized trial of practicing pharmacists. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016;12(1):141-148.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する