Acceptability of a Mobile Phone App for Measuring Time Use in Breast Cancer Survivors (Life in a Day): Mixed-Methods Study

Matthew Cole Ainsworth, Dori Pekmezi, Heather Bowles, Diane Ehlers, Edward McAuley, Kerry S Courneya, Laura Q Rogers, Matthew Cole Ainsworth, Dori Pekmezi, Heather Bowles, Diane Ehlers, Edward McAuley, Kerry S Courneya, Laura Q Rogers

Abstract

Background: Advancements in mobile technology allow innovative data collection techniques such as measuring time use (ie, how individuals structure their time) for the purpose of improving health behavior change interventions.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability of a 5-day trial of the Life in a Day mobile phone app measuring time use in breast cancer survivors to advance technology-based measurement of time use.

Methods: Acceptability data were collected from participants (N=40; 100% response rate) using a self-administered survey after 5 days of Life in a Day use.

Results: Overall, participants had a mean age of 55 years (SD 8) and completed 16 years of school (SD 2). Participants generally agreed that learning to use Life in a Day was easy (83%, 33/40) and would prefer to log activities using Life in a Day over paper-and-pencil diary (73%, 29/40). A slight majority felt that completing Life in a Day for 5 consecutive days was not too much (60%, 24/40) or overly time-consuming (68%, 27/40). Life in a Day was rated as easy to read (88%, 35/40) and navigate (70%, 32/40). Participants also agreed that it was easy to log activities using the activity timer at the start and end of an activity (90%, 35/39). Only 13% (5/40) downloaded the app on their personal phone, whereas 63% (19/30) of the remaining participants would have preferred to use their personal phone. Overall, 77% (30/39) of participants felt that the Life in a Day app was good or very good. Those who agreed that it was easy to edit activities were significantly more likely to be younger when compared with those who disagreed (mean 53 vs 58 years, P=.04). Similarly, those who agreed that it was easy to remember to log activities were more likely to be younger (mean 52 vs 60 years, P<.001). Qualitative coding of 2 open-ended survey items yielded 3 common themes for Life in a Day improvement (ie, convenience, user interface, and reminders).

Conclusions: A mobile phone app is an acceptable time-use measurement modality. Improving convenience, user interface, and memory prompts while addressing the needs of older participants is needed to enhance app utility.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00929617; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00929617 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6z2bZ4P7X).

Keywords: cancer; mHealth; physical activity; technology; time management.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Matthew Cole Ainsworth, Dori Pekmezi, Heather Bowles, Diane Ehlers, Edward McAuley, Kerry S Courneya, Laura Q Rogers. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (http://cancer.jmir.org), 14.05.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Customizable activity buttons for Life in a Day time use mobile app.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Daily log with example activity for Life in a Day time use mobile app.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Life in a Day participant mean age by survey item agreement. All statistically significant (P<.05 interactions are denoted with an asterisk>

References

    1. American Cancer Society ACS. 2017. [2017-09-06]. Cancer Facts & Figures 2017 .
    1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):252–71. doi: 10.3322/caac.21235. doi: 10.3322/caac.21235.
    1. Mctiernan A. Cancer Prevention and Management through Exercise and Weight Control (Nutrition and Disease Prevention) Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.
    1. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee . 2008. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008 .
    1. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jul;38(3):105–13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.
    1. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):207–15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004.
    1. Arem H, Moore SC, Patel A, Hartge P, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Visvanathan K, Campbell PT, Freedman M, Weiderpass E, Adami HO, Linet MS, Lee IM, Matthews CE. Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. J Am Med Assoc Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959–67. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.
    1. Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Park Y, Katki HA, Linet MS, Weiderpass E, Visvanathan K, Helzlsouer KJ, Thun M, Gapstur SM, Hartge P, Lee IM. Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335.
    1. Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK, Yang YC, Cheng TY, Lee M, Chan HT, Tsao CK, Tsai SP, Wu X. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011 Oct 1;378(9798):1244–53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6.
    1. Rowland TW. The biological basis of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Mar;30(3):392–9.
    1. Gomersall SR, Rowlands AV, English C, Maher C, Olds TS. The ActivityStat hypothesis: the concept, the evidence and the methodologies. Sports Med. 2013 Feb;43(2):135–49. doi: 10.1007/s40279-012-0008-7.
    1. Gomersall S, Maher C, English C, Rowlands A, Olds T. Time regained: when people stop a physical activity program, how does their time use change? A randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126665.
    1. Gomersall SR, Norton K, Maher C, English C, Olds TS. In search of lost time: when people undertake a new exercise program, where does the time come from? A randomized controlled trial. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jan;18(1):43–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.01.004.
    1. Ridley K, Olds TS, Hill A. The Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents (MARCA): development and evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 May 26;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-10.
    1. Shiffman S. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in studies of substance use. Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):486–97. doi: 10.1037/a0017074.
    1. Gomersall SR, Olds TS, Ridley K. Development and evaluation of an adult use-of-time instrument with an energy expenditure focus. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Mar;14(2):143–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.006.
    1. Sprod JA, Olds TS, Burton NW, Brown WJ, van Uffelen JG, Ferrar KE, Maher CA. Patterns and correlates of time use and energy expenditure in older Australian workers: a descriptive study. Maturitas. 2016 Aug;90:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.05.009.
    1. Ferrar KE, Olds TS, Walters JL. All the stereotypes confirmed: differences in how Australian boys and girls use their time. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Oct;39(5):589–95. doi: 10.1177/1090198111423942.
    1. Mathers M, Canterford L, Olds T, Hesketh K, Ridley K, Wake M. Electronic media use and adolescent health and well-being: cross-sectional community study. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9(5):307–14. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.04.003.
    1. Olds T, Ferrar KE, Gomersall SR, Maher C, Walters JL. The elasticity of time: associations between physical activity and use of time in adolescents. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Dec;39(6):732–6. doi: 10.1177/1090198111429822.
    1. Tey C, Wake M, Campbell M, Hampton A, Williams J. The Light Time-Use Diary and preschool activity patterns: exploratory study. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2(3):167–73. doi: 10.1080/17477160701369274.
    1. Albright K, Gechter K, Kempe A. Importance of mixed methods in pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(5):400–7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.06.010.
    1. Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Anton PM, Courneya KS, Vicari S, Hopkins-Price P, Verhulst S, Mocharnuk R, Hoelzer K. Better exercise adherence after treatment for cancer (BEAT Cancer) study: rationale, design, and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jan;33(1):124–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.004.
    1. Zelinski EM, Gilewski MJ. A 10-item Rasch modeled memory self-efficacy scale. Aging Ment Health. 2004 Jul;8(4):293–306. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001709665.
    1. Carlson JR, Zmud RW. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad Manage J. 1999;42(2):153–170. doi: 10.2307/257090.
    1. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989 Aug;35(8):982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
    1. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277–88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    1. Kondracki NL, Wellman NS, Amundson DR. Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002;34(4):224–30.
    1. Martin EC, Basen-Engquist K, Cox MG, Lyons EJ, Carmack CL, Blalock JA, Demark-Wahnefried W. Interest in health behavior intervention delivery modalities among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. JMIR Cancer. 2016 Feb 11;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/cancer.5247.
    1. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1–32.
    1. Ratcliff CG, Lam CY, Arun B, Valero V, Cohen L. Ecological momentary assessment of sleep, symptoms, and mood during chemotherapy for breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2014 Nov;23(11):1220–8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3525.
    1. Basen-Engquist K, Carmack CL, Li Y, Brown J, Jhingran A, Hughes DC, Perkins HY, Scruggs S, Harrison C, Baum G, Bodurka DC, Waters A. Social-cognitive theory predictors of exercise behavior in endometrial cancer survivors. Health Psychol. 2013 Nov;32(11):1137–48. doi: 10.1037/a0031712.
    1. Fanning J, Mackenzie M, Roberts S, Crato I, Ehlers D, McAuley E. Physical activity, mind wandering, affect, and sleep: an ecological momentary assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 31;4(3):e104. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5855.
    1. Runyan JD, Steenbergh TA, Bainbridge C, Daugherty DA, Oke L, Fry BN. A smartphone ecological momentary assessment/intervention “app” for collecting real-time data and promoting self-awareness. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071325.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する