Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control

Dion Zappe, Cheraz Cherif Papst, Philippe Ferber, PROMPT Investigators, Dion Zappe, Cheraz Cherif Papst, Philippe Ferber, PROMPT Investigators

Abstract

Objective: Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for achieving BP control.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, 14-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various doses of valsartan +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ for maximizing BP control in 1,285 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with stage 1 hypertension and naïve to antihypertensive therapy (33.9%) started valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 2 hypertension (13.5%) or those uncontrolled on current antihypertensive monotherapy (52.6%) started valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg. At weeks 4, 8, and 11, patients not achieving BP control were up-titrated (maximum: valsartan 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg).

Results: At study end, 78.8% of patients on valsartan +/- HCTZ were controlled (BP <140/90 mmHg) and still on study medication versus 67.8% on amlodipine +/- HCTZ (P < 0.0001). Amlodipine-treated patients had a higher incidence of peripheral edema (22.4% vs 2.2%) and associated discontinuations (7.3% vs <1%). Initiating therapy earlier with valsartan/HCTZ, rather than titrating monotherapy to its maximum dose before adding a second agent, was superior to amlodipine monotherapy or amlodipine +/- HCTZ for achieving BP control, and avoided excessive treatment adjustments and maintained tolerability.

Keywords: combination therapy; efficacy; hydrochlorothiazide; hypertension; titration; tolerability.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. Abbreviations: Amlo, amlodipine; HCTZ, hydrochlorothiazide; Val, valsartan.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient disposition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients who achieved blood pressure (BP) control (mean sitting systolic/diastolic BP

Figure 4

Percentage of patients on each…

Figure 4

Percentage of patients on each treatment regimen at week 11, the last up-titration…

Figure 4
Percentage of patients on each treatment regimen at week 11, the last up-titration visit. Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding. Numbers on x-axis represent doses (in mg) of valsartan, valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), amlodipine, and amlodipine/HCTZ. Abbreviation: DC, discontinuation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of patients on each treatment regimen at week 11, the last up-titration visit. Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding. Numbers on x-axis represent doses (in mg) of valsartan, valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), amlodipine, and amlodipine/HCTZ. Abbreviation: DC, discontinuation.

References

    1. Basile JN, Chrysant S. The importance of early antihypertensive efficacy: the role of angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20(3):169–175.
    1. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J Hypertens. 2007;25(6):1105–1187.
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–1252.
    1. Weir MR, Crikelair N, Levy D, Rocha R, Kuturu V, Glazer R. Evaluation of the dose response with valsartan and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2007;9(2):103–112.
    1. Weir MR, Levy D, Crikelair N, Rocha R, Meng X, Glazer R. Time to achieve blood-pressure goal: influence of dose of valsartan monotherapy and valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20(7):807–815.
    1. Steffen HM. Amlodipine – a third generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonist. J Clin Basic Cardiol. 1999;2(1):45–52.
    1. Tyler HM. Amlodipine: an effective once-daily antihypertensive agent. J Hum Hypertens. 1991;5(Suppl 1):61–66.
    1. Wagstaff AJ. Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs. 2006;66(14):1881–1901.
    1. Pool JL, Glazer R, Weinberger M, Alvarado R, Huang J, Graff A. Comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy at doses up to 320/25 mg versus monotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by long-term combination therapy in hypertensive adults. Clin Ther. 2007;29(1):61–73.
    1. Palatini P, Malacco E, Di SS, et al. Trough:peak ratio and smoothness index in the evaluation of 24-h blood pressure control in hypertension: a comparative study between valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination and amlodipine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;57(11):765–770.
    1. Weir MR, Ferdinand KC, Flack JM, Jamerson KA, Daley W, Zelenkofske S. A noninferiority comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination versus amlodipine in black hypertensives. Hypertension. 2005;46(3):508–513.
    1. Ruilope LM, Malacco E, Khder Y, Kandra A, Bönner G, Heintz D. Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study. Clin Ther. 2005;27(5):578–587.
    1. Ruilope LM, Heintz D, Brandao AA, et al. 24-hour ambulatory blood-pressure effects of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide combinations compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients at increased cardiovascular risk: a VAST sub-study. Blood Press Monit. 2005;10(2):85–91.
    1. Lacourcière Y, Wright JT, Jr, Samuel R, Zappe D, Purkayastha D, Black HR. Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14(3):112–120.
    1. Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry Circulation 199388(5 Pt 1):2460–2470.
    1. Neutel JM. The use of combination drug therapy in the treatment of hypertension. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002;17(2):81–88.
    1. Nickenig G, Ostergren J, Struijker-Boudier H. Clinical evidence for the cardiovascular benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2006;7(Suppl 1):S1–S7.
    1. Weir MR. Providing end-organ protection with renin-angiotensin system inhibition: the evidence so far. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2006;8(2):99–105.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Hypertension Management of hypertension in adults in primary careNICE clinical guideline 34. 2006. Available at: Accessed June 2008.
    1. Brown MJ, Cruickshank JK, Dominiczak AF, et al. Better blood pressure control: how to combine drugs. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17(2):81–86.
    1. Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, et al. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(15):1547–1559.
    1. Sica DA. Combination ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker therapy – future considerations. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2007;9(1):78–86.
    1. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9489):895–906.
    1. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(23):2417–2428.
    1. Palatini P, Mugellini A, Spagnuolo V, et al. Comparison of the effects on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure of valsartan and amlodipine, alone or in combination with a low-dose diuretic, in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (Val-syst Study) Blood Press Monit. 2004;9(2):91–97.
    1. Malacco E, Vari N, Capuano V, Spagnuolo V, Borgnino C, Palatini P. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparison of valsartan and amlodipine in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in elderly patients: the Val-Syst study. Clin Ther. 2003;25(11):2765–2780.
    1. Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9426):2022–2031.
    1. Verdecchia P, Angeli F. Assessment of the optimal daily dose of valsartan in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or both. Clin Ther. 2004;26(4):460–472.
    1. Oparil S, Yarows SA, Patel S, Fang H, Zhang J, Satlin A. Efficacy and safety of combined use of aliskiren and valsartan in patients with hypertension: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):221–229.
    1. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Khder Y, Calvo C. Ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of valsartan and enalapril after a missed dose in previously untreated patients with hypertension: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial. Clin Ther. 2008;30(1):108–120.
    1. Maillard MP, Würzner G, Nussberger J, Centeno C, Burnier M, Brunner HR. Comparative angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy volunteers: the importance of dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;71(1):68–76.
    1. Latif F, Tandon S, Obeleniene R, et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with 80 and 160 mg valsartan in healthy, normotensive subjects. J Card Fail. 2001;7(3):265–268.
    1. Osterloh I.The safety of amlodipine Am Heart J 1989118(5 Pt 2): 1114–1119.
    1. Elliott WJ. What factors contribute to the inadequate control of elevated blood pressure? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008;10(1 Suppl 1):20–26.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する