Estimating maternity ward birth attendant time use in India: a microcosting study

Katherine T Lofgren, Lauren Bobanski, Danielle E Tuller, Vinay P Singh, Megan Marx Delaney, Amanda Jurczak, Meera Ragavan, Tapan Kalita, Ami Karlage, Stephen Charles Resch, Katherine E A Semrau, Katherine T Lofgren, Lauren Bobanski, Danielle E Tuller, Vinay P Singh, Megan Marx Delaney, Amanda Jurczak, Meera Ragavan, Tapan Kalita, Ami Karlage, Stephen Charles Resch, Katherine E A Semrau

Abstract

Objectives: Despite global concern over the quality of maternal care, little is known about the time requirements to complete the essential birth practices. Using three microcosting data collection methods within the BetterBirth trial, we aimed to assess time use and the specific time requirements to incorporate the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist into clinical practice.

Setting: We collected detailed survey data on birth attendant time use within the BetterBirth trial in Uttar Pradesh, India. The BetterBirth trial tested whether the peer-coaching-based implementation of the WHO Checklist was effective in improving the quality of facility-based childbirth care.

Participants: We collected measurements of time to completion for 18 essential birth practices from July 2016 through October 2016 across 10 facilities in five districts (1559 total timed observations). An anonymous survey asked about the impact of the WHO Checklist on birth attendants at every intervention facility (15 facilities, 83 respondents) in the Lucknow hub. Additionally, data collectors visited facilities to conduct a census of patients and birth attendants across 20 facilities in seven districts between June 2016 and November 2016 (six hundred and ten 2-hour facility observations).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure of this study is the per cent of staff time required to complete the essential birth practices included in the WHO Checklist.

Results: When birth attendants were timed, we found practices were completed rapidly (18 s to 2 min). As the patient load increased, time dedicated to clinical care increased but remained low relative to administrative and downtime. On average, WHO Checklist clinical care accounted for less than 7% of birth attendant time use per hour.

Conclusions: We did not find that a coaching-based implementation of the WHO Checklist was a burden on birth attendant's time use. However, questions remain regarding the performance quality of practices and how to accurately capture and interpret idle and break time.

Trial registration number: NCT02148952.

Keywords: health economics; maternal medicine; quality in health care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time-to-complete specific Checklist-related tasks. Tasks with two or fewer observations have been excluded from this graph. The underlying data for this graph is available in online supplemental table A6.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Birth attendant tasks stratified by patient load per provider. Coloured bar regions represent the IQR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Per cent of facility staff hours recorded as downtime by patient load per birth attendant.

References

    1. Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, et al. . Monitoring universal health coverage within the sustainable development goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e152–68. 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30472-2
    1. Lozano R, Wang H, Foreman KJ, et al. . Progress towards millennium development goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2011;378:1139–65. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61337-8
    1. United Nations Millennium Development Goals [Internet]. Available: [Accessed Sep 2018].
    1. Ng M, Misra A, Diwan V, et al. . An assessment of the impact of the JSY cash transfer program on maternal mortality reduction in Madhya Pradesh, India. Glob Health Action 2014;7:24939. 10.3402/gha.v7.24939
    1. Okeke EN, Chari AV. Can institutional deliveries reduce newborn mortality? Evidence from Rwanda. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015.
    1. Ronsmans C, Scott S, Qomariyah SN, et al. . Professional assistance during birth and maternal mortality in two Indonesian districts. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:416–23. 10.2471/BLT.08.051581
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, et al. . Stillbirths: where? when? why? how to make the data count? The Lancet 2011;377:1448–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62187-3
    1. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Joseph NT, et al. . Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries. Lancet 2018;392:2203–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4
    1. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. . High-Quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e1196–252. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3
    1. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, et al. . Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet 2014;384:347–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3
    1. Leslie HH, Sun Z, Kruk ME. Association between infrastructure and observed quality of care in 4 healthcare services: a cross-sectional study of 4,300 facilities in 8 countries. PLoS Med 2017;14:e1002464. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002464
    1. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994;38:1091–110. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7
    1. WHO . WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist [Internet]. Available: [Accessed 3 May 2018].
    1. Perry W, Bagheri Nejad S, Tuomisto K, et al. . Implementing the WHO safe childbirth checklist: lessons from a global collaboration. BMJ Glob Health 2017;2:e000241. 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000241
    1. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. . A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491–9. 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
    1. Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM, et al. . Simulation-Based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med 2013;368:246–53. 10.1056/NEJMsa1204720
    1. Munabi-Babigumira S, Glenton C, Lewin S, et al. . Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;11:CD011558. 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2
    1. Knight HE, Self A, Kennedy SH. Why are women dying when they reach hospital on time? A systematic review of the 'third delay'. PLoS One 2013;8:e63846. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063846
    1. Semrau KEA, Hirschhorn LR, Marx Delaney M, et al. . Outcomes of a Coaching-Based WHO safe childbirth checklist program in India. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2313–24. 10.1056/NEJMoa1701075
    1. Semrau KEA, Hirschhorn LR, Kodkany B, et al. . Effectiveness of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program in reducing severe maternal, fetal, and newborn harm in Uttar Pradesh, India: study protocol for a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016;17:576. 10.1186/s13063-016-1673-x
    1. Finkler SA, Knickman JR, Hendrickson G, et al. . A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. Health Serv Res 1993;28:577–97.
    1. Tsai W-H. A technical note on using work sampling to estimate the effort on activities under activity-based costing. Int J Prod Econ 1996;43:11–16. 10.1016/0925-5273(95)00189-1
    1. Wallwiener S, Müller M, Doster A, et al. . Predictors of impaired breastfeeding initiation and maintenance in a diverse sample: what is important? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;294:455–66. 10.1007/s00404-015-3994-5
    1. Colin WB, Scott JA. Breastfeeding: reasons for starting, reasons for stopping and problems along the way. Breastfeed Rev 2002;10:13–19.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene Task force. MMWR 2002;51.
    1. Austin A, Langer A, Salam RA, et al. . Approaches to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health care: an overview of the evidence. Reprod Health 2014;11(Suppl 2):S1. 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S1
    1. Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, et al. . Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:335–43. 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864
    1. Mann S, Hollier LM, McKay K, et al. . What We Can Do about Maternal Mortality - And How to Do It Quickly. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1689–91. 10.1056/NEJMp1810649
    1. Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C, et al. . Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. Lancet 2016;388:2307–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31333-2
    1. Bustreo F, Say L, Koblinsky M, et al. . Ending preventable maternal deaths: the time is now. Lancet Glob Health 2013;1:e176–7. 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70059-7

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する