Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria

Ric N Price, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Michele van Vugt, Al Brockman, Robert Hutagalung, Shalini Nair, Denae Nash, Pratap Singhasivanon, Tim J C Anderson, Sanjeev Krishna, Nicholas J White, François Nosten, Ric N Price, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Michele van Vugt, Al Brockman, Robert Hutagalung, Shalini Nair, Denae Nash, Pratap Singhasivanon, Tim J C Anderson, Sanjeev Krishna, Nicholas J White, François Nosten

Abstract

Background: Our study examined the relative contributions of host, pharmacokinetic, and parasitological factors in determining the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine (AL).

Methods: On the northwest border of Thailand, patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were enrolled in prospective studies of AL treatment (4- or 6-dose regimens) and followed up for 42 days. Plasma lumefantrine concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography; malaria parasite pfmdr1 copy number was quantified using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR), and in vitro drug susceptibility was tested.

Results: All treatments resulted in a rapid clinical response and were well tolerated. PCR-corrected failure rates at day 42 were 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6%-17%) for the 4-dose regimen and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8%-4.6%) for the 6-dose regimen. Increased pfmdr1 copy number was associated with a 2-fold (95% CI, 1.8-2.4-fold) increase in lumefantrine inhibitory concentration(50) (P=.001) and an adjusted hazard ratio for risk of treatment failure following completion of a 4-dose regimen, but not a 6-dose regimen, of 4.0 (95% CI, 1.4-11; P=.008). Patients who had lumefantrine levels below 175 ng/mL on day 7 were more likely to experience recrudescence by day 42 (adjusted hazard ratio, 17; 95% CI, 5.5-53), allowing prediction of treatment failure with 75% sensitivity and 84% specificity. The 6-dose regimen ensured that therapeutic levels were achieved in 91% of treated patients.

Conclusions: The lumefantrine plasma concentration profile is the main determinant of efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine. Amplification in pfmdr1 determines lumefantrine susceptibility and, therefore, treatment responses when plasma lumefantrine levels are subtherapeutic.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profile. AL48, regimen of 4 doses of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) over 48 h; AL60, regimen of 6 doses of AL over 60 h; AL96, regimen of 6 doses of AL over 96 h.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative percentage of patients with recrudescence (PCR-corrected) following completion of a 4-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine. Overall, P = .004.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する