Model-driven diabetes care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Stein Olav Skrøvseth, Eirik Årsand, Fred Godtliebsen, Ragnar M Joakimsen, Stein Olav Skrøvseth, Eirik Årsand, Fred Godtliebsen, Ragnar M Joakimsen

Abstract

Background: People with type 1 diabetes who use electronic self-help tools register a large amount of information about their disease on their participating devices; however, this information is rarely utilized beyond the immediate investigation. We have developed a diabetes diary for mobile phones and a statistics-based feedback module, which we have named Diastat, to give data-driven feedback to the patient based on their own data.

Method: In this study, up to 40 participants will be given a smartphone on which is loaded a diabetes self-help application (app), the Few Touch Application (FTA). Participants will be randomized into two groups to be given access to Diastat 4 or 12 weeks, respectively after receiving the smartphone, and will use the FTA with Diastat for 8 weeks after this point. The primary endpoint is the frequency of high and low blood-glucose measurements.

Discussion: The study will investigate the effect of data-driven feedback to patients. Our hypothesis is that this will improve glycemic control and reduce variability. The endpoints are robust indicators that can be assembled with minimal effort by the patient beyond normal routine.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01774149.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow in the study. HbA1c measurements indicated by dashed lines, endpoint monitoring periods are shaded.

References

    1. Schwartz FL, Vernier SJ, Shubrook JH, Marling CR. Evaluating the automated blood glucose pattern detection and case-retrieval modules of the 4 Diabetes Support System. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:1563–1569.
    1. Skrøvseth SO, Årsand E, Godtliebsen F, Hartvigsen G. Mobile phone-based pattern recognition and data analysis for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14:1098–1104. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0160.
    1. Laurenzi A, Bolla AM, Panigoni G, Doria V, Uccellatore A, Peretti E, Saibene A, Galimberti G, Bosi E, Scavini M. Effects of carbohydrate counting on glucose control and quality of life over 24 weeks in adult patients with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized, prospective clinical trial (GIOCAR) Diabetes Care. 2011;34:823–827. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1490.
    1. Trento M, Borgo E, Kucich C, Passera P, Trinetta A, Charrier L, Cavallo F, Porta M. Quality of life, coping ability, and metabolic control in patients with type 1 diabetes managed by group care and a carbohydrate counting program. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:e134. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0903.
    1. Ceriello A, Ihnat MA. “Glycaemic variability”: a new therapeutic challenge in diabetes and the critical care setting. Diabet Med. 2010;27:862–867.
    1. Kovatchev BP, Otto E, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick L, Clarke W. Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2433–2438. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1085.
    1. Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-54.
    1. Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007.
    1. R Development Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011.
    1. Skrøvseth SO, Bellika JG, Godtliebsen F. Causality in scale space as an approach to change detection. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052253.
    1. Skrøvseth SO, Arsand E, Joakimsen RM, Hartvigsen G. Utilization of self-gathered patient data in a mobile-phone- based feedback system for patients with type 1 diabetes. Paris, France: 6th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD 2013); 2013.
    1. Brooke J. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry. Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL, editor. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996. SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale.
    1. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Gruppen LD, Funnell MM, Oh MS. The diabetes empowerment scale-short form (DES-SF) Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1641–1642. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1641.
    1. Kirkwood B, Sterne J. Essential Medical Statistics. 2. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2003.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する