Role of pulmonary function in the detection of allograft dysfunction after heart-lung transplantation

A Van Muylem, C Mélot, M Antoine, C Knoop, M Estenne, A Van Muylem, C Mélot, M Antoine, C Knoop, M Estenne

Abstract

Background: Lung function is altered by infection and rejection in patients who undergo heart-lung transplantation. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of lung function for the detection of allograft dysfunction in these patients were measured.

Methods: Thirty three patients who underwent heart-lung transplantation were followed for a mean period of 16.3 months. On 123 occasions functional measurements were obtained at the time a transbronchial biopsy specimen and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was taken, which were used as gold standards. Optimal sensitivity (the value for which sensitivity equals specificity) was computed for each functional test from receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: Acute rejection was present on 31 occasions and infection on 36 occasions; 56 samples were normal. Infection and rejection were accompanied by airflow obstruction, a rise in the slopes of the alveolar plateaus for nitrogen, hexafluoride sulphur and helium (SN2, SSF6, and SHe), and a decrease in the difference between SSF6 and SHe (delta S), total lung capacity (TLC), and lung transfer factor (TLCO). Optimal sensitivities for SHe, mid forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75), TLC, and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were 68%, 67%, 66%, and 60%, respectively; they were not different for infection and rejection and did not change over the study period. For infection and rejection together, PPV ranged from 72% to 88% and NPV from 27% to 52% according to the functional test and the postoperative period considered.

Conclusions: Indices of ventilation distribution, FEF25-75, and TLC have the best optimal sensitivity for the diagnosis of infection and rejection after heart-lung transplantation. The high PPV of pulmonary function in detecting allograft dysfunction observed in this study suggests that a diagnostic procedure should be performed whenever one or more functional tests deteriorate; conversely, the low NPV indicates that a stable pulmonary function does not rule out allograft dysfunction.

References

    1. Science. 1979 Aug 24;205(4408):753-9
    1. Respir Physiol. 1984 Jun;56(3):309-25
    1. Thorax. 1988 Oct;43(10):762-9
    1. Transplant Proc. 1989 Feb;21(1 Pt 3):2583-4
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):683-90
    1. Chest. 1992 Sep;102(3):864-70
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Aug;142(2):329-32
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Nov;146(5 Pt 1):1167-72
    1. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Mar-Apr;12(2):308-24
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;152(3):947-52
    1. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995 Jul-Aug;14(4):761-73
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Dec;152(6 Pt 1):2037-43
    1. Chest. 1992 Oct;102(4):1049-54

Source: PubMed

3
購読する