International collaboration between US and Thailand on a clinical trial of treatment for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis

Abstract

Background: International clinical trials can provide scientific and logistic benefits in spite of the many challenges. Determining whether a country, especially a developing country, is an appropriate location for the research should include in-country consultation and partnering to assess its social value for the population; that treatments are relevant for the population under study; and that the research infrastructure and ethical oversight are adequate. Collaboration increases the likelihood of study success and helps ensure that benefits accrue to recruited populations and their community.

Purpose: This paper describes our experiences on a bi-national study and may provide guidance for those planning to engage in future collaborations.

Methods: A Thai and United States team collaborated to develop and implement a phase II clinical trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis to assess safety and tolerability of combination therapy vs. standard treatment. Clinical and cultural differences, regulatory hurdles and operational issues were addressed before and during the study to ensure a successful collaboration between the 2 groups.

Results: The international multicenter study allowed for more rapid enrollment, reduced costs to complete the study, sharing of the benefits of research, greater generalizability of results and capacity building in Thailand; quality metrics in Thailand were equivalent to or better than those in the U.S.

Conclusions: Conducting successful clinical trials internationally requires early and ongoing collaboration to ensure the study meets sites' requirements and expectations, conforms to varying national regulations, adheres to data quality standards and is responsive to the health needs of studied populations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00145249.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

TL Nolen, LO Zimmer, S Pramanpol, ME Walker, D Wallace, P Pappas, P Chetchotisakd: No conflicts of interest

Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1

Diagram of Study Coordination Organization: aA lead Thai investigator was selected to help identify additional sites for the study and to provide in country guidance to the Thai sites. bA Thai member was included in the DSMB to provide input from a Thai perspective on study issues and potential resolutions. cThe clinical site monitors for Thailand were responsible for more activities than typically expected.

Figure 2

Study Timeline

Figure 3

Lag Time Between SAE Occurrence and Reporting to Coordinating Center by Country over Time

Figure 4

CRF Days Overdue by Submission Period and Country