More cost-effective management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders in primary care after direct triaging to physiotherapists for initial assessment compared to initial general practitioner assessment

Lena Bornhöft, Jörgen Thorn, Mikael Svensson, Lena Nordeman, Robert Eggertsen, Maria E H Larsson, Lena Bornhöft, Jörgen Thorn, Mikael Svensson, Lena Nordeman, Robert Eggertsen, Maria E H Larsson

Abstract

Background: A model for triaging patients in primary care to provide immediate contact with the most appropriate profession to treat the condition in question has been developed and implemented in parts of Sweden. Direct triaging of patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) to physiotherapists at primary healthcare centres has been proposed as an alternative to initial assessment by general practitioners (GPs) and has been shown to have many positive effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness from the societal perspective of this new care-pathway through primary care regarding triaging patients with MSD to initial assessment by physiotherapists compared to standard practice with initial GP assessment.

Methods: Nurse-assessed patients with MSD (N = 55) were randomised to initial assessment and treatment with either physiotherapists or GPs and were followed for 1 year regarding health-related quality of life, utilization of healthcare resources and absence from work for MSD. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on EQ5D measured at 5 time-points. Costs for healthcare resources and production loss were compiled. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERS) were calculated. Multiple imputation was used to compensate for missing values and bootstrapping to handle uncertainty. A cost-effectiveness plane and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were construed to describe the results.

Results: The group who were allocated to initial assessment by physiotherapists had slightly larger gains in QALYs at lower total costs. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 €, the likelihood that the intervention was cost-effective from a societal perspective including production loss due to MSD was 85% increasing to 93% at higher thresholds. When only healthcare costs were considered, triaging to physiotherapists was still less costly in relation to health improvements than standard praxis.

Conclusion: From the societal perspective, this small study indicated that triaging directly to physiotherapists in primary care has a high likelihood of being cost-effective. However, further larger randomised trials will be necessary to corroborate these findings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02218749 . Registered August 18, 2014.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; Musculoskeletal disorders; Physiotherapy; Primary care; Triage.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Regional ethical review board in Gothenburg DNR 358–14 with amendment T536–18. All participants provided informed written consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bootstrapped ICERs in the cost-effectiveness plane
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve based on 1000 bootstrapped ICERs

References

    1. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.
    1. Wieser S, Riguzzi M, Pletscher M, Huber CA, Telser H, Schwenkglenks M. How much does the treatment of each major disease cost? A decomposition of Swiss National Health Accounts. Eur J Health Econ. 2018.
    1. Mansson J, Nilsson G, Strender LE, Bjorkelund C. Reasons for encounters, investigations, referrals, diagnoses and treatments in general practice in Sweden--a multicentre pilot study using electronic patient records. Eur J Gen Pract. 2011;17(2):87–94. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2010.538675.
    1. Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144.
    1. Kinge JM, Saelensminde K, Dieleman J, Vollset SE, Norheim OF. Economic losses and burden of disease by medical conditions in Norway. Health Policy. 2017;121(6):691–698. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.020.
    1. Hubertsson J, Englund M, Hallgårde U, Lidwall U, Löfvendahl S, Petersson IF. Sick leave patterns in common musculoskeletal disorders – a study of doctor prescribed sick leave. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-176.
    1. Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29(3):356–373. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.08.002.
    1. Almeida M, Saragiotto B, Richards B, Maher CG. Primary care management of non-specific low back pain: key messages from recent clinical guidelines. Med J Aust. 2018;208(6):272–275. doi: 10.5694/mja17.01152.
    1. Bishop PB, Wing PC. Compliance with clinical practice guidelines in family physicians managing worker's compensation board patients with acute lower back pain. Spine J. 2003;3(6):442–450. doi: 10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00152-9.
    1. Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368–2383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6.
    1. Bornhöft L, Larsson MEH, Nordeman L, Eggertsen R, Thorn J. Health effects of direct triaging to physiotherapists in primary care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders - a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2019;11:1–13. doi: 10.1177/1759720X19827504.
    1. Artus Majid, van der Windt Danielle A, Afolabi Ebenezer K, Buchbinder Rachelle, Chesterton Linda S, Hall Alison, Roddy Edward, Foster Nadine E. Management of shoulder pain by UK general practitioners (GPs): a national survey. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e015711. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015711.
    1. Frese T, Peyton L, Mahlmeister J, Sandholzer H. Knee pain as the reason for encounter in general practice. ISRN family medicine. 2013;2013:930825. doi: 10.5402/2013/930825.
    1. Werner EL, Ihlebaek C. Primary care doctors' management of low back pain patients--ten years after. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012;132(21):2388–2390. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0395.
    1. de Vos Andersen N-B, Kent P, Hjort J, Christiansen DH. Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1487-3.
    1. Childs JD, Whitman JM, Sizer PS, Pugia ML, Flynn TW, Delitto A. A description of physical therapists' knowledge in managing musculoskeletal conditions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-32.
    1. Jette DU, Ardleigh K, Chandler K, McShea L. Decision-making ability of physical therapists: physical therapy intervention or medical referral. Phys Ther. 2006;86(12):1619–1629. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050393.
    1. Ludvigsson ML, Enthoven P. Evaluation of physiotherapists as primary assessors of patients with musculoskeletal disorders seeking primary health care. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(2):131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.04.354.
    1. Bornhoft L, Larsson ME, Thorn J. Physiotherapy in primary care Triage - the effects on utilization of medical services at primary health care clinics by patients and sub-groups of patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a case-control study. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2015;31(1):45–52. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2014.932035.
    1. Frogner BK, Harwood K, Andrilla CHA, Schwartz M, Pines JM. Physical therapy as the first point of care to treat low Back pain: an instrumental variables approach to estimate impact on opioid prescription, health care utilization, and costs. Health Serv Res. 2018.
    1. Goodwin RW, Hendrick PA. Physiotherapy as a first point of contact in general practice: a solution to a growing problem? Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016;17(5):489–502. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000189.
    1. Thorn J, Maun A, Bornhoft L, Kornbakk M, Wedham S, Zaffar M, et al. Increased access rate to a primary health-care Centre by introducing a structured patient sorting system developed to make the most efficient use of the personnel: a pilot study. Health Serv Manag Res. 2010;23(4):166–171. doi: 10.1258/hsmr.2010.010005.
    1. Mackway-Jones K, Marsden J, Emergency Triage WJ. Manchester Triage group, 2nd ed. London: BMJ. 2005.
    1. Joseph C, Morrissey D, Abdur-Rahman M, Hussenbux A, Barton C. Musculoskeletal triage: a mixed methods study, integrating systematic review with expert and patient perspectives. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(4):277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.03.007.
    1. Marks D, Comans T, Bisset L, Scuffham PA. Substitution of doctors with physiotherapists in the management of common musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(4):341–351. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.11.006.
    1. McEvoy Claire, Wiles Louise, Bernhardsson Susanne, Grimmer Karen. Triage for Patients with Spinal Complaints: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Physiotherapy Research International. 2015;22(1):e1639. doi: 10.1002/pri.1639.
    1. EuroQol G. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 1990;16(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
    1. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35(11):1095–1108. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002.
    1. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14(5):487–496. doi: 10.1002/hec.944.
    1. Krol M, Brouwer W. How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(4):335–344. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0132-3.
    1. Pike J, Grosse SD. Friction cost estimates of productivity costs in cost-of-illness studies in comparison with human capital estimates: a review. Applied health economics and health policy. 2018.
    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care Programmes, Fourth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Slade SC, Kent P, Patel S, Bucknall T, Buchbinder R. Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the Management of low Back Pain: a systematic review and Metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(9):800–816. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000324.
    1. Martel-Pelletier J, Maheu E, Pelletier JP, Alekseeva L, Mkinsi O, Branco J, et al. A new decision tree for diagnosis of osteoarthritis in primary care: international consensus of experts. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(1):19–30. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1077-8.
    1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Peat G, Bierma-Zeinstra MA, Arden NK, Bresnihan B, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):483–489. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.113100.
    1. Holdsworth LK, Webster VS, McFadyen AK. What are the costs to NHS Scotland of self-referral to physiotherapy? Results of a national trial. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2006.05.005.
    1. Cowling TE, Majeed A, Harris MJ. Patient experience of general practice and use of emergency hospital services in England: regression analysis of national cross-sectional time series data. BMJ quality & safety. 2018;27(8):643–654. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007174.
    1. Pichlhofer O, Maier M. Unregulated access to health-care services is associated with overutilization--lessons from Austria. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25(3):401–403. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku189.
    1. Blyth FM, March LM, Nicholas MK, Cousins MJ. Self-management of chronic pain: a population-based study. Pain. 2005;113(3):285–292. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.004.
    1. Fritz JM, Magel JS, McFadden M, Asche C, Thackeray A, Meier W, et al. Early physical therapy vs usual Care in Patients with Recent-Onset low Back Pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(14):1459–1467. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11648.
    1. Nordeman L, Nilsson B, Möller M, Gunnarsson R. Early access to physical therapy treatment for subacute low back pain in primary health care: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(6):505–511. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210696.46250.0d.
    1. Rogerson MD, Gatchel RJ, Bierner SM. A cost utility analysis of interdisciplinary early intervention versus treatment as usual for high-risk acute low back pain patients. Pain Pract. 2010;10(5):382–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00344.x.
    1. Leurent B, Gomes M, Carpenter JR. Missing data in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: an incomplete journey. Health Econ. 2018;27(6):1024–1040. doi: 10.1002/hec.3654.
    1. Krol M, Brouwer W, Rutten F. Productivity costs in economic evaluations: past, present, future. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(7):537–549. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0056-3.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する