Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: new perspectives in the diagnostic pathway of non-complicated acute pyelonephritis

Agostino De Pascale, Giorgina Barbara Piccoli, Sandro Massimo Priola, Daniela Rognone, Valentina Consiglio, Irene Garetto, Laura Rizzo, Andrea Veltri, Agostino De Pascale, Giorgina Barbara Piccoli, Sandro Massimo Priola, Daniela Rognone, Valentina Consiglio, Irene Garetto, Laura Rizzo, Andrea Veltri

Abstract

Objectives: The diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis (APN) requires demonstration of parenchymal involvement. When no predisposing conditions are found, non-complicated APN is suspected and CT or MRI should be performed. Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI might be useful, quicker and cheaper than the standard gadolinium-enhanced (GE) MRI. The aim of this study is to compare DW-MRI with GE-MRI to test its diagnostic accuracy in APN.

Methods: Of 318 consecutive patients hospitalised for APN, 279 underwent MRI. Four hundred and fourteen MR studies (first test and follow-up examinations) were gathered and data were processed using Diffusion Analysis software. DW-MRI has been compared with GE-MRI for evaluating diagnostic agreement.

Results: Two hundred and forty-four patients were diagnosed as having APN; 35 were negative. One hundred and sixty-three APN cases were considered non-complicated and selected for the study. Among the 414 MR examinations, comparing DW-MRI with GE-MRI, positive correlation was found in 258 cases, negative in 133. There were 14 false-negatives and 9 false-positives. DW-MRI achieved sensitivity 95.2 %, specificity 94.9 %, positive predictive value 96.9 %, negative predictive value 92.3 % and accuracy 94.6 %.

Conclusions: DW-MRI is reliable for diagnosing non-complicated APN. The high diagnostic agreement between DW-MRI and GE-MRI offers new perspectives in diagnostic management, enabling diagnosis of non-complicated APN without using ionising radiation or contrast media.

Key points: • The diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis (APN) requires demonstration of renal involvement. • Hitherto magnetic resonance imaging required gadolinium enhancement (GE-MRI) to establish this diagnosis. • But diagnostic agreement between diffusion-weighted and GE-MRI offers new diagnostic opportunities. • Quantification of ADC values can help diagnose and monitor APN. • DW-MRI avoids ionising radiation and paramagnetic contrast medium administration.

References

    1. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;11(3):551-81
    1. J Oncol. 2010;2010:
    1. Radiology. 2001 Jan;218(1):101-8
    1. Radiol Med. 2007 Dec;112(8):1201-10
    1. Transplant Proc. 2011 May;43(4):960-6
    1. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Mar 1;71(5):933-42
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):678-81
    1. Br Med J. 1979 Sep 22;2(6192):717-9
    1. BMC Nephrol. 2011 Dec 15;12:68
    1. Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):458-64
    1. Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):199-205
    1. Radiology. 1989 Nov;173(2):423-6
    1. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(7):1034-43
    1. Radiographics. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):255-77; quiz 327-8
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2004 Jan;49(1):76-80
    1. Radiol Med. 2001 Apr;101(4):251-4
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Sep;18(3):377-82
    1. Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):911-7
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Jun;9(6):832-7
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(4):725-34
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 1;52(5):e103-20
    1. Radiographics. 2006 Oct;26 Suppl 1:S205-23
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Feb;11(2):156-60
    1. Radiology. 1994 Aug;192(2):297-305
    1. Clin Imaging. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):432-40
    1. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(6):837-43
    1. BJU Int. 2000 Jul;86 Suppl 1:70-9
    1. Radiol Med. 2010 Mar;115(2):287-300
    1. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Mar;23(1):39-45
    1. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Sep;27(9):3391-4
    1. Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):148-57
    1. Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):398-407
    1. World J Urol. 2004 Nov;22(5):392-8
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 May-Jun;32(3):463-74
    1. Eur Radiol. 2007 Nov;17(11):2780-93
    1. Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):796-807
    1. Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):258-64
    1. Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):711-5
    1. Radiol Med. 2006 Apr;111(3):392-419
    1. Br J Radiol. 2004 Oct;77(922):851-7

Source: PubMed

3
購読する