Haemorrhagia post partum; an implementation study on the evidence-based guideline of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG) and the MOET (Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma-course) instructions; the Fluxim study

Mallory D Woiski, Rosella Pmg Hermens, Johanna M Middeldorp, Jan A Kremer, Marco A Marcus, Maurice Gaj Wouters, Richard P Grol, Fred K Lotgering, Hubertina Cj Scheepers, Mallory D Woiski, Rosella Pmg Hermens, Johanna M Middeldorp, Jan A Kremer, Marco A Marcus, Maurice Gaj Wouters, Richard P Grol, Fred K Lotgering, Hubertina Cj Scheepers

Abstract

Background: One of the most important causes of maternal mortality and severe morbidity worldwide is post partum haemorrhage (PPH). Factors as substandard care are frequently reported in the international literature and there are similar reports in the Netherlands. The incidence of PPH in the Dutch population is 5% containing 10.000 women a year. The introduction of an evidence-based guideline on PPH by the Dutch society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG) and the initiation of the MOET course (Managing Obstetrics Emergencies and Trauma) did not lead to a reduction of PPH. This implies the possibility of an incomplete implementation of both the NVOG guideline and MOET-instructions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop and test a tailored strategy to implement both the NVOG guideline and MOET-instructions

Methods/design: One step in the development procedure is to evaluate the implementation of the guideline and MOET-instructions in the current care. Therefore measurement of the actual care will be performed in a representative sample of 20 hospitals. This will be done by prospective observation of the third stage of labour of 320 women with a high risk of PPH using quality indicators extracted from the NVOG guideline and MOET instructions. In the next step barriers and facilitators for guideline adherence will be analyzed by performance of semi structured interviews with 30 professionals and 10 patients, followed by a questionnaire study among all Dutch gynaecologists and midwives to quantify the barriers mentioned. Based on the outcomes, a tailored strategy to implement the NVOG guideline and MOET-instructions will be developed and tested in a feasibility study in 4 hospitals, including effect-, process- and cost evaluation.

Discussion: This study will provide insight into current Dutch practice, in particular to what extent the PPH guidelines of the NVOG and the MOET-instructions have been implemented in the actual care, and into the barriers and facilitators regarding guideline adherence. The knowledge of the feasibility study regarding the effects and costs of the tailored strategy and the experiences of the users can be used in countries with a relatively high incidence of PPH.

Trial registration: ClinicTrials.gov NCT00928863.

References

    1. Revised 1990 estimates on maternal mortality: a new approach by WHO and UNICEF. 1990. Ref Type: Data File.
    1. Schuitemaker N, van RJ, Dekker G, van DP, van GH, Bennebroek GJ. Confidential enquiry into maternal deaths in The Netherlands 1983-1992. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;79:57–62. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00053-0.
    1. Dutch Perinatal Registration Data. The LVR AND PRN data. 2006.
    1. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van RJ. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study of 371,000 pregnancies. BJOG. 2008;115:842–850. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01713.x.
    1. Guideline: Haemorrhagia Post Partum by the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG) 2005. Ref Type: Data File.
    1. Johanson R, Cox C, Grady K, Howell C, editor. Managing Obstetric Emergency and Trauma; The MOET Course Manual. London: RCOG Press; 2003. Massive Obstetric Haemorrhage; pp. 149–162.
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
    1. Grol R, Wensing M. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice. Oxford, Elsevier; 2005.
    1. Mourad SM, Hermens RP, Nelen WL, Braat DD, Grol RP, Kremer JA. Guideline-based development of quality indicators for subfertility care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2665–2672. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem215.
    1. Campbell SM, Cantrill JA, Roberts D. Prescribing indicators for UK general practice: Delphi consultation study. BMJ. 2000;321:425–428. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.425.
    1. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:443–454. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220070-00002.
    1. Mc Millan T, Hyzy R. Bringing quality improvement into the intensive of care unit. Crit Care. 2007;35(2 Suppl):S59–65.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する