Reliability of measurements of knee extensor muscle strength using a pull-type hand-held dynamometer

Terumi Suzuki, Terumi Suzuki

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliabilities of measurements of knee extensor muscle strength using a pull-type hand-held dynamometer (HHD). [Subjects] Fifty-four healthy adults (35 males; average age, 23 years) participated in this study. [Methods] Knee extensor muscle strength of each leg was measured three times using the HHD. To examine the intra- and inter-examiner reliabilities, measurements were performed by two examiners, a physical therapist and a physical therapy student. [Results] The intra-examiner reliabilities, ICC (1, 1) and ICC (1, 3) ranged from 0.94-0.99. The inter-examiner reliabilities, ICC (2, 1) and ICC (3, 1) ranged from 0.90-0.92 for the right leg, and 0.88-0.90 for the left leg. Neither constant nor proportional errors were found by Bland-Altman analysis. [Conclusion] Intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliabilities were acceptable, indicating that muscle strength can be measured with the pull-type HHD without dependence on skill of measurement. Pain was not caused by measurements with the pull-type HHD.

Keywords: Hand-held dynamometer; Inter-examiner reliability; Intra-examiner reliability.

References

    1. Bohannon RW: Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997, 78: 26–32.
    1. Bohannon RW: Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Phys Ther, 1986, 66: 206–209.
    1. Kelln BM, McKeon PO, Gontkof LM, et al. : Hand-held dynamometry: reliability of lower extremity muscle testing in healthy, physically active, young adults. J Sport Rehabil, 2008, 17: 160–170.
    1. Torborg K, Bandholm T, Schick M, et al. : Hip strength assessment using Handheld dynamometry is subject to intertester bias when tester are of different sex and strength. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2011, 10: 1–7.
    1. Mulroy SJ, Lassen KD, Chambers SH, et al. : The ability of male and female clinicians to effectively test knee extension strength using manual muscle testing. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1997, 26: 192–199.
    1. Deones VL, Wiley SC, Worrell T: Assessment of quadriceps muscle performance by a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1994, 20: 296–301.
    1. Wikholm JB, Bohannon RW: Hand-held dynamometer measurements: tester strength makes a difference. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1991, 13: 191–198.
    1. Lu TW, Hsu HC, Chang LY, et al. : Enhancing the examiner’s resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements: comparison of a new device with hand-held dynamometry. J Rehabil Med, 2007, 39: 679–684.
    1. Brinkmann JR: Comparison of a hand-held and fixed dynamometer in measuring strength of patients with neuromuscular disease. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1994, 19: 100–104.
    1. Gagnon D, Nadeau S, Gravel D, et al. : Reliability and validity of static knee strength measurements obtained with a chair-fixed dynamometer in subjects with hip or knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 86: 1998–2008.
    1. Thorborg K, Bandholm T, Hölmich P: Hip- and knee-strength assessments using a hand-held dynamometer with external belt-fixation are inter-tester reliable. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21: 550–555.
    1. Kramer JF, Vaz MD, Vandervoort AA: Reliability of isometric hip abductor torques during examiner- and belt-resisted tests. J Gerontol, 1991, 46: M47–M51.
    1. Bohannon RW: Make tests and break tests of elbow flexor muscle strength. Phys Ther, 1988, 68: 193–194.
    1. van der Ploeg RJ, Oosterhuis HJ: The “make/break test” as a diagnostic tool in functional weakness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1991, 54: 248–251.
    1. Stratford PW, Balsor BE: A comparison of make and break tests using a hand-held dynamometer and the Kin-Com. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1994, 19: 28–32.
    1. Agre JC, Magness JL, Hull SZ, et al. : Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1987, 68: 454–458.
    1. Knols RH, Aufdemkampe G, de Bruin ED, et al. : Hand-held dynamometry in patients with haematological malignancies: measurement error in the clinical assessment of knee extension strength. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2009, 10: 31.
    1. Koblbauer IF, Lambrecht Y, van der Hulst ML, et al. : Reliability of maximal isometric knee strength testing with modified hand-held dynamometry in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty: useful in research and individual patient settings? A reliability study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12: 249.
    1. Roebroeck ME, Harlaar J, Lankhorst GJ: Reliability assessment of isometric knee extension measurements with a computer-assisted hand-held dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1998, 79: 442–448.
    1. Kropmans TJ, Dijkstra PU, Stegenga B, et al. : Smallest detectable difference in outcome variables related to painful restriction of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res, 1999, 78: 784–789.
    1. Ottenbacher KJ, Johnson MB, Hojem M: The significance of clinical change and clinical change of significance: issues and methods. Am J Occup Ther, 1988, 42: 156–163.
    1. Roebroeck ME, Harlaar J, Lankhorst GJ: The application of generalizability theory to reliability assessment: an illustration using isometric force measurements. Phys Ther, 1993, 73: 386–395, discussion 396–401.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986, 1: 307–310.
    1. Hirasawa Y, Hasegawa T, Matushita K, et al. : Health adult’s isometric knee extension strength. PT J, 2004, 38: 330–332(in Japanese).

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する