Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy

Si Ra Bang, Sang Eun Lee, Hyun Joo Ahn, Jie Ae Kim, Byung Seop Shin, Hee Jin Roe, Woo Seog Sim, Si Ra Bang, Sang Eun Lee, Hyun Joo Ahn, Jie Ae Kim, Byung Seop Shin, Hee Jin Roe, Woo Seog Sim

Abstract

Background: The creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic surgery are associated with respiratory changes. We aimed to compare respiratory mechanics while using intravenous propofol and remifentanil vs. sevoflurane during laparoscopic colectomy.

Methods: SIXTY PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY WERE RANDOMLY ALLOCATED TO ONE OF THE TWO GROUPS: group PR (propofol-remifentanil group; n = 30), and group S (sevoflurane group; n = 30). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), and respiratory resistance (Rrs) values at five different time points: 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia (supine position, T1), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (lithotomy position, T2), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum while in the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (T3), 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and 3 minutes after deflation of pneumoperitoneum (T5).

Results: In both groups, there were significant increases in PIP and Rrs while Cdyn decreased at times T2, T3, and T4 compared to T1 (P < 0.001). The Rrs of group PR for T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher than those measured in group S for the corresponding time points (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Respiratory mechanics can be adversely affected during laparoscopic colectomy. Respiratory resistance was significantly higher during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia than sevoflurane anesthesia.

Keywords: Laparoscopy; Propofol; Remifentanil; Respiratory mechanics; Sevoflurane.

References

    1. da Luz Moreira A, Kiran RP, Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Geisler DP, Church JM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1280–1286.
    1. Degiuli M, Mineccia M, Bertone A, Arrigoni A, Pennazio M, Spandre M, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:427–432.
    1. Henny CP, Hofland J. Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1163–1171.
    1. Puglisi F, Crovace A, Staffieri F, Capuano P, Carravetta G, De Fazio M, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic and respiratory effects of propofol and sevoflurane during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in a swine model. Chir Ital. 2007;59:105–111.
    1. Sivaci R, Orman A, Yilmazer M, Yilmaz S, Ellidokuz H, Polat C. The effect of low-flow sevoflurane and desflurane on pulmonary mechanics during laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005;15:125–129.
    1. Goff MJ, Arain SR, Ficke DJ, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. Absence of bronchodilation during desflurane anesthesia: a comparison to sevoflurane and thiopental. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:404–408.
    1. Habre W, Peták F, Sly PD, Hantos Z, Morel DR. Protective effects of volatile agents against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in rats. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:348–353.
    1. Dikmen Y, Eminoglu E, Salihoglu Z, Demiroluk S. Pulmonary mechanics during isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:745–748.
    1. Farber NE, Pagel PS, Warltier DC. Pulmonary pharmacology. In: Miller RD, editor. Miller's anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. pp. 562–567.
    1. Peratoner A, Nascimento CS, Santana MC, Cadete RA, Negri EM, Gullo A, et al. Effects of propofol on respiratory mechanic and lung histology in normal rats. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:737–740.
    1. Eames WO, Rooke GA, Wu RS, Bishop MJ. Comparison of the effects of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental on respiratory resistance after tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:1307–1311.
    1. Conti G, Dell'Utri D, Vilardi V, De Blasi RA, Pelaia P, Antonelli M, et al. Propofol induces bronchodilation in mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993;37:105–109.
    1. Reves JG, Glass PA, Lubarsky DA, McEvoy MD, Martinez-Ruiz R. Intravenous anesthetics. In: Sessler D, editor. Miller's anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 724.
    1. Willette RN, Barcas PP, Krieger AJ, Sapru HN. Pulmonary resistance and compliance changes evoked by pulmonary opiate receptor stimulation. Eur J Pharmacol. 1983;91:181–188.
    1. Fukuda K. Opioids. In: Sessler D, editor. Miller's anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. pp. 781–782.
    1. Oikkonen M, Tallgren M. Changes in respiratory compliance at laparoscopy: measurements using side stream spirometry. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:495–497.
    1. Hirshman CA, Bergman NA. Factors influencing intrapulmonary airway calibre during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65:30–42.
    1. Warner DO, Vettermann J, Brusasco V, Rehder K. Pulmonary resistance during halothane anesthesia is not determined only by airway caliber. Anesthesiology. 1989;70:453–460.
    1. Mazzeo AJ, Cheng EY, Bosnjak ZJ, Coon RL, Kampine JP. Differential effects of desflurane and halothane on peripheral airway smooth muscle. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:841–846.
    1. Desmond J, Gordon RA. Ventilation in patients anaesthetized for laparoscopy. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1970;17:378–387.
    1. Suh MK, Seong KW, Jung SH, Kim SS. The effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on respiratory mechanics during pelviscopic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;59:329–334.
    1. Salihoglu Z, Demiroluk S, Cakmakkaya S, Gorgun E, Kose Y. Influence of the patient positioning on respiratory mechanics during pneumoperitoneum. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2002;16:521–528.
    1. Kim YB, Chang CH, Kim SY, Nam YT. Effect of BMI and patient positioning on airway pressures and respiratory compliance during laparoscopic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2006;50:302–307.
    1. Chassard D, Berrada K, Tournadre J, Boultéreau P. The effect of neuromuscular block on peak airway pressure and abdominal elastance during pneumoperitoneum. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:525–527.
    1. Yamakage M, Hirshman CA, Croxton TL. Inhibitory effects of thiopental, ketamine, and propofol on voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:1274–1282.
    1. Downes H, Gerber N, Hirshman CA. I.V. lignocaine in reflex and allergic bronchoconstriction. Br J Anaesth. 1980;52:873–878.
    1. Maslow AD, Regan MM, Israel E, Darvish A, Mehrez M, Boughton R, et al. Inhaled albuterol, but not intravenous lidocaine, protects against intubation-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1198–1204.
    1. Vettermann J, Warner DO, Brichant JF, Rehder K. Halothane decreases both tissue and airway resistances in excised canine lungs. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1989;66:2698–2703.
    1. Haeseler G, Störmer M, Bufler J, Dengler R, Hecker H, Piepenbrock S, et al. Propofol blocks human skeletal muscle sodium channels in a voltage-dependent manner. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1192–1198.
    1. Ginz HF, Zorzato F, Iaizzo PA, Urwyler A. Effect of three anaesthetic techniques on isometric skeletal muscle strength. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:367–372.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する