Practical PCR genotyping protocols for Plasmodium vivax using Pvcs and Pvmsp1

Mallika Imwong, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee, Anne Charlotte Grüner, Laurent Rénia, Frank Letourneur, Sornchai Looareesuwan, Nicholas J White, Georges Snounou, Mallika Imwong, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee, Anne Charlotte Grüner, Laurent Rénia, Frank Letourneur, Sornchai Looareesuwan, Nicholas J White, Georges Snounou

Abstract

Background: Plasmodium vivax is the second most prevalent malaria parasite affecting more than 75 million people each year, mostly in South America and Asia. In addition to major morbidity this parasite is associated with relapses and a reduction in birthweight. The emergence and spread of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum is a major factor in the resurgence of this parasite. P. vivax resistance to drugs has more recently emerged and monitoring the situation would be helped, as for P. falciparum, by molecular methods that can be used to characterize parasites in field studies and drug efficacy trials.

Methods: Practical PCR genotyping protocols based on polymorphic loci present in two P. vivax genetic markers, Pvcs and Pvmsp1, were developed. The methodology was evaluated using 100 P. vivax isolates collected in Thailand.

Results and discussion: Analysis revealed that P. vivax populations in Thailand are highly diverse genetically, with mixed genotype infections found in 26 % of the samples (average multiplicity of infection = 1.29). A large number of distinguishable alleles were found for the two markers, 23 for Pvcs and 36 for Pvmsp1. These were generally randomly distributed amongst the isolates. A total of 68 distinct genotypes could be enumerated in the 74 isolates with a multiplicity of infection of 1.

Conclusion: These results indicate that the genotyping protocols presented can be useful in the assessment of in vivo drug efficacy clinical trials conducted in endemic areas and for epidemiological studies of P. vivax infections.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A. Schematic representation of the Pvcs gene, which consists of a conserved region (blank box) flanking a repeated region (grey box) which is itself flanked by pre- and post-repeat specific sequences (cross-hatched boxes). The bold horizontal line represents the PCR-amplified fragment used for further analysis. B. Example of the fragments (denoted A to G) of distinct size observed in different isolates, as single or as mixed infections (some lanes were not labelled because of lack of space). C. Fragments digested (D) or undigested (U) with Alu I or BstN I, two restriction enzymes with multiples sites in VK 210 type or VK247 type repeat sequences, respectively. Digestion cuts the fragment in small fragments of less than 150 bp in size. D. PCR-RFLP using specific restriction enzymes analysis for the presence/absence (yes/no) of specific pre- and post-repeat sequences in fragments carrying the VK210 or VK247 type repeats. Undigested fragments are denoted by (U) and Pr and Po denote digests to determine the presence of pre- and post-repeat sequence types, respectively. A 100 bp ladder, where the 600 bp band stains most intensely, was used a molecular weight marker (M) for all the gels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Allele frequency of the distinct allelic variants of Pvcs observed in the 100 isolates from Thailand. Allelic types were defined according to repeat type (VK210 or VK247), fragment size and the presence or absence of defined pre- and post-repeat sequences.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A. Schematic representation of the Pvmsp1 gene for the localization of interallele conserved blocks (blank boxes) and variable blocks (black boxes). The position of the three amplified segments (F1, F2 and F3) is indicated by the horizontal bold lines. B. Gel electrophoresis of PCR products of a selection of fragments, corresponding to the three segments, amplified from different isolates. The molecular size of the largest and smallest bands are indicated. C. Analysis of the diversity of the F2 segment by PCR-RFLP using Alu I or Mnl I. A selection of lanes is labelled to indicate the type of variant observed (corresponding to the nomenclature in Table 3). A 100 bp ladder was used a molecular weight marker (M) for all the gels.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Alignment of amino acid sequences of amplified F1 and F3 fragments of Pvmsp1. Sequences were aligned against the largest fragment obtained; dots represent identical residues and dashes represent gaps. Sequences obtained during this study are labelled by their GenBank accession numbers, while the Belem and Sal-1 sequences had been previously published (AF435594 and AF435593, respectively).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Allele frequency of the distinct allelic variants of the F2 segment of Pvmsp1 observed in the 100 isolates from Thailand. Allelic variants were defined according to the RFLP patterns observed. A. Variants were divided according to the digestions patterns obtained individually with each of the two restriction enzymes Alu I (a1, a2, etc...) or Mnl I (m1, m2, etc...) for A or B, the two different sized fragments amplified, as in Table 3. B) Variants were classed according to size and the combined RFLP patterns obtained for both restriction enzymes (Alu I and Mnl I), as in Table 4.

References

    1. Mendis K, Sina BJ, Marchesini P, Carter R. The neglected burden of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64:97–106.
    1. Hay SI, Guerra CA, Tatem AJ, Noor AM, Snow RW. The global distribution and population at risk of malaria: past, present, and future. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:327–336. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01043-6.
    1. Nosten F, McGready R, Simpson JA, Thwai KL, Balkan S, Cho T, Hkirijaroen L, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. Effects of Plasmodium vivax malaria in pregnancy. Lancet. 1999;354:546–549. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09247-2.
    1. Trape JF. The public health impact of chloroquine resistance in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64:12–17.
    1. Rieckmann KH, Davis DR, Hutton DC. Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine? Lancet. 1989;2:1183–1184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91792-3.
    1. Baird JK, Basri H, Purnomo. Bangs MJ, Subianto B, Patchen LC, Hoffman SL. Resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax in Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;44:547–552.
    1. Garavelli PL, Corti E. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium vivax: the first case in Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;86:128. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90535-K.
    1. Thaithong S, Chan SW, Songsomboon S, Wilairat P, Seesod N, Sueblinwong T, Goman M, Ridley R, Beale G. Pyrimethamine resistant mutations in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992;52:149–157. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(92)90047-N.
    1. Myat Phone K, Myint O, Myint L, Thaw Z, Kyin Hla A, Nwe Nwe Y. Emergence of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax in Myanmar (Burma) Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993;87:687. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(93)90294-Z.
    1. Murphy GS, Basri H, Purnomo. Andersen EM, Bangs MJ, Mount DL, Gorden J, Lal AA, Purwokusumo AR, Harjosuwarno S, et al. Vivax malaria resistant to treatment and prophylaxis with chloroquine. Lancet. 1993;341:96–100. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92568-E.
    1. Garg M, Gopinathan N, Bodhe P, Kshirsagar NA. Vivax malaria resistant to chloroquine: case reports from Bombay. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89:656–657. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90432-8.
    1. Baird JK, Leksana B, Masbar S, Fryauff DJ, Sutanihardja MA, Suradi. Wignall FS, Hoffman SL. Diagnosis of resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax: timing of recurrence and whole blood chloroquine levels. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;56:621–626.
    1. Pukrittayakamee S, Chantra A, Simpson JA, Vanijanonta S, Clemens R, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. Therapeutic responses to different antimalarial drugs in vivax malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1680–1685. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1680-1685.2000.
    1. Golenda CF, Li J, Rosenberg R. Continuous in vitro propagation of the malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:6786–6791. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6786.
    1. Chotivanich K, Silamut K, Udomsangpetch R, Stepniewska KA, Pukrittayakamee S, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. Ex-vivo short-term culture and developmental assessment of Plasmodium vivax. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:677–680. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90113-0.
    1. Snounou G, Beck HP. The use of PCR-genotyping in the assessment of recrudescence or reinfection after antimalarial treatment. Parasitology today. 1998;14:462–467. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(98)01340-4.
    1. Cui L, Escalante AA, Imwong M, Snounou G. The genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax populations. Trends Parasitol. 2003;19:220–226. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(03)00085-0.
    1. Imwong M, Pukrittakayamee S, Looareesuwan S, Poirriez J, Pasvol G, White NJ, Snounou G. Plasmodium vivax: polymerase chain reaction amplification artifacts limit the suitability of pvgam1 as a genetic marker. Exp Parasitol. 2001;99:175–179. doi: 10.1006/expr.2001.4646.
    1. Bruce MC, Galinski MR, Barnwell JW, Snounou G, Day KP. Polymorphism at the merozoite surface protein-3alpha locus of Plasmodium vivax: global and local diversity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:518–525.
    1. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, do Rosario VE, Thaithong S, Brown KN. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:315–320. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90077-B.
    1. Mann VH, Huang T, Cheng Q, Saul A. Sequence variation in the circumsporozoite protein gene of Plasmodium vivax appears to be regionally biased. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994;68:45–52. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(94)00148-0.
    1. Rongnoparut P, Supsamran N, Sattabongkot J, Suwanabun N, Rosenberg R. Phenotype and genotype diversity in the circumsporozoite proteins of Plasmodium vivax in Thailand. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995;74:201–210. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(95)02504-9.
    1. Rosenberg R, Wirtz RA, Lanar DE, Sattabongkot J, Hall T, Waters AP, Prasittisuk C. Circumsporozoite protein heterogeneity in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Science. 1989;245:973–976.
    1. Mann VH, Good MF, Saul AJ. Diversity in the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium vivax: Does it matter? . Parasitology today. 1995;11:33–36. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(95)80107-3.
    1. del Portillo HA, Longacre S, Khouri E, David PH. Primary structure of the merozoite surface antigen 1 of Plasmodium vivax reveals sequences conserved between different Plasmodium species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:4030–4034.
    1. Gibson HL, Tucker JE, Kaslow DC, Krettli AU, Collins WE, Kiefer MC, Bathurst IC, Barr PJ. Structure and expression of the gene for Pv200, a major blood-stage surface antigen of Plasmodium vivax. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992;50:325–333. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(92)90230-H.
    1. Putaporntip C, Jongwutiwes S, Sakihama N, Ferreira MU, Kho WG, Kaneko A, Kanbara H, Hattori T, Tanabe K. Mosaic organization and heterogeneity in frequency of allelic recombination of the Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-1 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:16348–16353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252348999.
    1. Garnham PC, Bray RS, Bruce-Chwatt LJ, Draper CC, Killick-Kendrick R, Sergiev PG, Tiburskaja NA, Shute PG, Maryon M. A strain of Plasmodium vivax characterized by prolonged incubation: morphological and biological characteristics. Bull World Health Organ. 1975;52:21–32.
    1. Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Renia L, Letourneur F, Charlieu JP, Leartsakulpanich U, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Snounou G. Novel point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase gene of Plasmodium vivax: evidence for sequential selection by drug pressure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:1514–1521. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1514-1521.2003.
    1. Gonzalez-Ceron L, Rodriguez MH, Santillan F, Chavez B, Nettel JA, Hernandez-Avila JE, Kain KC. Plasmodium vivax: ookinete destruction and oocyst development arrest are responsible for Anopheles albimanus resistance to circumsporozoite phenotype VK247 parasites. Exp Parasitol. 2001;98:152–161. doi: 10.1006/expr.2001.4626.
    1. Paul RE, Hackford I, Brockman A, Muller-Graf C, Price R, Luxemburger C, White NJ, Nosten F, Day KP. Transmission intensity and Plasmodium falciparum diversity on the northwestern border of Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:195–203.
    1. Cui L, Mascorro CN, Fan Q, Rzomp KA, Khuntirat B, Zhou G, Chen H, Yan G, Sattabongkot J. Genetic diversity and multiple infections of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Western Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:613–619.
    1. Mayxay M, Pukritrayakamee S, Chotivanich K, Imwong M, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. Identification of cryptic coinfection with Plasmodium falciparum in patients presenting with vivax malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:588–592.
    1. Siripoon N, Snounou G, Yamogkul P, Na-Bangchang K, Thaithong S. Cryptic Plasmodium falciparum parasites in clinical P. vivax blood samples from Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:70–71. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90246-4.
    1. Mayxay M, Pukrittayakamee S, Newton PN, White NJ. Mixed-species malaria infections in humans. Trends Parasitol. 2004;20:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.03.006.
    1. Snounou G, White NJ. The co-existence of Plasmodium: sidelights from falciparum and vivax malaria in Thailand. Trends Parasitol. 2004;20:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.05.004.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する