Temporary intraoperative porto-caval shunt: useless or beneficial in piggy back liver transplantation?
Sebastian Pratschke, Georgios Meimarakis, Christiane J Bruns, Michael Kaspar, Niclas Prix, Reinhart Zachoval, Markus Guba, Karl-Walter Jauch, Florian Loehe, Martin K Angele, Sebastian Pratschke, Georgios Meimarakis, Christiane J Bruns, Michael Kaspar, Niclas Prix, Reinhart Zachoval, Markus Guba, Karl-Walter Jauch, Florian Loehe, Martin K Angele
Abstract
The role of intraoperative porto-caval shunts in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is controversial. Aim of this study was to analyze the effects of an intraoperative, porto-caval catheter-shunt on graft function and survival following cava sparing OLT. Four hundred and forty-eight piggy back liver transplantations with or without a temporary spontaneous porto-caval shunt between 1997 and 2010 were analyzed (shunt n = 274 vs. no shunt n = 174). Lab MELD scores and donor risk indices (DRI) were calculated. Hepatic injury (ALT, AST), -function (bilirubin, prothrombin ratio), postreperfusion liver blood flow and graft survival were registered [mean follow-up: 50.5 (0-163.0) months]. The impact of a shunt on graft survival was determined using multivariate analysis. Usage of a porto-caval shunt was associated with reduced hepatic injury (ALT, AST), whereas graft function was not affected. The shunt group showed a significantly increased portal venous blood flow after reperfusion. Retransplantation rate was decreased (7.7% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.001) and long-term graft survival was significantly increased with a porto-caval shunt (hazard ratio 2.1, P < 0.001). This effect was even more pronounced for marginal organs. Usage of intraoperative porto-caval catheter-shunts is beneficial in cava sparing OLT and is associated with reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury and improved organ survival in particular for recipients of marginal organs.
© 2012 The Authors Transplant International © 2012 European Society for Organ Transplantation.
Source: PubMed