Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1 trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry

Alvin H Li, Amit X Garg, Versha Prakash, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Monica Taljaard, Joanna Mitchell, Danny Matti, Stefanie Linklater, Kyla L Naylor, Stephanie Dixon, Cathy Faulds, Rachel Bevan, Leah Getchell, Greg Knoll, S Joseph Kim, Jessica Sontrop, Lise M Bjerre, Allison Tong, Justin Presseau, Alvin H Li, Amit X Garg, Versha Prakash, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Monica Taljaard, Joanna Mitchell, Danny Matti, Stefanie Linklater, Kyla L Naylor, Stephanie Dixon, Cathy Faulds, Rachel Bevan, Leah Getchell, Greg Knoll, S Joseph Kim, Jessica Sontrop, Lise M Bjerre, Allison Tong, Justin Presseau

Abstract

Background: There is a worldwide shortage of organs available for transplant, leading to preventable mortality associated with end-stage organ disease. While most citizens in many countries with an intent-to-donate "opt-in" system support organ donation, registration rates remain low. In Canada, most Canadians support organ donation but less than 25% in most provinces have registered their desire to donate their organs when they die. The family physician office is a promising yet underused setting in which to promote organ donor registration and address known barriers and enablers to registering for deceased organ and tissue donation. We developed a protocol to evaluate an intervention to promote registration for organ and tissue donation in family physician waiting rooms.

Methods/design: This protocol describes a planned, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized registry trial in six family physician offices in Ontario, Canada to evaluate the effectiveness of reception staff providing patients with a pamphlet that addresses barriers and enablers to registration including a description of how to register for organ donation. An Internet-enabled tablet will also be provided in waiting rooms so that interested patients can register while waiting for their appointments. Family physicians and reception staff will be provided with training and/or materials to support any conversations about organ donation with their patients. Following a 2-week control period, the six offices will cross sequentially into the intervention arm in randomized sequence at 2-week intervals until all offices deliver the intervention. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients visiting the office who are registered organ donors 7 days following their office visit. We will evaluate this outcome using routinely collected registry data from provincial administrative databases. A post-trial qualitative evaluation process will assess the experiences of reception staff and family physicians with the intervention and the stepped-wedge trial design.

Discussion: Promoting registration for organ donation in family physician offices is a potentially useful strategy for increasing registration for organ donation. Increased registration may ultimately help to increase the number of organs available for transplant. The results of this trial will provide important preliminary data on the effectiveness of using family physician offices to promote registration for organ donation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03213171 . Registered on 11 July 2017.

Keywords: Behavior change; Cluster randomized trial; Organ and tissue donation; Organ and tissue donor registration; Protocol; Stepped-wedge trial.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We received ethics approval from Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board to conduct the intervention. We obtained a waiver of consent for data collection of patients because we are not obtaining any identifiable private information from them. We obtained a waiver of consent for study intervention because it was deemed that our intervention posed minimal to no risk to patients. Family physicians will serve as gatekeepers who provide permission for their clinic to be enrolled in our study. We will also obtain written consent to obtain and link their information to routinely collected data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences to identify patients who visit their clinic during the course of the study for evaluating our intervention. More information about our ethics process can be found in the “Ethics” section.

Consent for publication

Not applicable for the study protocol.

Competing interests

Jeremy Grimshaw is the Editor-in-Chief of the Trials journal. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Stepped-wedge design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trial schedule of enrollment, intervention and assessment (as recommended by SPIRIT; Figure displaying schedule of enrollment and interventions)

References

    1. Canadian Organ Replacement Register Annual Report: Treatment of end-stage organ failure in Canada, 2004 to 2013—corr2015_sumhigh_en.pdf [Internet]. Available from: . Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
    1. Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA. 2001;286(1):71–77. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.71.
    1. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Office of the Auditor General of Ontario [Internet]. Available from: . Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
    1. National Organ and Tissue Donation Awareness Week 2016 | Canadian Blood Services [Internet]. Available from: . Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
    1. Rosenblum AM, Li AH, Roels L, Stewart B, Prakash V, Beitel J, et al. Worldwide variability in deceased organ donation registries. Transpl Int. 2012;25:801–811. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01472.x. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.
    1. Thornton JD, Sullivan C, Albert JM, Cedeño M, Patrick B, Pencak J, et al. Effects of a video on organ donation consent among primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(8):832–839. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3630-5.
    1. Purnell TS, Powe NR, Troll MU, Wang N-Y, LaVeist TA, Boulware LE. Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in United States non-designators’ preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs. Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transplant. 2011;24(10):999–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x.
    1. Thornton JD, Curtis JR, Allen MD. Primary care physicians’ attitudes and practices regarding discussing organ donation with their patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102(1):52–58. doi: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30478-8.
    1. Salim A, Berry C, Ley EJ, Schulman D, Anderson J, Navarro S, et al. Improving organ donor registration using kiosks in primary care clinics. Health Educ J. 2015;74(6):758–763. doi: 10.1177/0017896914559854.
    1. Bidigare SA, Ellis AR. Family physicians’ role in recruitment of organ donors. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(7):601–604. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.7.601.
    1. Natt N, Klar E, Cheung I, Matharu P, Bordman R. Increasing organ donor registration in a primary care clinic. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017;6(1):u222401.w8341. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u222401.w8341.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348(mar07 3):g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
    1. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med Publ Soc Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
    1. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
    1. Alvaro EM, Siegel JT, Jones SP. Increasing organ donor registration rates by providing an immediate and complete registration opportunity: an experimental assessment of the IIFF model. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16(6):686–694. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.564353.
    1. Sharpe E, Moloney G, Sutherland M, Judd A. The power of an immediate donor registration opportunity: translating organ donation attitudes into registration behavior. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2017;39(1):49–59. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2016.1249792.
    1. Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol. 1989;44(9):1175. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.
    1. Bandura A. The self system in reciprocal determinism. Am Psychol. 1978;33(4):344. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344.
    1. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(3):220–247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1.
    1. Presseau J, Johnston M, Heponiemi T, Elovainio M, Francis JJ, Eccles MP, et al. Reflective and automatic processes in health care professional behaviour: a dual process model tested across multiple behaviours. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(3):347–358. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9609-8.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13(4):623–649. doi: 10.1080/08870449808407422.
    1. Hooper R, Teerenstra S, de Hoop E, Eldridge S. Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials. Stat Med. Epub 2016. 2016;20;35(26):4718-4728. doi: 10.1002/sim.7028.
    1. Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007.
    1. Kenward MG, Roger JH. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 1997;53(3):983–997. doi: 10.2307/2533558.
    1. Li AH, McArthur E, Maclean J, Isenor C, Prakash V, Kim SJ, et al. Deceased organ donation registration and familial consent among Chinese and South Asians in Ontario. Canada PLOS One. 2015;10(7):e0124321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124321.
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
    1. Grimshaw JM, Presseau J, Tetroe J, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Godin G, et al. Looking inside the black box: results of a theory-based process evaluation exploring the results of a randomized controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians’ diabetic retinopathy referrals [Trial registration number ISRCTN72772651] Implement Sci. 2014;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-86.
    1. Presseau J, Grimshaw JM, Tetroe JM, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Godin G, et al. A theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians’ prescription of thiazide diuretics for hypertension [ISRCTN72772651] Implement Sci. 2016;11:121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0485-4.
    1. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    1. Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, et al. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci IS. 2017;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
    1. McRae AD, Taljaard M, Weijer C. Cluster-randomized trials: a closer look. Clin Trials Lond Engl. 2016;13(3):294–300. doi: 10.1177/1740774516629405.
    1. McRae AD, Weijer C, Binik A, Grimshaw JM, Boruch R, Brehaut JC, et al. When is informed consent required in cluster randomized trials in health research? Trials. 2011;12:202. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-202.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する