Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Toxicity and Biochemical Disease-Free Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Patient Registry

Joanne Davis, Sanjeev Sharma, Richard Shumway, David Perry, Sean Bydder, C Kelley Simpson, David D'Ambrosio, Joanne Davis, Sanjeev Sharma, Richard Shumway, David Perry, Sean Bydder, C Kelley Simpson, David D'Ambrosio

Abstract

Objectives: To report on initial patient characteristics, treatment practices, toxicity, and early biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) of localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and enrolled in the RSSearch(®) Patient Registry.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with clinically localized prostate cancer enrolled in RSSearch(®) from June 2006 - January 2015. Patients were classified as low-risk (PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, T1c-T2a, Gleason score ≤ 6), intermediate-risk (PSA 10.1 - 20 ng/ml, T2b-T2c, or Gleason 7), or high-risk (PSA > 20 ng/ml, T3 or Gleason ≥ 8). Toxicity was reported using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3. Biochemical failure was assessed using the Phoenix definition (nadir + 2 ng/ml). The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate bDFS and association of patient and tumor characteristics with the use of SBRT.

Results: Four hundred thirty-seven patients (189 low, 215 intermediate, and 33 high-risk) at a median of 69 years (range: 48-88) received SBRT at 17 centers. Seventy-eight percent of patients received 36.25 Gy/5 fractions, 13% received 37 Gy/5 fractions, 6% received 35 Gy/5 fractions, 3% received 38 Gy/4 fractions, and 5% received a boost dose of 19.5-29 Gy following external beam radiation therapy. Median follow-up was 20 months (range: 1-64 months). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were minimal, with no acute or late Grade 3+ GU or GI toxicity. Late Grade 1 and 2 urinary frequency was 25% and 8%. Late Grade 1 and 2 proctitis was 3% and 2%. Median PSA decreased from 5.8 ng/ml (range: 0.3-43) to 0.88, 0.4, and 0.3 ng/ml at one, two, and three years. Two-year bDFS for all patients was 96.1%. Two-year bDFS was 99.0%, 94.5%, and 89.8% for low, intermediate, and high-risk patients (p < 0.0001). Two-year bDFS was 99.2%, 93.2%, and 90.4% for Gleason ≤ 6, Gleason 7, and Gleason ≥ 8 (p < 0.0001). Two-year bDFS was 96.4%, 97.2%, and 62.5% for PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, PSA 10.1 - 20 ng/ml, and PSA > 20 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). Clinical T Stage was not significantly associated with bDFS.

Conclusions: Early disease outcomes of SBRT for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer from a multicenter patient registry compare favorably with reports from single institutions. Acute and late GU and GI toxicities were minimal, and PSA response to SBRT was highly encouraging. Continued accrual and follow-up will be necessary to confirm long-term results.

Keywords: aging; disease-free survival; genitourinary malignancies; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; psa; registry; sbrt; stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Median PSA (ng/ml) response at…
Figure 1. Median PSA (ng/ml) response at baseline and at indicated time points after SBRT treatment for all patients.
Interquartiles are shown as error bars.
Figure 2. Rate of biochemical disease-free survival…
Figure 2. Rate of biochemical disease-free survival for low, intermediate, and high-risk patients after SBRT.
Number of subjects for each risk group are shown below, p value

Figure 3. Rate of bDFS stratified by…

Figure 3. Rate of bDFS stratified by Gleason Score (A), pre-treatment PSA (B) and Clinical…

Figure 3. Rate of bDFS stratified by Gleason Score (A), pre-treatment PSA (B) and Clinical T Stage (C).
Number of subjects are shown below. Tick marks indicate censored patients.
Figure 3. Rate of bDFS stratified by…
Figure 3. Rate of bDFS stratified by Gleason Score (A), pre-treatment PSA (B) and Clinical T Stage (C).
Number of subjects are shown below. Tick marks indicate censored patients.

References

    1. Cancer Facts & Figures. [Jun;2015 ];American Cancer Society. 2015 :4.
    1. National Comprehensive Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer. [Jun;2015 ];NCCN) NCCN. 2015
    1. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 Randomized Trial. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Busch C, Nordling S, Haggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S, Spangberg A, Palmgren J, Adami HO, Johansson JE, Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1144–1154.
    1. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Rider JR, Taari K, Busch C, Nordling S, Haggman M, Andersson SO, Spangberg A, Andren O, Palmgren J, Steineck G, Adami HO, Johansson JE. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:932–942.
    1. Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Dearnaley DP, Jovic G, Syndikus I, Khoo V, Cowan RA, Graham JD, Aird EG, Bottomley D, Huddart RA, Jose CC, Matthews JH, Millar JL, Murphy C, Russell JM, Scrase CD, Parmar MK, Sydes MR. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:464–473.
    1. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, Starkschall G, Huang EH, Cheung MR, Lee AK, Pollack A. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:67–74.
    1. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Stephenson RA, Penson DF, Harlan LC. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1358–1367.
    1. Results of a phase II trial of transrectal ultrasound-guided permanent radioactive implantation of the prostate for definitive management of localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (radiation therapy oncology group 98-05) Lawton CA, DeSilvio M, Lee WR, Gomella L, Grignon D, Gillin M, Morton G, Pisansky T, Sandler H. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:39–47.
    1. 12-year outcomes following permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Potters L, Morgenstern C, Calugaru E, Fearn P, Jassal A, Presser J, Mullen E. J Urol. 2005;173:1562–1566.
    1. Multi-institutional analysis of long-term outcome for stages T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implantation. Zelefsky MJ, Kuban DA, Levy LB, Potters L, Beyer DC, Blasko JC, Moran BJ, Ciezki JP, Zietman AL, Pisansky TM, Elshaikh M, Horwitz EM. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:327–333.
    1. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, Lin X, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Mahadevan A, Klein E, Kibel A, Pisters LL, Kuban D, Kaplan I, Wood D, Ciezki J, Shah N, Wei JT. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1250–1261.
    1. What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer? Eade TN, Hanlon AL, Horwitz EM, Buyyounouski MK, Hanks GE, Pollack A. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:682–689.
    1. Toxicity analysis of dose escalation from 75.6 gy to 81.0 gy in prostate cancer. Xu N, Rossi PJ, Jani AB. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34:11–15.
    1. Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43:1095–1101.
    1. A review of alpha/beta ratios for experimental tumors: implications for clinical studies of altered fractionation. Williams MV, Denekamp J, Fowler JF. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985;11:87–96.
    1. What is the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer? Rationale for hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Duchesne GM, Peters LJ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:747–748.
    1. The prospects for new treatments for prostate cancer. Fowler JF, Chappell RJ, Ritter MA. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:3–5.
    1. Is the alpha/beta ratio for prostate tumours really low and does it vary with the level of risk at diagnosis? Fowler JF, Toma-Dasu I, Dasu A. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:1009–1011.
    1. Stereotactic hypofractionated accurate radiotherapy of the prostate (SHARP), 33.5 Gy in five fractions for localized disease: first clinical trial results. Madsen BL, Hsi RA, Pham HT, Fowler JF, Esagui L, Corman J. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:1099–1105.
    1. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer: five-year outcomes. Freeman DE, King CR. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6:3.
    1. Prostate stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy using a standard linear accelerator: toxicity, biochemical, and pathological outcomes. Loblaw A, Cheung P, D'Alimonte L, Deabreu A, Mamedov A, Zhang L, Tang C, Quon H, Jain S, Pang G, Nam R. Radiother Oncol. 2013;107:153–158.
    1. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: pooled analysis from a multi-institutional consortium of prospective phase II trials. King CR, Freeman D, Kaplan I, Fuller D, Bolzicco G, Collins S, Meier R, Wang J, Kupelian P, Steinberg M, Katz A. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109:217–221.
    1. Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma: preliminary results of a multi-institutional phase 1 feasibility trial. McBride SM, Wong DS, Dombrowski JJ, Harkins B, Tapella P, Hanscom HN, Collins SP, Kaplan ID. Cancer. 2012;118:3681–3690.
    1. A single-center study of 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Bolzicco G, Favretto MS, Satariano N, Scremin E, Tambone C, Tasca A. BMC Urol. 2013;13:49.
    1. Multi-institutional registry for prostate cancer radiosurgery: a prospective observational clinical trial. Freeman D, Dickerson G, Perman M. Front Oncol. 2014;4:369.
    1. Quality of Life and Toxicity after SBRT for Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer, a 7-Year Study. Katz AJ, Kang J. Front Oncol. 2014;4:301.
    1. Survey of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in the UK by the QA group on behalf of the UK SABR Consortium. Distefano G, Baker A, Scott AJ, Webster GJ; UK SABR Consortium Quality Assurance Group. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20130681.
    1. A survey of stereotactic body radiotherapy use in the United States. Pan H, Simpson DR, Mell LK, Mundt AJ, Lawson JD. Cancer. 2011;117:4566–4572.
    1. The RSSearchTM Registry: patterns of care and outcomes research on patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy. Davis JN, Medbery Iii C, Sharma S, Danish A, Mahadevan A. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:275.
    1. Stereotactic body radiotherapy as treatment for organ confined low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma, a 7-year study. Katz AJ, Kang J. Front Oncol. 2014;4:240.
    1. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Georgetown University experience. Chen LN, Suy S, Uhm S, Oermann EK, Ju AW, Chen V, Hanscom HN, Laing S, Kim JS, Lei S, Batipps GP, Kowalczyk K, Bandi G, Pahira J, McGeagh KG, Collins BT, Krishnan P, Dawson NA, Taylor KL, Dritschilo A, Lynch JH, Collins SP. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:58.
    1. Phase I dose-escalation study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Boike TP, Lotan Y, Cho LC, Brindle J, DeRose P, Xie XJ, Yan J, Foster R, Pistenmaa D, Perkins A, Cooley S, Timmerman R. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2020–2026.
    1. Long-term outcomes from a prospective trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer. King CR, Brooks JD, Gill H, Presti JC, Jr Jr. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:877–882.
    1. SBRT for the Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: The Effect of Gleason Score, Dose and Heterogeneity of Intermediate Risk on Outcome Utilizing 2.2014 NCCN Risk Stratification Guidelines. Bernetich M, Oliai C, Lanciano R, Hanlon A, Lamond J, Arrigo S, Yang Y, Good M, Feng J, Brown R, Garber B, Mooreville M, Brady LW. Front Oncol. 2014;4:312.
    1. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: disease control and quality of life at 6 years. Katz AJ, Santoro M, Diblasio F, Ashley R. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:118.
    1. Predictors of rectal tolerance observed in a dose-escalated phase 1-2 trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Kim DW, Cho LC, Straka C, Christie A, Lotan Y, Pistenmaa D, Kavanagh BD, Nanda A, Kueplian P, Brindle J, Cooley S, Perkins A, Raben D, Xie XJ, Timmerman RD. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:509–517.
    1. Prostate-specific antigen decline: a major prognostic factor for prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy. Chauvet B, Félix-Faure C, Lupsascka N, Fijuth J, Brewer Y, Davin JL, Kirscher S, Reboul F. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1402–1407.
    1. Use of PSA nadir to predict subsequent biochemical outcome following external beam radiation therapy for T1-2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Zietman AL, Tibbs MK, Dallow KC, Smith CT, Althausen AF, Zlotecki RA, Shipley WU. Radiother Oncol. 1996;40:159–162.
    1. Hypofractionated SBRT versus conventionally fractionated EBRT for prostate cancer: comparison of PSA slope and nadir. Anwar M, Weinberg V, Chang AJ, Hsu IC, Roach M, 3rd 3rd, Gottschalk A. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:42.
    1. Postradiotherapy 2-year prostate-specific antigen nadir as a predictor of long-term prostate cancer mortality. Zelefsky MJ, Shi W, Yamada Y, Kollmeier MA, Cox B, Park J, Seshan VE. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1350–1356.
    1. Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Low or Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: A Markov Model Decision Analysis. Hodges JC, Boike Boike, T. T., Lotan Lotan, Y. Y., Benton Benton, R. R., Pistenmaa Pistenmaa, D.A. D.A., Choy Choy, H. H., Timmerman Timmerman, R R. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:0.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する