Effect of medically lowering intraocular pressure in glaucoma suspects with high myopia (GSHM study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Feng Bin Lin, Shi Da Chen, Yun He Song, Wei Wang, Ling Jin, Bing Qian Liu, Yu Hong Liu, Mei Ling Chen, Kai Gao, David S Friedman, Jost B Jonas, Tin Aung, Lin Lv, Yi Zhi Liu, Xiu Lan Zhang, GSHM study group, Xiu Lan Zhang, Yi Zhi Liu, Lin Lv, David S Friedman, Jost B Jonas, Tin Aung, Shi Da Chen, Wei Wang, Feng Bin Lin, Yun He Song, Fei Li, Kai Gao, Bing Qian Liu, Yu Hong Liu, Mei Ling Chen, Neil M Bressler, Ki Ho Park, Ming Guang He, Ching-Yu Cheng, Paul Healey, Xiang Chen, Guang Xian Tang, Ling Jin, Feng Bin Lin, Shi Da Chen, Yun He Song, Wei Wang, Ling Jin, Bing Qian Liu, Yu Hong Liu, Mei Ling Chen, Kai Gao, David S Friedman, Jost B Jonas, Tin Aung, Lin Lv, Yi Zhi Liu, Xiu Lan Zhang, GSHM study group, Xiu Lan Zhang, Yi Zhi Liu, Lin Lv, David S Friedman, Jost B Jonas, Tin Aung, Shi Da Chen, Wei Wang, Feng Bin Lin, Yun He Song, Fei Li, Kai Gao, Bing Qian Liu, Yu Hong Liu, Mei Ling Chen, Neil M Bressler, Ki Ho Park, Ming Guang He, Ching-Yu Cheng, Paul Healey, Xiang Chen, Guang Xian Tang, Ling Jin

Abstract

Background: Currently, whether and when intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication should be used in glaucoma suspects with high myopia (GSHM) remains unknown. Glaucoma suspects are visual field (VF) defects that cannot be explained by myopic macular changes or other retinal and neurologic conditions. Glaucoma progression is defined by VF deterioration. Here we describe the rationale, design, and methodology of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the effects of medically lowering IOP in GSHM (GSHM study).

Methods: The GSHM study is an open-label, single-center, RCT for GSHM. Overall, 264 newly diagnosed participants, aged 35 to 65 years, will be recruited at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, between 2020 and 2021. Participants will be randomly divided into two arms at a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the intervention arm will receive IOP-lowering medication, while participants in the control arm will be followed up without treatment for 36 months or until they reach the end point. Only one eye per participant will be eligible for the study. If both eyes are eligible, the eye with the worse VF will be recruited. The primary outcome is the incidence of glaucoma suspect progression by VF testing over 36 months. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of changes in the optic nerve head morphology including the retinal nerve fiber layer, and retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer loss, progression of myopic maculopathy, visual function loss, and change in the quality of life. Statistical analyses will include baseline characteristics comparison between the intervention and control groups using a two-sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test; generalized linear models with Poisson regression for the primary outcome; Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test for the incidence of the secondary outcome; and longitudinal analyses to assess trends in outcomes across time.

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, the GSHM study is the first RCT to investigate the impact of medically lowering IOP in GSHM. The results will have implications for the clinical management of GSHM.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04296916 . Registered on 4 March 2020.

Keywords: Glaucoma suspect; High myopia; Intraocular pressure; Randomized controlled trial.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic of the GSHM study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The schematic of the intervention design
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments

References

    1. Fricke TR, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath TJ, Ho SM, et al. Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(7):855–862. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311266.
    1. Wei S, Sun Y, Li S, Hu J, Yang X, Lin C, et al. Refractive errors in university students in Central China: the Anyang University Students Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(11):4691–4700. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24363.
    1. Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, Wei WB, Jonas JB. Prevalence and time trends of myopia in children and adolescents in China: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Retina. 2020;40(3):399–411. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002590.
    1. Sun J, Zhou J, Zhao P, Lian J, Zhu H, Zhou Y, et al. High prevalence of myopia and high myopia in 5060 Chinese university students in Shanghai. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(12):7504–7509. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8343.
    1. Marcus MW, de Vries MM, Junoy Montolio FG, Jansonius NM. Myopia as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(10):1989–1994. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.012.
    1. Pan CW, Cheung CY, Aung T, Cheung CM, Zheng YF, Wu RY, et al. Differential associations of myopia with major age-related eye diseases: the Singapore Indian Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(2):284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.065.
    1. Jonas JB, Nagaoka N, Fang YX, Weber P, Ohno-Matsui K. Intraocular pressure and glaucomatous optic neuropathy in high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(13):5897–5906. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21942.
    1. Jonas JB, Weber P, Nagaoka N, Ohno-Matsui K. Glaucoma in high myopia and parapapillary delta zone. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175120.
    1. Tan NYQ, Sng CCA, Jonas JB, Wong TY, Jansonius NM, Ang M. Glaucoma in myopia: diagnostic dilemmas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(10):1347–1355. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313530.
    1. Prum BE, Jr, Lim MC, Mansberger SL, Stein JD, Moroi SE, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma suspect preferred practice pattern((R)) guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):112–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.055.
    1. Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M, Suzuki Y, Abe H, Shirato S, et al. The Tajimi study report 2: prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(10):1661–1669. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.012.
    1. Agis Investigators The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–440. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00538-9.
    1. Group CN Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):487–497. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00223-2.
    1. El-Nimri NW, Wildsoet CF. Effects of topical latanoprost on intraocular pressure and myopia progression in young Guinea pigs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(6):2644–2651. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22890.
    1. Xu L, Wang Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Jonas JB. High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility the Beijing eye study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):216–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.050.
    1. Wolf S, Balciuniene VJ, Laganovska G, Menchini U, Ohno-Matsui K, Sharma T, et al. RADIANCE: a randomized controlled study of ranibizumab in patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(3):682–692. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.023.
    1. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(11):2144–2153. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90497-9.
    1. Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB, Cheung CM, Saw SM, Verhoeven VJ, et al. International photographic classification and grading system for myopic maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(5):877–883. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.022.
    1. Li Z, Liu R, Xiao O, Guo X, Wang D, Zhang J, et al. Progression of myopic maculopathy in highly myopic Chinese eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(4):1096–1104. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25800.
    1. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(10):1268–1279. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268.
    1. Garway-Heath DF, Crabb DP, Bunce C, Lascaratos G, Amalfitano F, Anand N, et al. Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9975):1295–1304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62111-5.
    1. Garway-Heath DF, Lascaratos G, Bunce C, Crabb DP, Russell RA, Shah A. The United Kingdom Glaucoma treatment study: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial: design and methodology. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.028.
    1. D'Agostino RB, Chase W, Belanger A. The appropriateness of some common procedures for testing the equality of two independent binomial populations. Am Stat. 1988;42(3):198–202.
    1. Chow SC, Wang H, Shao J. Sample size calculations in clinical research. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003.
    1. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3. New York: Wiley; 2003.
    1. Lachin JM. Biostatistical methods: the assessment of relative risks. New York: Wiley; 2000.
    1. Machin D, Campbell MJ, Tan SB, Tan SH. Sample size tables for clinical studies. 3. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
    1. Lalezary M, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Sample PA, Tavares IM, et al. Baseline optical coherence tomography predicts the development of glaucomatous change in glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(4):576–582. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.004.
    1. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Anderson DR, Levine RA, Fan J, Cello KE, et al. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(9):1603–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.061.
    1. Farida FM, Farahat HG, Salem MS. Refraction errors in school children. Menoufia Med J. 2018;31(1):293–298.
    1. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J. 2004;4(3):227–241. doi: 10.4103/mmj.mmj_115_17.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する