TheraPearl Eye Mask and Blephasteam for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized, comparative clinical trial

Jonatan Olafsson, Xiaoran Lai, Erlend Christoffer Sommer Landsend, Snorri Olafsson, Eric Parissi, Øygunn A Utheim, Sten Raeder, Reza A Badian, Neil Lagali, Darlene A Dartt, Tor P Utheim, Jonatan Olafsson, Xiaoran Lai, Erlend Christoffer Sommer Landsend, Snorri Olafsson, Eric Parissi, Øygunn A Utheim, Sten Raeder, Reza A Badian, Neil Lagali, Darlene A Dartt, Tor P Utheim

Abstract

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the most common cause of dry eye disease (DED). In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of eyelid warming treatment using either TheraPearl Eye Mask (Bausch & Lomb Inc., New York, USA) or Blephasteam (Spectrum Thea Pharmaceuticals LTD, Macclesfield, UK) in a Norwegian population with mild to moderate MGD-related DED. An open label, randomized comparative trial with seventy patients (49 females, 21 males; mean age 53.6 years). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with Blephasteam (n = 37) or TheraPearl (n = 33). All received a hyaluronic acid based artificial tear substitute (Hylo-Comod, Ursapharm, Saarbrücken, Germany). Patients were examined at baseline, and at three and six months initiation of treatment. Treatment efficacy was primarily evaluated by fluorescein breakup time (FBUT) and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores. Other outcome measures included ocular surface staining (OSS), Schirmer's test, and meibomian quality and expressibility. Baseline parameter values did not differ between the groups. After six months of treatment, Blephasteam improved FBUT by 3.9 s (p < 0.01) and OSDI by 13.7 (p < 0.01), TheraPearl improved FBUT by 2.6 s (p < 0.01) and OSDI by 12.6 (p < 0.01). No difference between treatments was detected at 6 months (p = 0.11 for FBUT and p = 0.71 for OSDI), nor were there differences in the other tested parameters between the treatment groups. Blephasteam and TheraPearl are equally effective in treating mild to moderate MGD in a Norwegian population after 6-months of treatment.Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03318874; Protocol ID: 2014/1983; First registration: 24/10/2017.

Conflict of interest statement

Snorri Olafsson is on the speaker bureau for Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Tor Paaske Utheim is co-founder and co-owner of The Norwegian dry eye clinic, which delivers talks for and/or receives financial support from the following: ABIGO, Alcon, Allergan, AMWO, Bausch&Lomb, European school for advanced studies in ophthalmology, InnZ Medical, Medilens Nordic, Medistim, Novartis, Santen, Specsavers, Shire and Thea Laboratoires. He has served on the global scientific advisory board for Novartis and Alcon as well as the European advisory board for Shire. Utheim is the Norwegian Global Ambassador for Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) and a board member of the International Ocular Surface Society. Sten Raeder has financial disclosers for Abigo, Alcon, AMWO, Bausch & Lomb, Medilens, Medistim, Novartis, Santen, Théa. In addition, he has co-founded the Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic. Darlene Dartt is a consultant for Coopervision. Jonatan Olafsson, Xiaoran Lai, Erlend Christoffer Sommer Landsend, Eric Parissi, Reza A. Badian, and Neil Lagali have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Blephasteam (Spectrum Thea Pharmaceuticals LTD, Macclesfield, UK) warms the eyelids by turning water in cotton rings into steam while placed over the eyes for 10 min. Figure created in Affinity Designer version 1.8 (Serif (Europe) Ltd., Nottingham, UK).
Figure 2
Figure 2
TheraPearl eye mask (Bausch & Lomb Inc., New York, USA) is preheated in a microwave before being placed on the eyelids for about 10–15 min. Figure created in Affinity Designer version 1.8 (Serif (Europe) Ltd., Nottingham, UK).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient inclusion, treatment allocation, and dropout. Figure created in PowerPoint version 16.53 (Microsoft, Washington, USA).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Compliance calculated as the average number of days per week that the patients were using the treatment. Smoothed conditional mean compliance were fitted using loess method for each treatment. 95% confidence bands were shown as shaded ribbon in respective colors. Figure created in R version 4.0 with ggplot2 package, version 3.3.5 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria).

References

    1. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul. Surf. 2017;15(3):334–365.
    1. Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(4):1930–1937.
    1. Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(4):1938–1978.
    1. Blackie CA, Carlson AN, Korb DR. Treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye symptoms with a single-dose vectored thermal pulsation: A review. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2015;26(4):306–313.
    1. Butovich IA, Millar TJ, Ham BM. Understanding and analyzing meibomian lipids—A review. Curr. Eye Res. 2008;33(5):405–420.
    1. Borchman D, Foulks GN, Yappert MC, et al. Human meibum lipid conformation and thermodynamic changes with meibomian-gland dysfunction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(6):3805–3817.
    1. Ong BL, Larke JR. Meibomian gland dysfunction: Some clinical, biochemical and physical observations. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 1990;10(2):144–148.
    1. Nagymihalyi A, Dikstein S, Tiffany JM. The influence of eyelid temperature on the delivery of meibomian oil. Exp. Eye Res. 2004;78(3):367–370.
    1. Terada O, Chiba K, Senoo T, Obara Y. Ocular surface temperature of meibomia gland dysfunction patients and the melting point of meibomian gland secretions. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2004;108(11):690–693.
    1. Geerling G, Tauber J, Baudouin C, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Report of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(4):2050–2064.
    1. Arita R, Morishige N, Sakamoto I, et al. Effects of a warm compress containing menthol on the tear film in healthy subjects and dry eye patients. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45848.
    1. Badawi D. A novel system, TearCare(®), for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2018;12:683–694.
    1. Bilkhu PS, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS. Effect of a commercially available warm compress on eyelid temperature and tear film in healthy eyes. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2014;91(2):163–170.
    1. Lane SS, DuBiner HB, Epstein RJ, et al. A new system, the LipiFlow, for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2012;31(4):396–404.
    1. Ngo W, Srinivasan S, Jones L. An eyelid warming device for the management of meibomian gland dysfunction. J. Optom. 2019;12(2):120–130.
    1. Pult H, Riede-Pult BH, Purslow C. A comparison of an eyelid-warming device to traditional compress therapy. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2012;89(7):E1035–E1041.
    1. Tan J, Ho L, Wong K, et al. The effects of a hydrating mask compared to traditional warm compresses on tear film properties in meibomian gland dysfunction. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(1):83–87.
    1. Tichenor AA, Cox SM, Ziemanski JF, et al. Effect of the Bruder moist heat eye compress on contact lens discomfort in contact lens wearers: An open-label randomized clinical trial. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. 2019;42(6):625–632.
    1. Villani E, Garoli E, Canton V, et al. Evaluation of a novel eyelid-warming device in meibomian gland dysfunction unresponsive to traditional warm compress treatment: An in vivo confocal study. Int. Ophthalmol. 2015;35(3):319–323.
    1. Blackie CA, Solomon JD, Greiner JV, et al. Inner eyelid surface temperature as a function of warm compress methodology. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2008;85(8):675–683.
    1. Goto E, Endo K, Suzuki A, et al. Improvement of tear stability following warm compression in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2002;506(Pt B):1149–1152.
    1. Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Goto E, et al. Efficacy of a new warm moist air device on tear functions of patients with simple meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2006;25(6):644–650.
    1. Mori A, Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, et al. Disposable eyelid-warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;47(6):578–586.
    1. Olson MC, Korb DR, Greiner JV. Increase in tear film lipid layer thickness following treatment with warm compresses in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(2):96–99.
    1. Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report. Ocul. Surf. 2017;15(3):575–628.
    1. Korb DR, Blackie CA. Meibomian gland diagnostic expressibility: Correlation with dry eye symptoms and gland location. Cornea. 2008;27(10):1142–1147.
    1. Blackie CA, Korb DR, Knop E, et al. Nonobvious obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2010;29(12):1333–1345.
    1. Murakami DK, Blackie CA, Korb DR. All warm compresses are not equally efficacious. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2015;92(9):e327–e333.
    1. Doan S, Chiambaretta F, Baudouin C, Group Es Evaluation of an eyelid warming device (Blephasteam) for the management of ocular surface diseases in France: The ESPOIR study. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 2014;37(10):763–772.
    1. Benitez Del Castillo JM, Kaercher T, Mansour K, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2014;8:2019–2027.
    1. Purslow C. Evaluation of the ocular tolerance of a novel eyelid-warming device used for meibomian gland dysfunction. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(5):226–231.
    1. Sim HS, Petznick A, Barbier S, et al. A randomized, controlled treatment trial of eyelid-warming therapies in meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2014;3(1–2):37–48.
    1. Mitra M, Menon GJ, Casini A, et al. Tear film lipid layer thickness and ocular comfort after meibomian therapy via latent heat with a novel device in normal subjects. Eye (Lond) 2005;19(6):657–660.
    1. Bitton E, Lacroix Z, Leger S. In-vivo heat retention comparison of eyelid warming masks. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(4):311–315.
    1. Lacroix Z, Leger S, Bitton E. Ex vivo heat retention of different eyelid warming masks. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(3):152–156.
    1. Bilkhu PS, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS. Randomised masked clinical trial of the MGDRx EyeBag for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction-related evaporative dry eye. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;98(12):1707–1711.
    1. Wang MT, Jaitley Z, Lord SM, Craig JP. Comparison of self-applied heat therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2015;92(9):e321–e326.
    1. Yeo S, Tan JH, Acharya UR, et al. Longitudinal changes in tear evaporation rates after eyelid warming therapies in meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(4):1974–1981.
    1. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, et al. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):615–621.
    1. Bron AJ. Diagnosis of dry eye. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2001;45(Suppl 2):S221–S226.
    1. Ousler GW, 3rd, Hagberg KW, Schindelar M, et al. The ocular protection index. Cornea. 2008;27(5):509–513.
    1. Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22(7):640–650.
    1. Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Executive summary. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(4):1922–1929.
    1. Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(4):2006–2049.
    1. Kang M, Ragan BG, Park JH. Issues in outcomes research: An overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials. J. Athl. Train. 2008;43(2):215–221.
    1. Miller KL, Walt JG, Mink DR, et al. Minimal clinically important difference for the ocular surface disease index. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2010;128(1):94–101.
    1. Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul. Surf. 2017;15(3):539–574.
    1. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin. Trials. 1989;10(4):407–415.
    1. Turner AW, Layton CJ, Bron AJ. Survey of eye practitioners' attitudes towards diagnostic tests and therapies for dry eye disease. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2005;33(4):351–355.
    1. Smith J, Nichols KK, Baldwin EK. Current patterns in the use of diagnostic tests in dry eye evaluation. Cornea. 2008;27(6):656–662.
    1. Graham JE, McGilligan VE, Berrar D, et al. Attitudes towards diagnostic tests and therapies for dry eye disease. Ophthalmic Res. 2010;43(1):11–17.
    1. Cardona G, Serés C, Quevedo L, Augé M. Knowledge and use of tear film evaluation tests by Spanish practitioners. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2011;88(9):1106–1111.
    1. Downie LE, Keller PR, Vingrys AJ. An evidence-based analysis of Australian optometrists' dry eye practices. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2013;90(12):1385–1395.
    1. Mengher LS, Bron AJ, Tonge SR, Gilbert DJ. Effect of fluorescein instillation on the pre-corneal tear film stability. Curr. Eye Res. 1985;4(1):9–12.
    1. Mooi JK, Wang MTM, Lim J, et al. Minimising instilled volume reduces the impact of fluorescein on clinical measurements of tear film stability. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(3):170–174.
    1. Bron AJ, Argüeso P, Irkec M, Bright FV. Clinical staining of the ocular surface: Mechanisms and interpretations. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2015;44:36–61.
    1. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Abetz L, et al. The relationship between habitual patient-reported symptoms and clinical signs among patients with dry eye of varying severity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44(11):4753–4761.
    1. Wang MTM, et al. Therapeutic profile of a latent heat eyelid warming device with temperature setting variation. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(2):173–177.
    1. The epidemiology of dry eye disease Report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007) Ocul. Surf. 2007;5(2):93–107.
    1. Bradley JL, Özer Stillman I, Pivneva I, et al. Dry eye disease ranking among common reasons for seeking eye care in a large US claims database. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2019;13:225–232.
    1. Apotekhjem. TheraPearl øyemaske. 2021; v. 2021.
    1. Apotekhjem. Blephasteam fuktkammerbriller. 2021; v. 2021.
    1. Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for MGD. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(4):1994–2005.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する