Concurrent radiotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidine versus gemcitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yong-Feng Yang, Xiao-Hui Cao, Chao-En Bao, Xin Wan, Yong-Feng Yang, Xiao-Hui Cao, Chao-En Bao, Xin Wan

Abstract

Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) is the most widely utilized systemic agent in combination with radiation therapy (RT) for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) in the concurrent setting. Despite recent interest in using two novel oral fluoropyrimidines (FUs), capecitabine and S-1, in this setting, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support this approach.

Methods: Trials published between 1994 and 2014 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library). All prospective studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment response, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively), and toxicities were extracted and analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software (version 2.0).

Results: Twenty-three cohorts with 843 patients were included: 497 patients were treated with GEM and 346 patients were treated with oral FU. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 and 2 years for S-1 plus RT than for GEM plus RT (relative risk [RR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.65; P=0.03; and RR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.18-2.60, P=0.002, respectively), while 1-year PFS and ORR were not significantly different between S-1 and GEM-based chemoradiotherapy (P=0.37 and P=0.06, respectively). Additionally, comparable efficacy was found between capecitabine and GEM-based chemoradiotherapy in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR. As for grade 3 and 4 acute toxicity, oral FU plus RT significantly reduced the risk of developing hematologic toxicities, nausea, and vomiting when compared to GEM plus RT (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Oral FU plus RT may be a safe and feasible regimen for patients with LAPC, with similar efficacy and low rate of toxicities compared with GEM plus RT. Our findings support the need to compare S-1 with GEM in the concurrent setting in large prospective RCTs due to its potential survival benefits.

Keywords: chemoradiotherapy; gemcitabine; meta-analysis; oral fluoropyrimidine; pancreatic cancer.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection process for clinical trials included in the meta-analysis. Abbreviation: CRT, chemoradiotherapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selected methodological quality indicator.

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.
    1. Burris HA, 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(6):2403–2413.
    1. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group Treatment of locally unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas: comparison of combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) to chemotherapy alone. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(10):751–755.
    1. Loehrer PJ, Sr, Feng Y, Cardenes H, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(31):4105–4112.
    1. Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000–01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(9):1592–1599.
    1. Moertel CG, Frytak S, Hahn RG, et al. the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group Therapy of locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized comparison of high dose (6000 rads) radiation alone, moderate dose radiation (4000 rads + 5-fluorouracil), and high dose radiation + 5-fluorouracil. Cancer. 1981;48(8):1705–1710.
    1. de Lange SM, van Groeningen CJ, Meijer OW, et al. Gemcitabine-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(9):1212–1217.
    1. Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Crane CH, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3487–3495.
    1. Li CP, Chao Y, Chi KH, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(1):98–104.
    1. Park JK, Ryu JK, Lee JK, et al. Gemcitabine chemotherapy versus 5-fluorouracil-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2006;33(4):397–402.
    1. Zhu CP, Shi J, Chen YX, Xie WF, Lin Y. Gemcitabine in the chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2011;99(2):108–113.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–341.
    1. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa, ON: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2014. [Accessed August 22, 2014]. Available from: .
    1. Sterzing F, Brunner TB, Ernst I, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors: principles and practical guidelines of the DEGRO Working Group on Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014;190(10):872–881.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ. 2003;326(7382):219.
    1. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463.
    1. Mukherjee S, Hurt CN, Bridgewater J, et al. Gemcitabine-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(4):317–326.
    1. Kim YJ, Lee WJ, Woo SM, et al. Comparison of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:160.
    1. Ikeda M, Ioka T, Ito Y, et al. A multicenter phase II trial of S-1 with concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85(1):163–169.
    1. Wang BH, Cao WM, Yu J, Wang XL. Gemcitabine-based concurrent chemo-radiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):2129–2132.
    1. Shinchi H, Maemura K, Mataki Y, et al. A phase II study of oral S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy with S-1 alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19(2):152–158.
    1. Sudo K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, et al. Phase II study of oral S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(1):119–125.
    1. Huang J, Robertson JM, et al. Long-term results of full-dose gemcitabine with radiation therapy compared to 5-fluorouracil with radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreas cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2011;99(2):114–119.
    1. Cardenes HR, Moore AM, et al. A phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with radiation therapy in patients with localized, unresectable, pancreatic cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011;34(5):460–465.
    1. Kim HS, Yi SY, Jun HJ, et al. Definitive chemoradiation therapy with capecitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2010;21(1):107–112.
    1. Jackson AS, Jain P, Watkins GR, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of limited field radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010;22(7):570–577.
    1. Kim HM, Bang S, Park JY, et al. Phase II trial of S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;63(3):535–541.
    1. Small W, Jr, Berlin J, Freedman GM, et al. Full-dose gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(6):942–947.
    1. Yamazaki H, Nishiyama K, Koizumi M, et al. Concurrent chemoradio-therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine can be administered using limited-field radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2007;183(6):301–306.
    1. Saif MW, Black G, Roy S, et al. Phase II study of capecitabine with concomitant radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase. Cancer J. 2007;13(4):247–256.
    1. Murphy JD, Adusumilli S, Griffith KA, et al. Full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(3):801–808.
    1. Magnino A, Gatti M, Massucco P, et al. Phase II trial of primary radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2005;68(4–6):493–499.
    1. Okusaka T, Ito Y, Ueno H, et al. Phase II study of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(4):673–677.
    1. Blackstock AW, Tepper JE, Niedwiecki D, Hollis DR, Mayer RJ, Tempero MA. Cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 89805: phase II chemoradiation trial using gemcitabine in patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2003;34(2–3):107–116.
    1. Epelbaum R, Rosenblatt E, Nasrallah S, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy in patients with localized, unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2002;81(3):138–143.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network [webpage on the Internet] Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines) pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2014. [Accessed October 10, 2014]. Available from: .
    1. Tada M, Arizumi T, Nakai Y, et al. Efficacy of gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: comparison with 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy. 2008;54(4):302–308.
    1. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(1):1–9.
    1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する