Effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on naming abilities in early-stroke aphasic patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study

Konrad Waldowski, Joanna Seniów, Marcin Leśniak, Szczepan Iwański, Anna Członkowska, Konrad Waldowski, Joanna Seniów, Marcin Leśniak, Szczepan Iwański, Anna Członkowska

Abstract

Background and purpose: Functional brain imaging studies with aphasia patients have shown increased cortical activation in the right hemisphere language homologues, which hypothetically may represent a maladaptive strategy that interferes with aphasia recovery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the Broca's homologues in combination with speech/language therapy improves naming in early-stroke aphasia patients.

Methods: 26 right-handed aphasic patients in the early stage (up to 12 weeks) of a first-ever left hemisphere ischemic stroke were randomized to receive speech and language therapy combined with real or sham rTMS. Prior to each 45-minute therapeutic session (15 sessions, 5 days a week), 30 minutes of 1-Hz rTMS was applied. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, immediately after 3 weeks of experimental treatment and 15 weeks; posttreatment using the Computerized Picture Naming Test.

Results: Although both groups significantly improved their naming abilities after treatment, no significant differences were noted between the rTMS and sham stimulation groups. The additional analyses have revealed that the rTMS subgroup with a lesion including the anterior part of language area showed greater improvement primarily in naming reaction time 15 weeks after completion of the therapeutic treatment. Improvement was also demonstrated in functional communication abilities.

Conclusions: Inhibitory rTMS of the unaffected right inferior frontal gyrus area in combination with speech and language therapy cannot be assumed as an effective method for all poststroke aphasia patients. The treatment seems to be beneficial for patients with frontal language area damage, mostly in the distant time after finishing rTMS procedure.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subjects mean scores on the six-point Severity Rating Scale from the BDAE at baseline and 15 weeks post-treatment.

References

    1. Heiss WD, Kessler J, Thiel A, Ghaemi M, Karbe H. Differential capacity of left and right hemispheric areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia. Annals of Neurology. 1999;45(4):430–438.
    1. Netz J, Ziemann U, Homberg V. Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosalinhibition in man. Experimental Brain Research. 1995;104(3):527–533.
    1. Netz J. Asymmetry in transcallosal inhibition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Supplement. 1999;51:137–144.
    1. Thiel A, Schumacher B, Wienhard K, et al. Direct demonstration of transcallosal disinhibition in language networks. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2006;26(9):1122–1127.
    1. Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Drivers of brain plasticity. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2005;18(6):667–674.
    1. Rijntjes M. Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: new insights, old questions and the meaning of therapies. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2006;19(1):76–83.
    1. Karbe H, Kessler J, Herholz K, Fink GR, Heiss WD. Long-term prognosis of poststroke aphasia studied with positron emission tomography. Archives of Neurology. 1995;52(2):186–190.
    1. Rosen HJ, Petersen SE, Linenweber MR, et al. Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex. Neurology. 2000;55(12):1883–1894.
    1. Heiss WD, Thiel A. A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia. Brain and Language. 2006;98(1):118–123.
    1. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain. 2006;129(6):1371–1384.
    1. Belin P, Van Eeckhout P, Zilbovicius M, et al. Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study. Neurology. 1996;47(6):1504–1511.
    1. Wierenga CE, Maher LM, Moore AB, et al. Neural substrates of syntactic mapping treatment: an fMRI study of two cases. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2006;12(1):132–146.
    1. Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurology. 2006;5(8):708–712.
    1. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Ho M, et al. Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2009;9(6):451–458.
    1. Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997;48(5):1398–1403.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Tormos JM, Keenan J, Tarazona F, Cañete C, Catalá MD. Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 1998;15(4):333–343.
    1. Sparing R, Mottaghy FM, Hungs M, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on language function depend on the stimulation parameters. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2001;18(4):326–330.
    1. Kobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurology. 2003;2(3):145–156.
    1. Crinion JT, Leff AP. Recovery and treatment of aphasia after stroke: functional imaging studies. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2007;20(6):667–673.
    1. Fridriksson J, Bonilha L, Baker JM, Moser D, Rorden C. Activity in preserved left hemisphere regions predicts anomia severity in aphasia. Cerebral Cortex. 2010;20(5):1013–1019.
    1. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Theoret H, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language. 2004;25(2):181–191.
    1. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: an open-protocol study. Brain and Language. 2005;93(1):95–105.
    1. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient—case report. Neurocase. 2005;11(3):182–193.
    1. Hamilton RH, Sanders L, Benson J, et al. Stimulating conversation: enhancement of elicited propositional speech in a patient with chronic non-fluent aphasia following transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain and Language. 2010;113(2):45–50.
    1. Barwood CHS, Murdoch BE, Whelan BM, et al. Modulation of N400 in chronic non-fluent aphasia using low frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Brain and Language. 2011;116(3):125–135.
    1. Barwood CHS, Murdoch BE, Whelan BM, et al. Improved language performance subsequent to low-frequency rTMS in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia post-stroke. European Journal of Neurology. 2011;18(7):935–943.
    1. Weiduschat N, Thiel A, Rubi-Fessen I, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2011;42(2):409–415.
    1. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.
    1. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1994;91(2):79–92.
    1. Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1998;108(1):1–16.
    1. Tranulis C, Guéguen B, Pham-Scottez A, et al. Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: comparison of three estimation methods. Neurophysiologie Clinique. 2006;36(1):1–7.
    1. Walsh V, Rushworth M. A primer of magnetic stimulation as a tool for neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia. 1998;37(2):125–135.
    1. Gough PM, Nobre AC, Devlin JT. Dissociating linguistic processes in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;25(35):8010–8016.
    1. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
    1. Kądzielawa D. Specyficzne problemy adaptacji testów klinicznych. Testy neuropsychologiczne. In: Ciechanowicz A, editor. Kulturowa Adaptacja Testów. Warsaw, Poland: PTP; 1990.
    1. Spatz HC. Hebb’s concept of synaptic plasticity and neuronal cell assemblies. Behavioural Brain Research. 1996;78(1):3–7.
    1. Bi GQ, Poo MM. Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb’s postulate revisited. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2001;24:139–166.
    1. Robertson IH, Murre JMJ. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychological Bulletin. 1999;125(5):544–575.
    1. Schnur TT, Schwartz MF, Kimberg DY, Hirshorn E, Coslett HB, Thompson-Schill SL. Localizing interference during naming: convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca’s area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(1):322–327.
    1. Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1229–1236.
    1. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Ho M, et al. Overt naming fMRI pre- and post-TMS: two nonfluent aphasia patients, with and without improved naming post-TMS. Brain and Language. 2009;111:20–35.
    1. Ohyama M, Senda M, Kitamura S, Ishii K, Mishina M, Terashi A. Role of the nondominant hemisphere and undamaged area during word repetition in poststroke aphasics: a PET activation study. Stroke. 1996;27(5):897–903.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する