Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes

Jon I Einarsson, Thomas T Vellinga, Andries R Twijnstra, Niraj R Chavan, Yoko Suzuki, James A Greenberg, Jon I Einarsson, Thomas T Vellinga, Andries R Twijnstra, Niraj R Chavan, Yoko Suzuki, James A Greenberg

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).

Methods: This was a case series of clinical outcomes following 172 consecutive LM and TLH cases over a 1-year period conducted at a university teaching hospital. It included 172 women (ages 17 to 81), requiring a myomectomy or hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids, pelvic pain, or abnormal uterine bleeding; 117 women underwent TLH and 55 women underwent LM. Patients were contacted over the phone 6 months after surgery to inquire about number of days of postoperative vaginal bleeding, visits to the hospital due to bleeding, dyspareunia, and other potential complications.

Results: For TLH, the average duration of surgery was 109 minutes, average uterine weight was 256 grams (range, 18 to 1242), and average blood loss was 71 mL. In LM, average duration of surgery was 125 minutes, average weight of fibroids was 252 g, average number of fibroids removed was 4.0, and average blood loss was 159 mL. Seven percent of patients and 8% of their partners had persistent dyspareunia after surgery. There were no conversions to laparotomy.

Conclusions: The use of bidirectional barbed suture appears to be safe for closing the vaginal cuff in a TLH and for closing the hysterotomy site during a laparoscopic myomectomy.

Conflict of interest statement

No Disclosures or conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Bidirectional barbed suture with barbs that change direction in the middle.

References

    1. 2004. [Accessed July 12, 2010]. .
    1. Leung JC. Barbed suture technology: Recent advances. Medical Textiles. 2004. October;26-27: 62–80
    1. Rashid RM, Sartori M, White LE, Villa MT, Yoo SS, Alam M. Breaking strength of barbed polypropylene sutures: rater-blinded, controlled comparison with nonbarbed sutures of various calibers. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:869–872
    1. Rodeheaver GT, Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, et al. Barbed sutures for wound closure: In vivo wound security, tissue compatibility and cosmesis measurements. Society for Biomaterials 30th Annual Meeting Transactions. 2004;229:232
    1. Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:621–623
    1. Moran ME, Marsh C, Perrotti M. Bidirectional-barbed sutured knotless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system. J Endourol. 2007;21:1175–1178
    1. Einarsson JI, Suzuki Y. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: 10 steps toward a successful procedure. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2:57–64
    1. Frishman G. Vasopressin: if some is good, is more better? Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:476–477
    1. Dietz UA, Kehl F, Hamelmann W, Weisser C. On the 100th anniversary of sterile catgut kuhn: Franz Kuhn (1866-1929) and the epistemology of catgut sterilization. World J Surg. 2007;31:2275–2283
    1. Laufman H, Rubel T. Synthetic absorbable sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977;145:597–608
    1. Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomized trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–154
    1. Kho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, Magtibay PM, Wechter ME, Magrina JF. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:231–235
    1. Hur HC, Guido RS, Mansuria SM, Hacker MR, Sanfilippo JS, Lee TT. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(3):311–317
    1. van Lankveld JJ, Granot M, Weijmar Schultz WC, et al. Women's sexual pain disorders. J Sex Med. 2010. January;7(1 Pt 2):615–631
    1. Chu CC, von Fraunhofer JA, Greisler HP. Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices. CRC Press, Danvers, MA USA;1997:61

Source: PubMed

3
購読する