Phase II study of mTORC1 inhibition by everolimus in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients with growing vestibular schwannomas

Stéphane Goutagny, Eric Raymond, Marina Esposito-Farese, Stéphanie Trunet, Christian Mawrin, Daniele Bernardeschi, Béatrice Larroque, Olivier Sterkers, Marco Giovannini, Michel Kalamarides, Stéphane Goutagny, Eric Raymond, Marina Esposito-Farese, Stéphanie Trunet, Christian Mawrin, Daniele Bernardeschi, Béatrice Larroque, Olivier Sterkers, Marco Giovannini, Michel Kalamarides

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a genetic disorder with bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) as the most frequent manifestation. Merlin, the NF2 tumor suppressor, was identified as a negative regulator of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. Pre-clinical data in mice showed that mTORC1 inhibition delayed growth of NF2-schwannomas. We conducted a prospective single-institution open-label phase II study to evaluate the effects of everolimus in ten NF2 patients with progressive VS. Drug activity was monitored every 3 months. Everolimus was administered orally for 12 months and, if the decrease in tumor volume was >20 % from baseline, treatment was continued for 12 additional months. Other patients stopped when completed 12 months of everolimus but were allowed to resume treatment when VS volume was >20 % during 1 year follow-up. Nine patients were evaluable. Safety was evaluated using CTCAE 3.0 criteria. After 12 months of everolimus, no reduction in volume ≥20 % was observed. Four patients had progressive disease, and five patients had stable disease with a median annual growth rate decreasing from 67 %/year before treatment to 0.5 %/year during treatment. In these patients, tumor growth resumed within 3-6 months after treatment discontinuation. Everolimus was then reintroduced and VS decreased by a median 6.8 % at 24 months. Time to tumor progression increased threefold from 4.2 months before treatment to > 12 months. Hearing was stable under treatment. The safety of everolimus was manageable. Although the primary endpoint was not reached, further studies are required to confirm the potential for stabilization of everolimus.

References

    1. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 1;11(11):4074-82
    1. Stat Med. 2001 Mar 30;20(6):859-66
    1. Neurology. 2013 Nov 19;81(21 Suppl 1):S33-40
    1. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59941
    1. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Sep;113(3):179-80
    1. Lancet. 2009 Jun 6;373(9679):1974-86
    1. Neuro Oncol. 2014 May;16(5):707-18
    1. Neurosurgery. 2013 Jun;72(6):907-13; discussion 914; quiz 914
    1. Neurosurgery. 2014 Mar;74(3):292-300; discussion 300-1
    1. Ann Oncol. 2011 Apr;22(4):990-1
    1. Neurosurgery. 2007 Mar;60(3):460-8; discussion 468-70
    1. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Feb;152A(2):327-32
    1. Lancet. 2013 Jan 12;381(9861):125-32
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;73(6):1197-204
    1. Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Aug;29(15):4250-61
    1. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1135-43
    1. J Neurosurg. 2012 Jul;117(1):109-17
    1. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 1;19(5):1180-9
    1. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):358-67
    1. Ann Oncol. 2010 Nov;21(11):2294-5
    1. Neuro Oncol. 2012 Sep;14(9):1163-70
    1. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Aug;33(6):1046-52
    1. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Apr;16(4):493-504
    1. Mol Cancer Res. 2012 May;10(5):649-59
    1. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(2):292-7
    1. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jan;35(1):e50-6
    1. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):140-51

Source: PubMed

3
購読する