Withdrawal of pharmacological treatment for heart failure in patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (TRED-HF): an open-label, pilot, randomised trial

Brian P Halliday, Rebecca Wassall, Amrit S Lota, Zohya Khalique, John Gregson, Simon Newsome, Robert Jackson, Tsveta Rahneva, Rick Wage, Gillian Smith, Lucia Venneri, Upasana Tayal, Dominique Auger, William Midwinter, Nicola Whiffin, Ronak Rajani, Jason N Dungu, Antonis Pantazis, Stuart A Cook, James S Ware, A John Baksi, Dudley J Pennell, Stuart D Rosen, Martin R Cowie, John G F Cleland, Sanjay K Prasad, Brian P Halliday, Rebecca Wassall, Amrit S Lota, Zohya Khalique, John Gregson, Simon Newsome, Robert Jackson, Tsveta Rahneva, Rick Wage, Gillian Smith, Lucia Venneri, Upasana Tayal, Dominique Auger, William Midwinter, Nicola Whiffin, Ronak Rajani, Jason N Dungu, Antonis Pantazis, Stuart A Cook, James S Ware, A John Baksi, Dudley J Pennell, Stuart D Rosen, Martin R Cowie, John G F Cleland, Sanjay K Prasad

Abstract

Background: Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy whose symptoms and cardiac function have recovered often ask whether their medications can be stopped. The safety of withdrawing treatment in this situation is unknown.

Methods: We did an open-label, pilot, randomised trial to examine the effect of phased withdrawal of heart failure medications in patients with previous dilated cardiomyopathy who were now asymptomatic, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved from less than 40% to 50% or greater, whose left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) had normalised, and who had an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) concentration less than 250 ng/L. Patients were recruited from a network of hospitals in the UK, assessed at one centre (Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), and randomly assigned (1:1) to phased withdrawal or continuation of treatment. After 6 months, patients in the continued treatment group had treatment withdrawn by the same method. The primary endpoint was a relapse of dilated cardiomyopathy within 6 months, defined by a reduction in LVEF of more than 10% and to less than 50%, an increase in LVEDV by more than 10% and to higher than the normal range, a two-fold rise in NT-pro-BNP concentration and to more than 400 ng/L, or clinical evidence of heart failure, at which point treatments were re-established. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02859311.

Findings: Between April 21, 2016, and Aug 22, 2017, 51 patients were enrolled. 25 were randomly assigned to the treatment withdrawal group and 26 to continue treatment. Over the first 6 months, 11 (44%) patients randomly assigned to treatment withdrawal met the primary endpoint of relapse compared with none of those assigned to continue treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 45·7% [95% CI 28·5-67·2]; p=0·0001). After 6 months, 25 (96%) of 26 patients assigned initially to continue treatment attempted its withdrawal. During the following 6 months, nine patients met the primary endpoint of relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 36·0% [95% CI 20·6-57·8]). No deaths were reported in either group and three serious adverse events were reported in the treatment withdrawal group: hospital admissions for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure.

Interpretation: Many patients deemed to have recovered from dilated cardiomyopathy will relapse following treatment withdrawal. Until robust predictors of relapse are defined, treatment should continue indefinitely.

Funding: British Heart Foundation, Alexander Jansons Foundation, Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of TRED-HF study design ACE=angiotensin converting enzyme. ARB=angiotensin receptor blocker. CMR=cardiovascular magnetic resonance. CPET=cardiopulmonary exercise test. KCCQ=Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. MRA=mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. NT-pro-BNP=N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. SAQ=symptom assessment questionnaire.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial profile One patient in the treatment withdrawal group who withdrew from the study was excluded from secondary analyses (table 3, table 4) because of absence of follow-up data. Therefore, 50 patients completed follow-up in the randomised phase. 49 patients completed follow-up after starting treatment withdrawal in the randomised and crossover phases (one patient did not cross over from the continued treatment group to begin treatment withdrawal). AF=atrial fibrillation. CPET=cardiopulmonary exercise test. DCM=dilated cardiomyopathy. ITT=intention-to-treat. LVEDVi=left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area. LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction. NSVT=non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. NT-pro-BNP=N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. PICs=participant identification centres.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curve of time to primary endpoint in randomised phase, according to treatment group One patient dropped out at 7 days.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Venn diagram showing components contributing to primary endpoint definition Numbers of patients with each combination of endpoints included. LVEDVi=left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area. LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction. NT-pro-BNP=N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. *Refers to one patient who developed peripheral oedema.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change in secondary endpoint variables between baseline and follow-up in the randomised phase of the study, based on treatment group Each circle represents one patient. bpm=beats per min. DCM=dilated cardiomyopathy. LVEDVi=left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area. LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction. NT-pro-BNP=N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.

References

    1. Tayal U, Newsome S, Buchan R. Phenotype and clinical outcomes of titin cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2264–2274.
    1. Merlo M, Pyxaras SA, Pinamonti B, Barbati G, Di Lenarda A, Sinagra G. Prevalence and prognostic significance of left ventricular reverse remodeling in dilated cardiomyopathy receiving tailored medical treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1468–1476.
    1. Basuray A, French B, Ky B. Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: clinical description, biomarkers, and outcomes. Circulation. 2014;129:2380–2387.
    1. Punnoose LR, Givertz MM, Lewis EF, Pratibhu P, Stevenson LW, Desai AS. Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: a distinct clinical entity. J Card Fail. 2011;17:527–532.
    1. Merlo M, Stolfo D, Anzini M. Persistent recovery of normal left ventricular function and dimension in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy during long-term follow-up: does real healing exist? J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e001504.
    1. Florea VG, Rector TS, Anand IS, Cohn JN. Heart failure with improved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics, correlates of recovery, and survival: results from the valsartan heart failure trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9:1–6.
    1. Mann DL, Barger PM, Burkhoff D. Myocardial recovery and the failing heart: myth, magic, or molecular target? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2465–2472.
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–2200.
    1. Richardson P, McKenna W, Bristow M. Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of cardiomyopathies. Circulation. 1996;93:841–842.
    1. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8:417–426.
    1. Myers J, Do D, Herbert W, Ribisl P, Froelicher VF. A nomogram to predict exercise capacity from a specific activity questionnaire and clinical data. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:591–596.
    1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424.
    1. Walsh R, Thomson KL, Ware JS. Reassessment of Mendelian gene pathogenicity using 7,855 cardiomyopathy cases and 60,706 reference samples. Genet Med. 2017;19:192–203.
    1. Whiffin N, Minikel E, Walsh R. Using high-resolution variant frequencies to empower clinical genome interpretation. Genet Med. 2017;19:1151–1158.
    1. Roberts AM, Ware JS, Herman DS. Integrated allelic, transcriptional, and phenomic dissection of the cardiac effects of titin truncations in health and disease. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:270ra6.
    1. Bellenger NG, Davies LC, Francis JM, Coats AJS, Pennell DJ. Reduction in sample size for studies of remodelling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2002;2:271–278.
    1. Waagstein F, Caidahl K, Wallentin I, Bergh CH, Hjalmarson A. Long-term beta-blockade in dilated cardiomyopathy. Effects of short- and long-term metoprolol treatment followed by withdrawal and readministration of metoprolol. Circulation. 1989;80:551–563.
    1. Swedberg K, Hjalmarson A, Waagstein F, Wallentin I. Adverse effects of beta-blockade withdrawal in patients with congestive cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J. 1980;44:134–142.
    1. Morimoto S, Shimizu K, Yamada K, Hiramitsu S, Hishida H. Can beta-blocker therapy be withdrawn from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy? Am Heart J. 1999;138:456–459.
    1. Pflugfelder PW, Baird MG, Tonkon MJ, DiBianco R, Pitt B. Clinical consequences of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor withdrawal in chronic heart failure: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quinapril. The Quinapril Heart Failure Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1557–1563.
    1. Moon J, Ko YG, Chung N. Recovery and recurrence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Can J Cardiol. 2009;25:e147–e150.
    1. Amos AM, Jaber WA, Russell SD. Improved outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy with contemporary. Am Heart J. 2006;152:509–513.
    1. Ware JS, Li J, Mazaika E. Shared genetic predisposition in peripartum and dilated cardiomyopathies. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:233–241.
    1. Ware JS, Amor-Salamanca A, Tayal U. Genetic etiology for alcohol-induced cardiac toxicity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2293–2302.
    1. Felker GM, Thompson RE, Hare JM. Underlying causes and long-term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1077–1084.
    1. Felkin LE, Walsh R, Ware JS. Recovery of cardiac function in cardiomyopathy caused by titin truncation. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:234–235.
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–2200.
    1. Bohm M, Swedberg K, Komajda M. Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:886–894.
    1. Cleland JGF, Bunting KV, Flather MD. Beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: an individual patient-level analysis of double-blind randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2017;39:26–35.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する