Early Detection and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Reduce Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: A Simulation of the Results of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People With Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Europe)

William H Herman, Wen Ye, Simon J Griffin, Rebecca K Simmons, Melanie J Davies, Kamlesh Khunti, Guy E H M Rutten, Annelli Sandbaek, Torsten Lauritzen, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Morton B Brown, Nicholas J Wareham, William H Herman, Wen Ye, Simon J Griffin, Rebecca K Simmons, Melanie J Davies, Kamlesh Khunti, Guy E H M Rutten, Annelli Sandbaek, Torsten Lauritzen, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Morton B Brown, Nicholas J Wareham

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the benefits of screening and early treatment of type 2 diabetes compared with no screening and late treatment using a simulation model with data from the ADDITION-Europe study.

Research design and methods: We used the Michigan Model, a validated computer simulation model, and data from the ADDITION-Europe study to estimate the absolute risk of cardiovascular outcomes and the relative risk reduction associated with screening and intensive treatment, screening and routine treatment, and no screening with a 3- or 6-year delay in the diagnosis and routine treatment of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors.

Results: When the computer simulation model was programmed with the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the ADDITION-Europe population, it accurately predicted the empiric results of the trial. The simulated absolute risk reduction and relative risk reduction were substantially greater at 5 years with screening, early diagnosis, and routine treatment compared with scenarios in which there was a 3-year (3.3% absolute risk reduction [ARR], 29% relative risk reduction [RRR]) or a 6-year (4.9% ARR, 38% RRR) delay in diagnosis and routine treatment of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors.

Conclusions: Major benefits are likely to accrue from the early diagnosis and treatment of glycemia and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes. The intensity of glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol treatment after diagnosis is less important than the time of its initiation. Screening for type 2 diabetes to reduce the lead time between diabetes onset and clinical diagnosis and to allow for prompt multifactorial treatment is warranted.

© 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulated incidence of the composite cardiovascular outcome by treatment group with and without delays in diagnosis and treatment in the ADDITION-Europe trial. *Outcome defined as stroke, MI, revascularization, amputation, or cardiovascular death. The error bars indicate SDs calculated from 100 simulations.

References

    1. Engelgau MM, Narayan KM, Herman WH. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1563–1580
    1. Gillies CL, Lambert PC, Abrams KR, et al. . Different strategies for screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2008;336:1180–1185
    1. Kahn R, Alperin P, Eddy D, et al. . Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2010;375:1365–1374
    1. Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ, et al. . Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2011;378:156–167
    1. Lauritzen T, Griffin S, Borch-Johnsen K, Wareham NJ, Wolffenbuttel BH, Rutten G; Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen Detected Diabetes in Primary Care . The ADDITION study: proposed trial of the cost-effectiveness of an intensive multifactorial intervention on morbidity and mortality among people with Type 2 diabetes detected by screening. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24(Suppl. 3):S6–S11
    1. Sandbaek A, Griffin SJ, Rutten G, et al. . Stepwise screening for diabetes identifies people with high but modifiable coronary heart disease risk. The ADDITION study. Diabetologia 2008;51:1127–1134
    1. Eborall HC, Griffin SJ, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, French DP, Sutton S. Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007;335:486.
    1. Paddison CAM, Eborall HC, Sutton S, et al. . Are people with negative diabetes screening tests falsely reassured? Parallel group cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;339:b4535.
    1. Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, et al. .; UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKDPS) Group . A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia 2004;47:1747–1759
    1. Rahman M, Simmons RK, Hennings SH, Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ. How much does screening bring forward the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and reduce complications? Twelve year follow-up of the Ely cohort. Diabetologia 2012;55:1651–1659
    1. Harris MI, Klein R, Welborn TA, Knuiman MW. Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4-7 yr before clinical diagnosis. Diabetes Care 1992;15:815–819
    1. Porta M, Curletto G, Cipullo D, et al. . Estimating the delay between onset and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes from the time course of retinopathy prevalence. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1668–1674
    1. Thompson TJ, Engelgau MM, Hegazy M, et al. . The onset of NIDDM and its relationship to clinical diagnosis in Egyptian adults. Diabet Med 1996;13:337–340
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Draft recommendation statement. Abnormal glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: screening [Internet]. Available from . Accessed 26 February 2015

Source: PubMed

3
購読する