A Comparative Study between Indigenous Low Cost Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Added Local Oxygen versus Conventional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

A Singh, K Panda, J Mishra, A Dash, A Singh, K Panda, J Mishra, A Dash

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of compound fractures and severe soft tissue loss has increased manifolds due to high speed traffics. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is a treatment modality for managing soft tissue aspect of such injuries. It reduces the need of flap coverage. However, many patients from developing countries cannot afford a conventional NPWT. We developed an indigenous low cost NPWT for our patients and supplemented it with Topical Pressurised Oxygen Therapy (TPOT). We conducted this study to compare its treatment outcome with the use of conventional NPWT.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted from 2018 to 2020 at a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 86 patients were treated with NPWT and their results were assessed for various parameters like reduction in wound size, discharge, infection, etc. We included patients with acute traumatic wounds as well as chronic infected wounds, and placed them in three treatment groups to receive either conventional NPWT, Indigenous NPWT and lastly NPWT with supplement TPOT.

Results: We observed a significant reduction of wound size, discharge and infection control in all three groups. The efficacy of indigenous NPWT is at par with conventional NPWT. Only six patients who had several comorbidities required flap coverage while in another four patients we could not achieve desired result due to technical limitations.

Conclusion: Indigenous NPWT with added TPOT is a very potent and cost effective method to control infection and rapid management of severe trauma seen in orthopaedic practice. It also decreases the dependency on plastic surgeons for management of such wounds.

Keywords: NPWT; VAC; compound fracture; negative pressure wound therapy; vacuum assisted closure.

© 2020 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Randomised controlled study design and fate of all three treatment arms
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
Steps of application of Indigenous NPWT. (a) Sharp debridement. (b) Measurement and trimming of foam. (c) Placement of foam and Infant feeding tube. (d) Airtight sealing with a piece of IOBAN (3M). (e) Before negative pressure application. (f) Wrinkling and shrinkage after negative pressure application. (NPWT : Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. IOBAN : Iodine impregnated Antimicrobial Incise Drape by 3M).
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:
(a,b,c,d) A patient of Morel – Lavallee Lesion at lateral aspect of thigh treated with Indigenous NPWT (3 cycles- 14 days) and healed with secondary intention.
Fig. 4:
Fig. 4:
Patient with wound over dorsal aspect of right foot and external fixator applied to span the ankle joint and immobilisation, a) after 1 cycle of indigenous NPWT+TPOT. (b) Wound after two cycles of Indigenous NPWT+TPOT. (c) Post STSG application.

References

    1. Bobkiewicz A, Banasiewicz T, Ledwosinski W, Drews M. Medical terminology associated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). Under-standing and Misunderstanding in the field of NPWT. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. 2014;2(1):69–73.
    1. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt WBS. Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(6):553–62.
    1. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(6):563–77.
    1. Morykwas MJ, Simpson J, Punger K, Argenta A, Kremers L, Argenta J. Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation. Plat Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):121S–6S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000225450.12593.12.
    1. Kairinos N, Solomons M, Hudson DA. The paradox of negative pressure wound therapy--in vitro studies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(1):174–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.08.037.
    1. Erba P, Ogawa R, Ackermann M, Adini A, Miele LF, Dastouri P et al. Angiogenesis in wounds treated by microdeformational wound therapy. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):402–9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820563a8.
    1. Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(2):257–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09804..
    1. Sen CK. Wound healing essentials: Let there be oxygen. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(1):1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00436.x.
    1. Cockbill S. Wounds: The healing process. Hosp Pharmacist. 2002;9:255–60.
    1. Robins SP. Biochemistry and functional significance of collagen cross-linking. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35(5):849–52. doi: 10.1042/BST0350849.
    1. Johnstone CC, Farley A. The physiological basics of wound healing. Nurs Stand. 2005;19(43):59–65. doi: 10.7748/ns2005.07.19.43.59.c3906.
    1. Stucker M, Struk A, Altmeyer P, Herde M, Baumgartl H, Lubbers DW. The cutaneous uptake of atmospheric oxygen contributes significantly to the oxygen supply of human dermis and epidermis. J Physiol. 2002;538(3):985–94. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013067.
    1. Blackman E, Moore C, Hyatt J, Railton R, Frye C. Topical wound oxygen therapy in the treatment of severe diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective controlled study. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2010;56(6):24–31.
    1. Gordillo GM, Roy S, Khanna S, Schlanger R, Khandelwal S, Phillips G et al. Topical oxygen therapy induces vascular endothelial growth factor expression and improves closure of clinically presented chronic wounds. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35(8):957–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04934.x.
    1. Gordillo GM, Sen CK. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of topical oxygen therapy in the treatment of lower extremity wounds. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2009;8(2):105–11. doi: 10.1177/1534734609335149.
    1. Birke-Sorensen H, Malmsjo M, Rome P, Hudson D, Krug E, Berg L et al. Evidence-based recommendations for negative pressure wound therapy: treatment variables (pressure levels, wound filler and contact layer) - Steps towards an international consensus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(Suppl):S1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.06.001.
    1. Borgquist O, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M. Wound edge microvascular blood flow during negative-pressure wound therapy: examining the effects of pressures from -10 to -175mmHg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):502–9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82e1f.
    1. Stannard JP, Volgas DA, Stewart R, McGwin G Jr, Alonso JE. Negative pressure wound therapy after severe open fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(8):552–7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a2e2b6.
    1. Lee HJ, Kim JW, Oh CW, Min WK, Shon OJ, Oh JK et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for soft tissue injuries around the foot and ankle. J Orthop Surg Res. 2009;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-4-14.
    1. Sinha K, Chauhan VD, Maheshwari R, Chauhan N, Rajan M, Agrawal A. Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy versus Standard Wound Therapy for Open Musculoskeletal Injuries. Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:245940. doi: 10.1155/2013/245940.
    1. Tromans D. Temperature and pressure dependent solubility of oxygen in water: A thermodynamic analysis. Hydrometallurgy. 1998;48(3):327–42. doi: 10.1016/S0304-386X(98)00007-3.
    1. Tawfick WA, Sultan S. Technical and clinical outcome of topical wound oxygen in comparison to conventional compression dressings in the management of refractory nonhealing venous ulcers. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013;47(1):30–7. doi: 10.1177/1538574412467684..
    1. Dissemond J, Kroger K, Storck M, Risse A, Engels P. Topical oxygen wound therapies for chronic wounds: A review. J Wound Care. 2015;24(2):53–63. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.53.
    1. Eginton MT, Kellie RB, Seabrook GR, Towne JB, Cambria RA. A prospective randomized evaluation of negative-pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17(6):645–9. doi: 10.1007/s10016-003-0065-3.
    1. Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H. Negative-pressure dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers. J Dermatol. 2014;30(4):299–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2003.tb00391.x.
    1. Herscovici D Jr, Sanders RW, Scaduto JM, Infante A, DiPasquale T. Vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC Therapy) for the management of patients with high-energy soft tissue injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(10):683–8. doi: 10.1097/00005131200311000-00004.
    1. Anagnostakos K, Schmitt C. Can periprosthetic hip joint infections be successfully managed by debridement and prosthesis retention? World J Orthop. 2014;5(3):218–24. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.218.
    1. Rispoli DM, Horne BR, Kryzak TJ, Richardson MW. Description of a technique for vacuum-assisted deep drains in the management of cavitary defects and deep infections in devastating military and civilian trauma. J Trauma. 2010;68(5):124752. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d3cc3c.
    1. Lessing MC, James RB, Ingram SC. Comparison of the effects of different negative pressure wound therapy modes-continuous, noncontinuous, and with instillation-on porcine excisional wounds. Eplasty. 2013;13:e51.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する