Impact of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on urinary supersaturations in kidney stone formers (SWEETSTONE trial): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial

Simeon Schietzel, Lia Bally, Grazia Cereghetti, Nicolas Faller, Matthias B Moor, Bruno Vogt, Felix Rintelen, S Trelle, Daniel Fuster, Simeon Schietzel, Lia Bally, Grazia Cereghetti, Nicolas Faller, Matthias B Moor, Bruno Vogt, Felix Rintelen, S Trelle, Daniel Fuster

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney stones are a global healthcare problem. Given high recurrence rates and the morbidity associated with symptomatic stone disease, effective medical prophylaxis is clearly an unmet need. Explanatory analyses of randomised controlled trials with sodium/glucose cotransporter isoform 2 inhibitors indicated a 30%-50% reduced rate of stone events in patients with diabetes. Underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We aim to determine the effect of empagliflozin on urinary supersaturations in non-diabetic kidney stone formers to evaluate their therapeutic potential for recurrence prevention. We will provide first clinical trial evidence on whether urinary supersaturations are affected by empagliflozin in kidney stone formers.

Methods and analysis: The SWEETSTONE trial is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, exploratory study to assess the impact of empagliflozin on urinary supersaturations of calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate and uric acid in kidney stone formers. We plan to include 46 non-diabetic adults (18-74 years) with ≥1 past kidney stone event and stone composition with ≥80% of calcium or ≥80% of uric acid. Patients with secondary causes of kidney stones or chronic kidney disease will be excluded. Eligible individuals will be randomised in equal proportions to receive either a 14-day treatment with 25 mg empagliflozin followed after the 2-6 weeks wash out period by a 14-day treatment with a matching placebo or the reverse procedure. Secondary outcomes will include electrolyte concentrations, renal function, mineral metabolism and glycaemic parameters, urinary volume and safety.Results will be presented as effect measures (95% CIs) with p values and hypothesis testing for primary outcomes (significance level 0.02).

Ethics and dissemination: The SWEETSTONE trial was approved by the Swiss ethics committee and Swissmedic. First results are expected in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Trial registration number: NCT04911660; Pre-results.

Keywords: clinical pharmacology; clinical trials; nephrology; urolithiasis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The SWEETSTONE trial is partially supported by Boehringer Ingelheim, Basel, Switzerland, who provided the IMP and granted SFr75000 supporting laboratory analyses. Boehringer Ingelheim will have the right to comment on any manuscript derived from this study but will have no right to interfere in the process of publishing results in any form deemed appropriate by the investigators.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SWEETSTONE study design.

References

    1. Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, et al. . Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012;62:160–5. 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
    1. Yoshida O, Okada Y. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Japan: a chronological and geographical study. Urol Int 1990;45:104–11. 10.1159/000281680
    1. Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, et al. . Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 2003;44:709–13. 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00415-9
    1. Worcester EM, Coe FL. Clinical practice. calcium kidney stones. N Engl J Med 2010;363:954–63. 10.1056/NEJMcp1001011
    1. Uribarri J, Oh MS, Carroll HJ. The first kidney stone. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:1006–9. 10.7326/0003-4819-111-12-1006
    1. Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR, et al. . Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 2005;68:1808–14. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x
    1. Parks JH, Coward M, Coe FL. Correspondence between stone composition and urine supersaturation in nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 1997;51:894–900. 10.1038/ki.1997.126
    1. Cheungpasitporn W, Rossetti S, Friend K, et al. . Treatment effect, adherence, and safety of high fluid intake for the prevention of incident and recurrent kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol 2016;29:211–9. 10.1007/s40620-015-0210-4
    1. Borghi L, Meschi T, Amato F, et al. . Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study. J Urol 1996;155:839–43. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66321-3
    1. Ferraro PM, Ticinesi A, Meschi T, et al. . Short-Term changes in urinary relative supersaturation predict recurrence of kidney stones: a tool to guide preventive measures in urolithiasis. J Urol 2018;200:1082–7. 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.029
    1. Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, et al. . Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 2002;346:77–84. 10.1056/NEJMoa010369
    1. Madore F, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, et al. . Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension in women. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32:802–7. 10.1016/S0272-6386(98)70136-2
    1. Madore F, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, et al. . Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1998;11:46–53. 10.1016/S0895-7061(97)00371-3
    1. Taylor EN, Curhan GC. Body size and 24-hour urine composition. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48:905–15. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.09.004
    1. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 2005;293:455–62. 10.1001/jama.293.4.455
    1. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 2005;68:1230–5. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00516.x
    1. Meydan N, Barutca S, Caliskan S, et al. . Urinary stone disease in diabetes mellitus. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003;37:64–70. 10.1080/00365590310008730
    1. Liu Y, Li S, Zeng Z, et al. . Kidney stones and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64:402–10. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.03.017
    1. Alexander RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Wiebe N, et al. . Kidney stones and kidney function loss: a cohort study. BMJ 2012;345:e5287. 10.1136/bmj.e5287
    1. Sakhaee K, Maalouf NM, Kumar R, et al. . Nephrolithiasis-associated bone disease: pathogenesis and treatment options. Kidney Int 2011;79:393–403. 10.1038/ki.2010.473
    1. Maalouf NM, Sakhaee K, Parks JH, et al. . Association of urinary pH with body weight in nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 2004;65:1422–5. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00522.x
    1. Kanai Y, Lee WS, You G, et al. . The human kidney low affinity Na+/glucose cotransporter SGLT2. Delineation of the major renal reabsorptive mechanism for D-glucose. J Clin Invest 1994;93:397–404. 10.1172/JCI116972
    1. Refardt J, Winzeler B, Meienberg F, et al. . Empagliflozin increases short-term urinary volume output in artificially induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. Int J Endocrinol 2017;2017:1–8. 10.1155/2017/7815690
    1. Seman L, Macha S, Nehmiz G, et al. . Empagliflozin (BI 10773), a potent and selective SGLT2 inhibitor, induces dose-dependent glucosuria in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2013;2:152–61. 10.1002/cpdd.16
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. . Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2117–28. 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720
    1. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. . Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016;375:323–34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1515920
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. . Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017;377:644–57. 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925
    1. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. . Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2019;380:347–57. 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389
    1. Kohler S, Zeller C, Iliev H, et al. . Safety and tolerability of Empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of phase I-III clinical trials. Adv Ther 2017;34:1707–26. 10.1007/s12325-017-0573-0
    1. Kohler S, Salsali A, Hantel S, et al. . Safety and tolerability of Empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther 2016;38:1299–313. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.031
    1. Rule AD, Lieske JC, Li X, et al. . The ROKS nomogram for predicting a second symptomatic stone episode. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;25:2878–86. 10.1681/ASN.2013091011
    1. Vaughan LE, Enders FT, Lieske JC, et al. . Predictors of symptomatic kidney stone recurrence after the first and subsequent episodes. Mayo Clin Proc 2019;94:202–10. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.016
    1. Fink HA, Wilt TJ, Eidman KE, et al. . Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a systematic review for an American College of physicians clinical guideline. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:535–43. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00005
    1. Dhayat NA, Faller N, Bonny O, et al. . Efficacy of standard and low dose hydrochlorothiazide in the recurrence prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis (NOSTONE trial): protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. BMC Nephrol 2018;19:349. 10.1186/s12882-018-1144-6
    1. Singh M, Kumar A. Risks associated with SGLT2 inhibitors: an overview. Curr Drug Saf 2018;13:84–91. 10.2174/1574886313666180226103408
    1. Kohan DE, Fioretto P, Tang W, et al. . Long-Term study of patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment shows that dapagliflozin reduces weight and blood pressure but does not improve glycemic control. Kidney Int 2014;85:962–71. 10.1038/ki.2013.356
    1. Taylor SI, Blau JE, Rother KI. Possible adverse effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:8–10. 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70227-X
    1. Blau JE, Bauman V, Conway EM, et al. . Canagliflozin triggers the FGF23/1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D/PTH axis in healthy volunteers in a randomized crossover study. JCI Insight 2018;3. 10.1172/jci.insight.99123. [Epub ahead of print: 19 04 2018].
    1. Kohler S, Kaspers S, Salsali A, et al. . Analysis of fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with Empagliflozin in pooled data from placebo-controlled trials and a head-to-head study versus glimepiride. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1809–16. 10.2337/dc17-1525
    1. Guideline ICHHT . Clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting E2A. In: International Conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use, 1994.
    1. Williams JC, Gambaro G, Rodgers A, et al. . Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference. Urolithiasis 2021;49:1-16. 10.1007/s00240-020-01217-3
    1. Basiri A, Taheri M, Taheri F. What is the state of the stone analysis techniques in urolithiasis? Urol J 2012;9:445–54.
    1. Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, et al. . Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol 2014;192:316–24. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006
    1. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, European Association of U . EUA guidelines on urolithiasis 2014.
    1. EudraLex TRGMPitEU . Volume 4, EU Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practice, Medicinal Products for Human and Veterinary Use, Annex 13 - Investigational Medicinal Products, Brussels, 2010.
    1. Pak CYC, Sakhaee K, Moe O, et al. . Biochemical profile of stone-forming patients with diabetes mellitus. Urology 2003;61:523–7. 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02421-4
    1. Vickerstaff V, Omar RZ, Ambler G. Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019;19:129. 10.1186/s12874-019-0754-4
    1. Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, et al. . Consort 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4378. 10.1136/bmj.l4378
    1. Freeman PR. The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials. Stat Med 1989;8:1421–32. 10.1002/sim.4780081202

Source: PubMed

3
購読する