A contemporary risk model for predicting 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in England and Wales

Katherine S L McAllister, Peter F Ludman, William Hulme, Mark A de Belder, Rodney Stables, Saqib Chowdhary, Mamas A Mamas, Matthew Sperrin, Iain E Buchan, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Katherine S L McAllister, Peter F Ludman, William Hulme, Mark A de Belder, Rodney Stables, Saqib Chowdhary, Mamas A Mamas, Matthew Sperrin, Iain E Buchan, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research

Abstract

Background: The current risk model for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the UK is based on outcomes of patients treated in a different era of interventional cardiology. This study aimed to create a new model, based on a contemporary cohort of PCI treated patients, which would: predict 30 day mortality; provide good discrimination; and be well calibrated across a broad risk-spectrum.

Methods and results: The model was derived from a training dataset of 336,433 PCI cases carried out between 2007 and 2011 in England and Wales, with 30 day mortality provided by record linkage. Candidate variables were selected on the basis of clinical consensus and data quality. Procedures in 2012 were used to perform temporal validation of the model. The strongest predictors of 30-day mortality were: cardiogenic shock; dialysis; and the indication for PCI and the degree of urgency with which it was performed. The model had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.85 on the training data and 0.86 on validation. Calibration plots indicated a good model fit on development which was maintained on validation.

Conclusion: We have created a contemporary model for PCI that encompasses a range of clinical risk, from stable elective PCI to emergency primary PCI and cardiogenic shock. The model is easy to apply and based on data reported in national registries. It has a high degree of discrimination and is well calibrated across the risk spectrum. The examination of key outcomes in PCI audit can be improved with this risk-adjusted model.

Keywords: Angioplasty; Catheterization; Coronary disease; Prognosis; Risk factors.

Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart illustrating creation of analysis and validation dataset from the available records in the BCIS database.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustrations of model discrimination and calibration. (i) Receiver operating characteristic curve of model on development data (2007–2011), (ii) receiver operating characteristic curve of model when applied to validation data (2012), (iii) calibration plot 100 quantiles) for model in development, and (iv) calibration plot (100 quantiles) for model on validation.

References

    1. Department of Health . 2000. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease.
    1. National Health Service . 2013. 2013/14 NHS Standard Contract: Technical Contract Guidance.
    1. Ludman P. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2011;97:1293–1297.
    1. Rothman K.J., Greenland S., Lash T.L. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. Modern Epidemiology.
    1. Grayson A.D., Moore R.K., Jackson M., Rathore S., Sastry S., Gray T.P. Multivariate prediction of major adverse cardiac events after 9914 percutaneous coronary interventions in the north west of England. Heart. 2006;92:658–663.
    1. Mclenachan J.M., Gray H.H., De Belder M.A., Ludman P.F., Cunningham D., Birkhead J. Developing primary PCI as a national reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the UK experience. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:99–107.
    1. Ludman P.F. 2013. Audit of Adult Intervention in 2012.
    1. Brennan J.M., Curtis J.P., Dai D., Fitzgerald S., Khandelwal A.K., Spertus J.A. Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2013;6:790–799.
    1. Peberdy M.A., Donnino M.W., Callaway C.W., Dimaio J.M., Geocadin R.G., Ghaemmaghami C.A. Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention performance reporting on cardiac resuscitation centers: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:762–773.
    1. Hickey G.L., Grant S.W., Cosgriff R., Dimarakis I., Pagano D., Kappetein A.P. Clinical registries: governance, management, analysis and applications. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2013;44:605–614.
    1. Marcin J.P., Romano P.S. Size matters to a model's fit. Crit. Care Med. 2007;35:2212–2213.
    1. Chowdhary S., Ivanov J., Mackie K., Seidelin P.H., Dzavík V. The Toronto score for in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions. Am. Heart J. 2009;157:156–163.
    1. Moscucci M., Eagle K.A., Share D., Smith D., De Franco A.C., O'Donnell M. Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;45:1759–1765.
    1. McCabe J.M., Joynt K.E., Welt F.G.P., Resnic F.S. Impact of public reporting and outlier status identification on percutaneous coronary intervention case selection in Massachusetts. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2013;6:625–630.
    1. Joynt K.E., Blumenthal D.M., Orav E.J., Resnic F.S., Jha A.K. Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2012;308:1460–1468.
    1. Apolito R., Greenberg M., Menegus M., Lowe A.M., Sleeper L., Goldberger M.H. Impact of the New York state cardiac surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention reporting system on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Am. Heart J. 2008;155:267–273.
    1. Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain & Ireland . Soc. Cardiothorac. Surg. Gt. Britain Irel.; 2013. Blue Book Online. ( )
    1. Grant S.W., Hickey G.L., Dimarakis I., Cooper G., Jenkins D.P., Uppal R. Performance of the EuroSCORE models in emergency cardiac surgery. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2013;6:178–185.
    1. Van Hoorde K., Vergouwe Y., Timmerman D., Van Huffel S., Steyerberg E.W., Van Calster B. Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models. Stat. Med. 2014;33:2585–2596.
    1. Janssen K.J.M., Moons K.G.M., Kalkman C.J., Grobbee D.E., Vergouwe Y. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008;61:76–86.
    1. Department of Health . 2014. Protecting Health and Care Information: A Consultation on Proposals to Introduce New Regulations.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する