Identifying leaks in the STEM recruitment pipeline among sexual and gender minority US secondary students

Casey D Xavier Hall, Christine V Wood, Manuel Hurtado, David A Moskowitz, Christina Dyar, Brian Mustanski, Casey D Xavier Hall, Christine V Wood, Manuel Hurtado, David A Moskowitz, Christina Dyar, Brian Mustanski

Abstract

Purpose: Research establishes the critical need to address the underrepresentation of women and racial/ethnic minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). While emergent research addresses similar challenges for sexual and gender minorities (SGM), this research remains scant and focuses on adult experiences. This analysis examines subgroup differences and the impact of bullying on STEM engagement outcomes among a national sample of SGM secondary students in the U.S.

Method: This report provides descriptive and multivariable regression analysis of national survey data (n = 539) on the experiences of pre-college students who identify as SGM, including the effects of within-school anti-SGM bullying on STEM identity, perceptions of STEM climate, and STEM intentions.

Results: Roughly 50% of the sample intended to enter a STEM field (compared to 25% in previous general samples). Bullying in school was negatively associated with STEM identity and perceptions of STEM climate. Sense of belonging is positively associated with perceptions of STEM climate and STEM intentions. Being non-binary and being a transgender man were associated with decreased sense of belonging and negative perception of STEM climate.

Conclusion: This report is the first to identify factors influencing STEM engagement among SGM secondary students and suggests that issues of STEM engagement are already present in adolescence. Moreover, the findings also establish the relationship between anti-SGM bullying and STEM outcomes highlighting the importance of this marginalization experience. Future research should further examine sub-group differences and the persistence of these effects. These findings highlight the need for research and intervention addressing STEM outcomes in SGM populations.

Clinical trial registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03511131.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Womack VY, Wood CV, House SC, Quinn SC, Thomas SB, McGee R, et al.. Culturally aware mentorship: Lasting impacts of a novel intervention on academic administrators and faculty. PloS one. 2020;15(8):e0236983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236983
    1. Foundation NS. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Engineering and Science 2019. Available from: .
    1. Gillborn D. Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of education policy. 2005;20(4):485–505.
    1. Gibbs KD Jr, Griffin KA. What do I want to be with my PhD? The roles of personal values and structural dynamics in shaping the career interests of recent biomedical science PhD graduates. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2013;12(4):711–23. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-02-0021
    1. Lambert WM, Wells MT, Cipriano MF, Sneva JN, Morris JA, Golightly LM. Research Culture: career choices of underrepresented and female postdocs in the biomedical sciences. Elife. 2020;9:e48774. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48774
    1. Health NIo. Sexual and Gender Minorities Formally Designated as a Health Disparity Population for Research Purposes. 2016.
    1. Langin K. How many scientists are LGBTQ? Federal survey delays frustrate researchers: Scientists call for National Science Foundation’s workforce surveys to tally sexual and gender minorities. ScienceInsider. 2020.
    1. Caldwell L, Garcia R, Cagle N. K-12 diversity pathway programs in the E-STEM fields: A review of existing programs and summary of unmet needs. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. 2018;19(4).
    1. Farinde AA, Lewis CW. The underrepresentation of African American female students in STEM fields: Implications for classroom teachers. Online Submission. 2012.
    1. Valantine HA, Collins FS. National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(40):12240–2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515612112
    1. Alhaddab TA, Alnatheer SA, editors. Future scientists: How women’s and minorities’ math self-efficacy and science perception affect their STEM major selection. 2015 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference; 2015: IEEE.
    1. Hinojosa T, Rapaport A, Jaciw A, Zacamy J. Exploring the Foundations of the Future STEM Workforce: K-12 Indicators of Postsecondary STEM Success. REL 2016–122. Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. 2016.
    1. Estrada M, Woodcock A, Hernandez PR, Schultz P. Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. Journal of educational psychology. 2011;103(1):206. doi: 10.1037/a0020743
    1. Cobian K. A Comparison of Intended Biomedical Majors Across Sexual and Gender Identity: A First Look from Freshmen at BUILD Sites. Fact Sheet. Los Angeles, CA: Diversity Program Consortium (DPC) Coordination and Evaluation Center at UCLA; 2020.
    1. Conron KJ, Goldberg SK. Adult LGBT population in the United States. 2019.
    1. Gallup I. LGBT Identification in US Ticks Up to 7.1%. Retrieved 18 February 2022. 2022.
    1. Hughes BE. Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science advances. 2018;4(3):eaao6373. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6373
    1. Cech EA, Waidzunas TJ. Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies. 2011;3(1):1–24.
    1. Cech EA, Pham MV. Queer in STEM organizations: Workplace disadvantages for LGBT employees in STEM related federal agencies. Social Sciences. 2017;6(1):12.
    1. Health NIo. NIH Workplace Climate and Harassment Survey Summary Findings Report. 2020.
    1. Carlone HB, Johnson A. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 2007;44(8):1187–218.
    1. Trujillo G, Tanner KD. Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2014;13(1):6–15. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241
    1. Mongelli F, Perrone D, BaLDUcci J, Sacchetti A, Ferrari S, Mattei G, et al.. Minority stress and mental health among LGBT populations: An update on the evidence. 2019.
    1. Brooks VR. Minority stress and lesbian women: Free Press; 1981.
    1. Meyer IH. Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of health and social behavior. 1995:38–56.
    1. Hurtado S, Alvarez CL, Guillermo-Wann C, Cuellar M, Arellano L. A model for diverse learning environments. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research: Springer; 2012. p. 41–122.
    1. Cech E, Waidzunas T. Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM. Science advances. 2021;7(3):eabe0933. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933
    1. Moyano N, del Mar Sánchez-Fuentes M. Homophobic bullying at schools: A systematic review of research, prevalence, school-related predictors and consequences. Aggression and violent behavior. 2020;53:101441.
    1. Elipe P, de la Oliva Muñoz M, Del Rey R. Homophobic bullying and cyberbullying: Study of a silenced problem. Journal of homosexuality. 2018;65(5):672–86. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1333809
    1. Mustanski B, Moskowitz D, Moran K, Newcomb M, Macapagal K, Rodriguez-Diaz C, et al.. Evaluation of a stepped care eHealth HIV prevention program for diverse adolescent MSM: Protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial of SMART (Preprint). JMIR Research Protocols. 2020;9. doi: 10.2196/19701
    1. Mustanski B. Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: A call to action for a scientifically informed approach. Archives of sexual behavior. 2011;40(4):673–86. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9745-1
    1. Rankin S, Blumenfeld W, Weber G, Frazer S. State of higher education for LGBT people: Campus pride 2010 national college climate survey. Charlotte, NC: Campus Pride. 2010.
    1. Mendoza-Denton R, Downey G, Purdie VJ, Davis A, Pietrzak J. Sensitivity to status-based rejection: implications for African American students’ college experience. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2002;83(4):896. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.896
    1. Worthington RL, Navarro RL, Loewy M, Hart J. Color-blind racial attitudes, social dominance orientation, racial-ethnic group membership and college students’ perceptions of campus climate. Journal of Diversity in higher education. 2008;1(1):8.
    1. Reisner SL, Conron KJ, Baker K, Herman JL, Lombardi E, Greytak EA, et al.. “Counting” transgender and gender-nonconforming adults in health research: Recommendations from the gender identity in US surveillance group. Transgender Studies Quarterly. 2015;2(1):34–57.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1995;57(1):289–300. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91. Epub 2007/08/19. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146 .
    1. Sadler PM, Sonnert G, Hazari Z, Tai R. Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education. 2012;96(3):411–27. 10.1002/sce.21007.
    1. Education USDo. National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Fall 2016 Completions Component. Digest of Education Statistics 2017; 2017.
    1. Feinstein BA, Dyar C. Bisexuality, minority stress, and health. Current sexual health reports. 2017;9(1):42–9. doi: 10.1007/s11930-017-0096-3
    1. Miriti MN. The elephant in the room: race and STEM diversity. BioScience. 2020;70(3):237–42.
    1. Allen-Ramdial S-AA, Campbell AG. Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success. BioScience. 2014;64(7):612–8. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu076
    1. California Department of Education. Supporting LGBTQ+ Students. 2020.
    1. Hall W. The effectiveness of policy interventions for school bullying: A systematic review. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. 2017;8(1):45–69. doi: 10.1086/690565

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する