Fractal analysis of plaque border, a novel method for the quantification of atherosclerotic plaque contour irregularity, is associated with pro-atherogenic plasma lipid profile in subjects with non-obstructive carotid stenoses

Francesco Moroni, Marco Magnoni, Vittoria Vergani, Enrico Ammirati, Paolo G Camici, Francesco Moroni, Marco Magnoni, Vittoria Vergani, Enrico Ammirati, Paolo G Camici

Abstract

Background and aims: Plaque border irregularity is a known imaging characteristic of vulnerable plaques, but its evaluation heavily relies on subjective evaluation and operator expertise. Aim of the present work is to propose a novel fractal-analysis based method for the quantification of atherosclerotic plaque border irregularity and assess its relation with cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods and results: Forty-two asymptomatic subjects with carotid stenosis underwent ultrasound evaluation and assessment of cardiovascular risk factors. Total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) plasma cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations were measured for each subject. Fractal analysis was performed in all the carotid segments affected by atherosclerosis, i.e. 147 segments. The resulting fractal dimension (FD) is a measure of irregularity of plaque profile on long axis view of the plaque. FD in the severest stenosis (main plaque FD,mFD) was 1.136±0.039. Average FD per patient (global FD,gFD) was 1.145±0.039. FD was independent of other plaque characteristics. mFD significantly correlated with plasma HDL (r = -0.367,p = 0.02) and triglycerides-to-HDL ratio (r = 0.480,p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Fractal analysis is a novel, readily available, reproducible and inexpensive technique for the quantitative measurement of plaque irregularity. The correlation between low HDL levels and plaque FD suggests a role for HDL in the acquisition of morphologic features of plaque instability. Further studies are needed to validate the prognostic value of fractal analysis in carotid plaques evaluation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Fractal analysis of a plaque…
Fig 1. Fractal analysis of a plaque located in the right carotid artery of a representative subject.
Panel A shows the longitudinal view of a non-obstructive plaque located in the right common carotid artery. Panel B shows the same image after binarization using a modified IsoData algorithm, while Panel C displays contour extraction by computing edges in the areas of highest gradient magnitude using the Sobel operator. Panel D shows two grids of different scales generated as part of the evaluation of fractal dimension (FD) using a box counting algorithm. The FD of the plaque border corresponds to the opposite of the slope of logarithmic plot of the number of boxes containing the objects (Y, Ln Count) vs. the dimension of the boxes side (X, Lnε). The higher is the FD, the higher is the irregularity of the plaque surface.
Fig 2. Fractal analysis of all segments…
Fig 2. Fractal analysis of all segments involved by atherosclerosis in a representative subject.
Panel A shows the image of the right carotid bifurcation, in which segments affected by atherosclerosis can be identified: the internal carotid artery (denoted with c) and the carotid bulb, the latter by a plaque extending in the external carotid artery (d). Panel B displays the left carotid bifurcation of the same patient. Again, two involved segments can be identified: the internal carotid artery (by a plaque extending from the carotid bulb, e) and the carotid bulb (f). Panels C-F display the magnified contour extracted from plaque c-f respectively. Fractal dimension (FD) for each contour is indicated in each panel. The total number of involved segments in this patient was 4. Average FD was 1.137.
Fig 3. Bland Altman plot for fractal…
Fig 3. Bland Altman plot for fractal analysis.
Panel A shows Bland-Altman plot for inter-operator reproducibility analysis, while Panel B shows results for intra-operator analysis.
Fig 4. Correlation between fractal dimension, plasma…
Fig 4. Correlation between fractal dimension, plasma HDL cholesterol and triglycerides-to-HDL ratio.
Panel A-B compare and contrast two representative patients. The subject in Panel A appear to have a higher plaque border complexity and lower HDL-C compared to the subject in panel B. Lower panels show a magnified image of plaque contour. Panel C displays the scatter plot of fractal dimension versus HDL-C, while Panel D shows the scatter plot of fractal dimension versus triglycerides-to-HDL ratio. HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol; FD = fractal dimension; Trig:HDL = triglycerides-to-HDL ratio.

References

    1. Petty GW, Brown RD Jr., Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O'Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke. 1999;30(12):2513–6. Epub 1999/12/03. .
    1. Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP. Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke. 2000;31(3):615–21. Epub 2000/03/04. .
    1. Prabhakaran S, Rundek T, Ramas R, Elkind MS, Paik MC, Boden-Albala B, et al. Carotid plaque surface irregularity predicts ischemic stroke: the northern Manhattan study. Stroke. 2006;37(11):2696–701. Epub 2006/09/30. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2654324.
    1. Prati P, Tosetto A, Casaroli M, Bignamini A, Canciani L, Bornstein N, et al. Carotid plaque morphology improves stroke risk prediction: usefulness of a new ultrasonographic score. Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2011;31(3):300–4. Epub 2011/01/08. doi: .
    1. Romero JR, Beiser A, Seshadri S, Benjamin EJ, Polak JF, Vasan RS, et al. Carotid artery atherosclerosis, MRI indices of brain ischemia, aging, and cognitive impairment: the Framingham study. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2009;40(5):1590–6. Epub 2009/03/07. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2705324.
    1. Brinjikji W, Huston J 3rd, Rabinstein AA, Kim GM, Lerman A, Lanzino G. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. Journal of neurosurgery. 2016;124(1):27–42. Epub 2015/08/01. doi: .
    1. Gomory R. Benoit Mandelbrot (1924–2010). Nature. 2010;468(7322):378 Epub 2010/11/19. doi: .
    1. Captur G, Karperien AL, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Moon JC. The fractal heart—embracing mathematics in the cardiology clinic. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2017;14(1):56–64. Epub 2016/11/05. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc5218578.
    1. Captur G, Muthurangu V, Cook C, Flett AS, Wilson R, Barison A, et al. Quantification of left ventricular trabeculae using fractal analysis. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2013;15:36 Epub 2013/05/15. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3680331.
    1. Ammirati E, Moroni F, Magnoni M, Di Terlizzi S, Villa C, Sizzano F, et al. Circulating CD14+ and CD14highCD16- classical monocytes are reduced in patients with signs of plaque neovascularization in the carotid artery. Atherosclerosis. 2016;255:171–8. Epub 2016/10/19. doi: .
    1. D'Agostino RB Sr., Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743–53. Epub 2008/01/24. doi: .
    1. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology. 2003;229(2):340–6. Epub 2003/09/23. doi: .
    1. Pourcelot L, Tranquart F, De Bray JM, Philippot M, Bonithon MC, Salez F. Ultrasound characterization and quantification of carotid atherosclerosis lesions. Minerva cardioangiologica. 1999;47(1–2):15–24. Epub 1999/06/05. .
    1. Moroni F, Ammirati E, Magnoni M, D'Ascenzo F, Anselmino M, Anzalone N, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis, silent ischemic brain damage and brain atrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of cardiology. 2016;223:681–7. Epub 2016/08/30. doi: .
    1. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. Epub 2012/06/30. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3855844.
    1. Ahammer H, DeVaney TT. The influence of edge detection algorithms on the estimation of the fractal dimension of binary digital images. Chaos (Woodbury, NY). 2004;14(1):183–8. Epub 2004/03/09. doi: .
    1. Captur G, Lopes LR, Patel V, Li C, Bassett P, Syrris P, et al. Abnormal cardiac formation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: fractal analysis of trabeculae and preclinical gene expression. Circulation Cardiovascular genetics. 2014;7(3):241–8. Epub 2014/04/08. doi: .
    1. Millan-Nunez J, Mantilla-Morato T, Toro R, Millan-Perez JJ, Mangas-Rojas A. Cardiometabolic Risk Related to the Association of hypertriglyceridemia-Low HDLc. Current pharmaceutical design. 2016;22(3):365–71. Epub 2015/11/13. .
    1. John AM, Elfanagely O, Ayala CA, Cohen M, Prestigiacomo CJ. The utility of fractal analysis in clinical neuroscience. Reviews in the neurosciences. 2015;26(6):633–45. Epub 2015/07/22. doi: .
    1. Lennon FE, Cianci GC, Cipriani NA, Hensing TA, Zhang HJ, Chen CT, et al. Lung cancer-a fractal viewpoint. Nature reviews Clinical oncology. 2015;12(11):664–75. Epub 2015/07/15. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4989864.
    1. Teng Z, Sadat U, Ji G, Zhu C, Young VE, Graves MJ, et al. Lumen irregularity dominates the relationship between mechanical stress condition, fibrous-cap thickness, and lumen curvature in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Journal of biomechanical engineering. 2011;133(3):034501 Epub 2011/02/10. doi: .
    1. Chiu B, Beletsky V, Spence JD, Parraga G, Fenster A. Analysis of carotid lumen surface morphology using three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Physics in medicine and biology. 2009;54(5):1149–67. Epub 2009/01/29. doi: .
    1. Tegos TJ, Kalomiris KJ, Sabetai MM, Kalodiki E, Nicolaides AN. Significance of sonographic tissue and surface characteristics of carotid plaques. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2001;22(8):1605–12. Epub 2001/09/18. .
    1. Kanber B, Hartshorne TC, Horsfield MA, Naylor AR, Robinson TG, Ramnarine KV. Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque surface irregularities and correlation to cerebrovascular symptoms. Cardiovascular ultrasound. 2013;11:38 Epub 2013/11/08. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4228278.
    1. Tiozzo E, Gardener H, Hudson BI, Dong C, Della-Morte D, Crisby M, et al. High-density lipoprotein subfractions and carotid plaque: the Northern Manhattan Study. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237(1):163–8. Epub 2014/09/23. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4890152.
    1. Perez HA, Garcia NH, Spence JD, Armando LJ. Adding carotid total plaque area to the Framingham risk score improves cardiovascular risk classification. Archives of medical science: AMS. 2016;12(3):513–20. Epub 2016/06/10. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4889685.
    1. Campbell S, Genest J. HDL-C: clinical equipoise and vascular endothelial function. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2013;11(3):343–53. Epub 2013/03/09. doi: .
    1. Orlandi A, Marcellini M, Spagnoli LG. Aging influences development and progression of early aortic atherosclerotic lesions in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2000;20(4):1123–36. Epub 2000/04/15. .
    1. Holven KB, Retterstol K, Ueland T, Ulven SM, Nenseter MS, Sandvik M, et al. Subjects with low plasma HDL cholesterol levels are characterized by an inflammatory and oxidative phenotype. PloS one. 2013;8(11):e78241 Epub 2013/11/19. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3823918.
    1. Ammirati E, Moroni F, Norata GD, Magnoni M, Camici PG. Markers of inflammation associated with plaque progression and instability in patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Mediators of inflammation. 2015;2015:718329 Epub 2015/05/12. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4415469.
    1. Newby AC. Metalloproteinase production from macrophages—a perfect storm leading to atherosclerotic plaque rupture and myocardial infarction. Experimental physiology. 2016;101(11):1327–37. Epub 2016/11/02. doi: .
    1. Boizel R, Benhamou PY, Lardy B, Laporte F, Foulon T, Halimi S. Ratio of triglycerides to HDL cholesterol is an indicator of LDL particle size in patients with type 2 diabetes and normal HDL cholesterol levels. Diabetes care. 2000;23(11):1679–85. Epub 2000/11/25. .
    1. Kim TN, Kim S, Yang SJ, Yoo HJ, Seo JA, Kim SG, et al. Vascular inflammation in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes: analysis with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2010;3(2):142–8. Epub 2010/01/12. doi: .
    1. Urbina EM, Khoury PR, McCoy CE, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Kimball TR. Triglyceride to HDL-C ratio and increased arterial stiffness in children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):e1082–90. Epub 2013/03/06. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3608484.
    1. da Luz PL, Favarato D, Faria-Neto JR Jr., Lemos P, Chagas AC. High ratio of triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol predicts extensive coronary disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2008;63(4):427–32. Epub 2008/08/23. PubMed doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2664115.
    1. Sigala F, Kotsinas A, Savari P, Filis K, Markantonis S, Iliodromitis EK, et al. Oxidized LDL in human carotid plaques is related to symptomatic carotid disease and lesion instability. Journal of vascular surgery. 2010;52(3):704–13. Epub 2010/06/25. doi: .

Source: PubMed

3
購読する