Effectiveness of an osteopathic treatment on the autonomic nervous system: a systematic review of the literature

Verena Rechberger, Michael Biberschick, Jan Porthun, Verena Rechberger, Michael Biberschick, Jan Porthun

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of an osteopathic treatment on the autonomic nervous system (ANS). For this purpose, published primary studies were analysed and critically evaluated.

Method: To generate this review, 15 electronic databases were systematically searched for studies. Randomized clinical controlled trials (RCT) and clinical controlled trials (CCT) are included in the review and evaluated with appropriate assessment tools (Downs and Black Checklist and the checklist from Kienle and Kiene).

Results: 23 published studies (10 RCT, 1 clinic multi-centre study, 1 CCT, 5 randomized cross-over studies, 5 randomized pilot studies and 1 single case study) are included in this review. The studies were evaluated with the assessment tools according to their quality. 3 studies are graded as high quality, 11 as moderate and 8 as low-quality studies.

Conclusion: The included published studies represent a good level of evidence. Due to a small number of subjects and no follow-ups, the methodological quality is rated as moderate. A significant change on the ANS was shown in studies including High-Velocity Low-Amplitude Techniques (HVLAT). No statement could be drawn in studies in which they used cranial osteopathic techniques due to the lack of methodological quality. A significant change on the ANS is shown in the treatment of the suboccipital region. In studies which evaluated the effectiveness of mobilization in the cervical and thoracic region, no statement could be displayed due to a low level of evidence. None of the findings in these studies have given statements if ANS activation takes place in the sympathetic or parasympathetic system.

Keywords: Autonomic nervous system; Osteopathy; Treatment techniques.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no personal financial or institutional interest in any of the materials or devices described in this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study selection

References

    1. Nicholas AS, Nicholas EA. Atlas osteopathischer Techniken, 1. München: Urban und Fischer; 2009.
    1. Mayer J. (Hrsg.) Standen, Lehrbuch Osteopathische Medizin, 1. München: Elselvier; 2016.
    1. Dierlmeier D. Nervensystem in der Osteopathie Periphere Nerven, Gehirn- und Rückenmarkshäute. Vegetativum: Thieme; 2015.
    1. Trepel M. Neuroanatomie: Struktur und Funktion; mit Tabellen, 2. überarbeitete. Mär. München; Jena: Urban und Fischer; 1999.
    1. Benchmarks for training in traditional osteopathy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. Welch A, Boone R. Sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to specific diversified adjustments to chiropractic vertebral subluxations of the cervical and thoracic spine. J Chiropr Med. 2008;7(3):86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2008.04.001.
    1. Henderson AT, Fisher JF, Blair J, Shea C, Li TS, Bridges KG. Effects of rib raising on the autonomic nervous system: a pilot study using noninvasive biomarkers. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010;110(6):324.
    1. Curi AC, Alves AS, Silva JG. Cardiac autonomic response after cranial technique of the fourth ventricle (cv4) compression in systemic hypertensive subjects’. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;22:666–672. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.11.013.
    1. Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
    1. Downs SH, Black N. ‘The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377–384. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377.
    1. Kienle GS, Kiene H. Kriterien für die Erstellung therapeutischer Einzelfallberichte in der Onkologie. Merkurstab. 2003;56(1):2–5.
    1. Jäkel A, von Hauenschild P. Therapeutic effects of cranial osteopathic manipulative medicine: a systematic review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(12):685.
    1. Ruffini N, D’Alessandro G, Mariani N, Pollastrelli A, Cardinali L, Cerritelli F. Variations of high frequency parameter of heart rate variability following osteopathic manipulative treatment in healthy subjects compared to control group and sham therapy: randomized controlled trial. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:272. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00272.
    1. Fornari Mauro. Single osteopathic manipulative therapy session dampens acute autonomic and neuroendocrine responses to mental stress in healthy male participants. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2017;117:559–567. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.110.
    1. Scoppa F, Pirino A, Belloni G, Gallamini M, Messina G, Iovane A. Postural and autonomic modifications following osteopathic manipulative treatment (omt): comparison between two techniques: a pilot study. Acta Medica Mediterr. 2018;2:431–436.
    1. Milnes K, Moran RW. Physiological effects of a CV4 cranial osteopathic technique on autonomic nervous system function: a preliminary investigation. Int J Osteopath Med. 2007;10(1):8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2007.01.003.
    1. Shi X, Rehrer S, Prajapati P, Stoll ST, Gamber RG, Downey H. Effect of cranial osteopathic manipulative medicine on cerebral tissue oxygenation. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(12):660.
    1. Cardoso AP, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Riquelme-Agulló I, Heredia-Rizo AM, Ricard F, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á. Effects of the fourth ventricle compression in the regulation of the autonomic nervous system: a randomized control trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:1–6.
    1. Touche R, et al. Does mobilization of the upper cervical spine affect pain sensitivity and autonomic nervous system function in patients with cervico-craniofacial pain?: a randomized-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2013;29:3. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318250f3cd.
    1. Roy RA, Boucher JP, Comtois AS. Heart rate variability modulation after manipulation in pain-free patients vs patients in pain. J Manipul Physiol Ther. 2009;32(4):277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.03.003.
    1. Win NN, Jorgensen AMS, Chen YS, Haneline MT. Effects of upper and lower cervical spinal manipulative therapy on blood pressure and heart rate variability in volunteers and patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled, cross-over, preliminary study. J Chiropr Med. 2015;14(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2014.12.005.
    1. Zhang J, Dean D, Nosco D, Strathopulos D, Floros M. Effect of chiropractic care on heart rate variability and pain in a multisite clinical study. J Manipul Physiol Ther. 2006;29(4):267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.010.
    1. Younes M, Nowakowski K, Didier-Laurent B, Gombert M, Cottin F. Effect of spinal manipulative treatment on cardiovascular autonomic control in patients with acute low back pain. Chiropr Man Ther. 2017;25(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0167-6.
    1. Fukuda H, et al. Cerebral metabolic changes in men after chiropractic spinal manipulation for neck pain. AlternTher Health Med. 2011;17:6.
    1. Driscoll MD, Hall MJ. Effects of spinal manipulative therapy on autonomic activity and the cardiovascular system: a case study using the electrocardiogram and arterial tonometry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(8):545–550. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.109677.
    1. Petersen N, Vicenzino B, Wright A. The effects of a cervical mobilisation technique on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Physiother Theory Pract. 1993;9(3):149–156. doi: 10.3109/09593989309047454.
    1. Chiu TW, Wright A. To compare the effects of different rates of application of a cervical mobilisation technique on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 1996;1(4):198–203.
    1. Jowsey P, Perry J. Sympathetic nervous system effects in the hands following a grade III postero-anterior rotatory mobilisation technique applied to T4: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Man Ther. 2010;15(3):248–253. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.008.
    1. Giles PD, Hensel KL, Pacchia CF, Smith ML. Suboccipital decompression enhances heart rate variability indices of cardiac control in healthy subjects. J Altern Complement Med. 2013;19(2):92–96. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0031.
    1. Purdy WR, Frank JJ, Oliver B. Suboccipital dermatomyotomic stimulation and digital blood flow. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1996;96(5):285. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.1996.96.5.285.
    1. Budgell B, Hirano F. Innocuous mechanical stimulation of the neck and alterations in heart-rate variability in healthy young adults. Auton. Neurosci. 2001;91(1–2):96–99. doi: 10.1016/S1566-0702(01)00306-X.
    1. Gibbons PF, Gosling CM, Holmes M. Short-term effects of cervical manipulation on edge light pupil cycle time: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(7):465–469. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.108820.
    1. Malik M, et al. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J. 1996;17(3):354–381. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する