Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ertugliflozin in Healthy Japanese and Western Subjects

Yinhua Li, Gianluca Nucci, Yuichi Yamamoto, Daryl J Fediuk, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe, Yinhua Li, Gianluca Nucci, Yuichi Yamamoto, Daryl J Fediuk, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe

Abstract

Ertugliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, is approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes. This randomized, double-blind (sponsor-open) study in healthy Japanese subjects and open-label study in Western subjects assessed ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cohort A received 3 ascending single doses of ertugliflozin (1, 5, and 25 mg; n = 6 Japanese, n = 6 Western) or placebo (n = 3 Japanese) under fasted conditions. Cohort B received multiple once-daily doses of ertugliflozin 25 mg (n = 6 Japanese) or placebo (n = 3 Japanese) for 7 days under fed conditions. For Japanese subjects in Cohort A, maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax ) were observed 1 to 1.5 hours after dosing, and apparent mean terminal half-life was 12.4 to 13.6 hours. The ratios of the geometric means (Japanese/Western) for ertugliflozin 1-, 5-, and 25-mg single doses were 95.94%, 99.66%, and 90.32%, respectively, for area under the plasma concentration-time curve and 107.59%, 97.47%, and 80.04%, respectively, for Cmax . Area under the plasma concentration-time curve and Cmax increased in a dose-proportional manner. For Cohort B, Cmax was observed 2.5 hours after dosing (days 1 and 7), and steady state was reached by day 4. The 24-hour urinary glucose excretion was dose dependent. Ertugliflozin was generally well tolerated. There were no meaningful differences in exposure, urinary glucose excretion, and safety between Japanese and Western subjects.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01223339.

Keywords: Japanese; PD; PK; SGLT2 inhibitor; ertugliflozin; type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

Y.L. and Y.Y. are employees of Pfizer Research and Development, Japan. G.N. is an employee of Pfizer Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. D.J.F. and V.S. are employees of Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut. All authors may own shares/stock options in Pfizer Inc.

© 2021 Pfizer Inc. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (standard deviation) plasma ertugliflozin concentration‐time profile in Cohort A in (A) linear (principal plot) with the 0‐ to 12‐hour interval on an expanded time scale (inset plot) and (B) semilogarithmic scales. Summary statistics were calculated by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (0.500 ng/mL) to 0.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual, geometric, and arithmetic mean plasma ertugliflozin dose‐normalized (A) Cmax and (B) AUCinf values by dose and population in Cohort A. Open circles and triangles identify individual subject data; closed circles and triangles identify geometric means. Offset crosses identify arithmetic mean (with standard deviation). Box plots provide medians, and 25% and 75% quartiles with whiskers extended to the minimum/maximum values. AUClast, AUC from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration; dn, dose‐normalized.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (standard deviation) plasma ertugliflozin concentration‐time profile in Cohort B in (A) linear (principal plot) with the 0‐ to 12‐hour interval on an expanded time scale (inset plot) and (B) semilogarithmic scales. Summary statistics were calculated by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (0.500 ng/mL) to 0.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Individual and arithmetic mean UGE24 by (A) treatment (ertugliflozin 1, 5, and 25 mg or placebo) and population (healthy Japanese and Western subjects) in Cohort A and by (B) treatment (ertugliflozin 25 mg or placebo) and dosing day (day 1 and 7) in healthy Japanese subjects in Cohort B. Open circles and triangles identify individual subject data; closed circles and triangles identify arithmetic means. Box plots provide medians, and 25% and 75% quartiles with whiskers extended to the minimum/maximum values. UGE24, culmulative urinary glucose excretion over 24 hours.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A total of 24‐hour inhibition of glucose reabsorption by (A) treatment (ertugliflozin 1, 5, and 25 mg or placebo) and population (healthy Japanese and Western subjects) in Cohort A and by (B) treatment (ertugliflozin 25 mg or placebo) and dosing day (days 1 and 7) in healthy Japanese subjects in Cohort B. Open circles and triangles identify individual subject data; closed circles and triangles identify arithmetic means. Box plots provide medians, and 25% and 75% quartiles with whiskers extended to the minimum/maximum values. A total of 24‐hour inhibition (%) of glucose reabsorption was calculated using the equation UGE24/(estimated glomerular filtration rate [mL/min] × fasting glucose concentration [mg•h/dL]) × 0.0144.

References

    1. Abdul‐Ghani MA, Norton L, DeFronzo RA.Renal sodium‐glucose cotransporter inhibition in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;309(11):F889‐F900.
    1. Kalgutkar AS, Tugnait M, Zhu T, et al. Preclinical species and human disposition of PF‐04971729, a selective inhibitor of the sodium‐dependent glucose cotransporter 2 and clinical candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39(9):1609‐1619.
    1. Miao Z, Nucci G, Amin N, et al. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of the antidiabetic agent ertugliflozin (PF‐04971729) in healthy male subjects. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41(2):445‐456.
    1. Cannon CP, Pratley R, Dagogo‐Jack S, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with ertugliflozin in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1425‐1435.
    1. Grunberger G, Camp S, Johnson J, et al. Ertugliflozin in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the VERTIS RENAL randomized study. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(1):49‐66.
    1. Hollander P, Liu J, Hill J, et al. Ertugliflozin compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin: the VERTIS SU randomized study. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(1):193‐207.
    1. Miller S, Krumins T, Zhou H, et al. Ertugliflozin and sitagliptin co‐initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes: the VERTIS SITA randomized study. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(1):253‐268.
    1. Pratley RE, Eldor R, Raji A, et al. Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: the VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(5):1111‐1120.
    1. Rosenstock J, Frias J, Páll D, et al. Effect of ertugliflozin on glucose control, body weight, blood pressure and bone density in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy (VERTIS MET). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(3):520‐529.
    1. Terra SG, Focht K, Davies M, et al. Phase III, efficacy and safety study of ertugliflozin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(5):721‐728.
    1. Ji L, Liu Y, Miao H, et al. Safety and efficacy of ertugliflozin in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: VERTIS Asia. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(6):1474‐1482.
    1. Fediuk DJ, Nucci N, Dawra VK, et al. Overview of the clinical pharmacology of ertugliflozin, a novel sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(8):949‐965.
    1. Sahasrabudhe V, Fediuk DJ, Matschke K, et al. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin and its fixed‐dose combinations ertugliflozin/sitagliptin and ertugliflozin/metformin. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2019;8(5):619‐627.
    1. Fediuk DJ, Zhou S, Dawra V, Sahasrabudhe V, Sweeney K. Population pharmacokinetic model for ertugliflozin in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021;10(7):696‐706.
    1. Dawra VK, Sahasrabudhe V, Liang Y, et al. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin in healthy subjects. Clin Ther. 2018;40(9):1538‐1547.
    1. Dawra VK, Cutler DL, Zhou S, et al. Assessment of the drug interaction potential of ertugliflozin with sitagliptin, metformin, glimepiride, or simvastatin in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2019;8(3):314‐325.
    1. Sahasrabudhe V, Terra SG, Hickman A, et al. The effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ertugliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57(11):1432‐1443.
    1. Sahasrabudhe V, Terra SG, Hickman A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of single‐dose ertugliflozin in patients with hepatic impairment. Clin Ther. 2018;40(10):1701‐1710.
    1. Nucci G, Le V, Sweeney K, Amin N.Single‐ and multiple‐dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ertugliflozin, an oral selective inhibitor of SGLT2, in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103(S1):S83.
    1. Li Y, Mu Y, Shi H, et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of single and multiple doses of ertugliflozin, a selective inhibitor of SGLT2, in Healthy Chinese Subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020;9(1):97‐106.
    1. Liang Y, Sahasrabudhe V, Tensfeldt T, et al. Meta‐analysis of non‐compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of ertugliflozin to evaluate dose proportionality and effect of UGT1A9 polymorphism on exposure. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018;45(1):W‐066.
    1. Hwang MS, Lee SJ, Jeong HE, Lee S, Yoo MA, Shin JG.Genetic variations in UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 gene (UGT2B7) in a Korean population. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2010;25(4):398‐402.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する