The neurons that restore walking after paralysis
Claudia Kathe, Michael A Skinnider, Thomas H Hutson, Nicola Regazzi, Matthieu Gautier, Robin Demesmaeker, Salif Komi, Steven Ceto, Nicholas D James, Newton Cho, Laetitia Baud, Katia Galan, Kaya J E Matson, Andreas Rowald, Kyungjin Kim, Ruijia Wang, Karen Minassian, John O Prior, Leonie Asboth, Quentin Barraud, Stéphanie P Lacour, Ariel J Levine, Fabien Wagner, Jocelyne Bloch, Jordan W Squair, Grégoire Courtine, Claudia Kathe, Michael A Skinnider, Thomas H Hutson, Nicola Regazzi, Matthieu Gautier, Robin Demesmaeker, Salif Komi, Steven Ceto, Nicholas D James, Newton Cho, Laetitia Baud, Katia Galan, Kaya J E Matson, Andreas Rowald, Kyungjin Kim, Ruijia Wang, Karen Minassian, John O Prior, Leonie Asboth, Quentin Barraud, Stéphanie P Lacour, Ariel J Levine, Fabien Wagner, Jocelyne Bloch, Jordan W Squair, Grégoire Courtine
Abstract
A spinal cord injury interrupts pathways from the brain and brainstem that project to the lumbar spinal cord, leading to paralysis. Here we show that spatiotemporal epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the lumbar spinal cord1-3 applied during neurorehabilitation4,5 (EESREHAB) restored walking in nine individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. This recovery involved a reduction in neuronal activity in the lumbar spinal cord of humans during walking. We hypothesized that this unexpected reduction reflects activity-dependent selection of specific neuronal subpopulations that become essential for a patient to walk after spinal cord injury. To identify these putative neurons, we modelled the technological and therapeutic features underlying EESREHAB in mice. We applied single-nucleus RNA sequencing6-9 and spatial transcriptomics10,11 to the spinal cords of these mice to chart a spatially resolved molecular atlas of recovery from paralysis. We then employed cell type12,13 and spatial prioritization to identify the neurons involved in the recovery of walking. A single population of excitatory interneurons nested within intermediate laminae emerged. Although these neurons are not required for walking before spinal cord injury, we demonstrate that they are essential for the recovery of walking with EES following spinal cord injury. Augmenting the activity of these neurons phenocopied the recovery of walking enabled by EESREHAB, whereas ablating them prevented the recovery of walking that occurs spontaneously after moderate spinal cord injury. We thus identified a recovery-organizing neuronal subpopulation that is necessary and sufficient to regain walking after paralysis. Moreover, our methodology establishes a framework for using molecular cartography to identify the neurons that produce complex behaviours.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare competing interests: G.C., J.B., F.W., L.A., R.D., S.K., S.P.L. and J.W.S. hold various patents in relation to the present work. G.C. is a consultant for ONWARD medical. G.C., J.B. and S.P.L. are minority shareholders of ONWARD, a company related to the presented work. The other authors declare no competing interests.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Figures
References
- Wagner FB, et al. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018;563:65–71.
- Capogrosso M, et al. A brain–spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates. Nature. 2016;539:284–288.
- Wenger N, et al. Spatiotemporal neuromodulation therapies engaging muscle synergies improve motor control after spinal cord injury. Nat. Med. 2016;22:138–145.
- Courtine G, et al. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat. Neurosci. 2009;12:1333–1342.
- van den Brand R, et al. Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science. 2012;336:1182–1185.
- Grindberg RV, et al. RNA-sequencing from single nuclei. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:19802–19807.
- Lacar B, et al. Nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11022.
- Lake BB, et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science. 2016;352:1586–1590.
- Sathyamurthy A, et al. Massively parallel single nucleus transcriptional profiling defines spinal cord neurons and their activity during behavior. Cell Rep. 2018;22:2216–2225.
- Ståhl PL, et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science. 2016;353:78–82.
- Maniatis S, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of molecular pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2019;364:89–93.
- Skinnider MA, et al. Cell type prioritization in single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2021;39:30–34.
- Squair JW, Skinnider MA, Gautier M, Foster LJ, Courtine G. Prioritization of cell types responsive to biological perturbations in single-cell data with Augur. Nat. Protoc. 2021;16:3836–3873.
- Sherrington, C. S. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System (Yale Univ. Press, 1906).
- Courtine G, Sofroniew MV. Spinal cord repair: advances in biology and technology. Nat. Med. 2019;25:898–908.
- Arber S, Costa RM. Connecting neuronal circuits for movement. Science. 2018;360:1403–1404.
- Minassian K, McKay WB, Binder H, Hofstoetter US. Targeting lumbar spinal neural circuitry by epidural stimulation to restore motor function after spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13:284–294.
- Rowald A, et al. Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat. Med. 2022;28:260–271.
- Gill ML, et al. Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1677–1682.
- Angeli CA, et al. Recovery of over-ground walking after chronic motor complete spinal cord injury. New Engl. J. Med. 2019;379:1244–1250.
- Rejc E, Angeli CA, Atkinson D, Harkema SJ. Motor recovery after activity-based training with spinal cord epidural stimulation in a chronic motor complete paraplegic. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:13476.
- Mignardot J-B, et al. A multidirectional gravity-assist algorithm that enhances locomotor control in patients with stroke or spinal cord injury. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017;9:eaah3621.
- Tomer R, Ye L, Hsueh B, Deisseroth K. Advanced CLARITY for rapid and high-resolution imaging of intact tissues. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9:1682–1697.
- Von Zitzewitz J, et al. A neurorobotic platform for locomotor prosthetic development in rats and mice. J. Neural Eng. 2016;13:026007.
- Gradinaru V, Mogri M, Thompson KR, Henderson JM, Deisseroth K. Optical deconstruction of Parkinsonian neural circuitry. Science. 2009;324:354–359.
- Zhang F, et al. Optogenetic interrogation of neural circuits: technology for probing mammalian brain structures. Nat. Protoc. 2010;5:439–456.
- Klapoetke NC, et al. Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:338–346.
- Asboth L, et al. Cortico–reticulo–spinal circuit reorganization enables functional recovery after severe spinal cord contusion. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21:576–588.
- Bullitt E. Expression of c-Fos-like protein as a marker for neuronal activity following noxious stimulation in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 1990;296:517–530.
- Stuart T, et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–1902.e21.
- Häring M, et al. Neuronal atlas of the dorsal horn defines its architecture and links sensory input to transcriptional cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21:869–880.
- Zeisel A, et al. Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell. 2018;174:999–1014.e22.
- Russ DE, et al. A harmonized atlas of spinal cord cell types and their computational classification. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5722.
- Rood JE, et al. Toward a common coordinate framework for the human body. Cell. 2019;179:1455–1467.
- Hayashi M, et al. Graded arrays of spinal and supraspinal V2a interneuron subtypes underlie forelimb and hindlimb motor control. Neuron. 2018;97:869–884.
- Biancalani T, et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nat. Methods. 2021;18:1352–1362.
- Capogrosso M, et al. A computational model for epidural electrical stimulation of spinal sensorimotor circuits. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:19326–19340.
- Formento E, et al. Electrical spinal cord stimulation must preserve proprioception to enable locomotion in humans with spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21:1728–1741.
- Beauparlant J, et al. Undirected compensatory plasticity contributes to neuronal dysfunction after severe spinal cord injury. Brain. 2013;136:3347–3361.
- Kathe C, et al. Wireless closed-loop optogenetics across the entire dorsoventral spinal cord in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022;40:198–209.
- Zhong G, et al. Electrophysiological characterization of V2a interneurons and their locomotor-related activity in the neonatal mouse spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:170–182.
- Dougherty KJ, Kiehn O. Functional organization of V2a-related locomotor circuits in the rodent spinal cord. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2010;1198:85–93.
- Dougherty KJ, Kiehn O. Firing and cellular properties of V2a interneurons in the rodent spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:24–37.
- Zholudeva LV, et al. Spinal interneurons as gatekeepers to neuroplasticity after injury or disease. J. Neurosci. 2021;41:845–854.
- Azim E, Jiang J, Alstermark B, Jessell TM. Skilled reaching relies on a V2a propriospinal internal copy circuit. Nature. 2014;508:357–363.
- Kiehn O. Decoding the organization of spinal circuits that control locomotion. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016;17:224–238.
- Ferreira-Pinto MJ, Ruder L, Capelli P, Arber S. Connecting circuits for supraspinal control of locomotion. Neuron. 2018;100:361–374.
- Goulding M. Circuits controlling vertebrate locomotion: moving in a new direction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;10:507–518.
- Zhang J, et al. V1 and V2b interneurons secure the alternating flexor-extensor motor activity mice require for limbed locomotion. Neuron. 2014;82:138–150.
- Bikoff JB, et al. Spinal inhibitory interneuron diversity delineates variant motor microcircuits. Cell. 2016;165:207–219.
- Osseward PJ, et al. Conserved genetic signatures parcellate cardinal spinal neuron classes into local and projection subsets. Science. 2021;372:385–393.
- Clavo B, et al. Modification of glucose metabolism in radiation-induced brain injury areas using cervical spinal cord stimulation. Acta Neurochir. 2009;151:1419–1425.
- Do BH, et al. Pattern of 18F-FDG uptake in the spinal cord in patients with non-central nervous system malignancy. Spine. 2011;36:E1395–E1401.
- Kirshblum SC, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011) J. Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:535–546.
- Enright PL. The six-minute walk test. Respir. Care. 2003;48:783–785.
- Van Hedel HJ, Dietz V, Curt A. Assessment of walking speed and distance in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2007;21:295–301.
- Grimm D, et al. In vitro and in vivo gene therapy vector evolution via multispecies interbreeding and retargeting of adeno-associated viruses. J. Virol. 2008;82:5887–5911.
- Scheff SW, Rabchevsky AG, Fugaccia I, Main JA, Lumpp JE., Jr Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device. J. Neurotrauma. 2003;20:179–193.
- Squair JW, et al. Neuroprosthetic baroreflex controls haemodynamics after spinal cord injury. Nature. 2021;590:308–314.
- Capogrosso M, et al. Configuration of electrical spinal cord stimulation through real-time processing of gait kinematics. Nat. Protoc. 2018;13:2031–2061.
- Courtine G, et al. Kinematic and EMG determinants in quadrupedal locomotion of a non-human primate (Rhesus) J. Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3127–3145.
- Takeoka A, Vollenweider I, Courtine G, Arber S. Muscle spindle feedback directs locomotor recovery and circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Cell. 2014;159:1626–1639.
- Esposito MS, Capelli P, Arber S. Brainstem nucleus MdV mediates skilled forelimb motor tasks. Nature. 2014;508:351–356.
- Armbruster BN, Li X, Pausch MH, Herlitze S, Roth BL. Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:5163–5168.
- Hutson TH, et al. Cbp-dependent histone acetylation mediates axon regeneration induced by environmental enrichment in rodent spinal cord injury models. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11:eaaw2064.
- Wang F, et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalinfixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J. Mol. Diagn. 2012;14:22–29.
- Chung K, et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature. 2013;497:332–337.
- Chung K, Deisseroth K. CLARITY for mapping the nervous system. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:508–513.
- Renier N, et al. iDISCO: a simple, rapid method to immunolabel large tissue samples for volume imaging. Cell. 2014;159:896–910.
- Renier N, et al. Mapping of brain activity by automated volume analysis of immediate early genes. Cell. 2016;165:1789–1802.
- Pan C, et al. Shrinkage-mediated imaging of entire organs and organisms using uDISCO. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:859–867.
- Voigt FF, et al. The mesoSPIM initiative: open-source light-sheet microscopes for imaging cleared tissue. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:1105–1108.
- Yger P, et al. A spike sorting toolbox for up to thousands of electrodes validated with ground truth recordings in vitro and in vivo. eLife. 2018;7:e34518.
- Tanaka H, Ono K, Shibasaki H, Isa T, Ikenaka K. Conduction properties of identified neural pathways in the central nervous system of mice in vivo. Neurosci. Res. 2004;49:113–122.
- La Manno G, et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature. 2018;560:494–498.
- Hafemeister C, Satija R. Normalization and variance stabilization of singlecell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol. 2019;20:296.
- Cable DM, et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022;40:517–526.
- Squair JW, et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5692.
- Hrvatin S, et al. Single-cell analysis of experience-dependent transcriptomic states in the mouse visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21:120–129.
- Korotkevich, G. et al. Fast gene set enrichment analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/060012 (2021).
- Zappia L, Oshlack A. Clustering trees: a visualization for evaluating clusterings at multiple resolutions. GigaScience. 2018;7:giy083.
- Zappia L, Phipson B, Oshlack A. Splatter: simulation of single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2017;18:174.
- Hines ML, Carnevale NT. The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput. 1997;9:1179–1209.
- Lu R, et al. Rapid mesoscale volumetric imaging of neural activity with synaptic resolution. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:291–294.
Source: PubMed