Intracortical inhibition in the soleus muscle is reduced during the control of upright standing in both young and old adults

Selma Papegaaij, Stéphane Baudry, János Négyesi, Wolfgang Taube, Tibor Hortobágyi, Selma Papegaaij, Stéphane Baudry, János Négyesi, Wolfgang Taube, Tibor Hortobágyi

Abstract

Purpose: In a previous study, we reported that a short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) decreases in old but not in young adults when standing on foam vs. a rigid surface. Here, we examined if such an age by task difficulty interaction in motor cortical excitability also occurs in easier standing tasks.

Methods: Fourteen young (23 ± 2.7 years) and fourteen old (65 ± 4.1 years) adults received transcranial magnetic brain stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation, while they stood with or without support on a force platform.

Results: In the soleus, we found that SICI was lower in unsupported (35 % inhibition) vs. supported (50 %) standing (p = 0.007) but similar in young vs. old adults (p = 0.591). In the tibialis anterior, SICI was similar between conditions (p = 0.597) but lower in old (52 %) vs. young (72 %) adults (p = 0.030). Age and standing with or without support did not affect the Hoffmann reflex in the soleus.

Conclusions: The current data suggest that the motor cortex is involved in standing control, and that its role becomes more prominent with an increase in task difficulty.

Keywords: Aging; Balance; Peripheral nerve stimulation; Short-interval intracortical inhibition; Transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of a unsupported and b supported standing conditions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Group data for young and old adults’ center of pressure velocity in the anteroposterior direction when standing supported (sup) and unsupported (unsup), showing a significant condition effect (p < 0.001). The horizontal line within the box indicates the median value, the box covers the 25th–75th percentiles, and the whiskers represent the range
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Group data for young and old adults of background EMG in a the soleus muscle (condition effect, p < 0.001) and b the tibialis anterior muscle (interaction effect, p = 0.035). MVC maximum voluntary contraction. The horizontal line within the box indicates the median value, the box covers the 25th–75th percentiles, and the whiskers represent the range
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Representative responses to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the soleus muscle of one 23-year-old male and one 62-year-old male subject while standing supported (sup) and unsupported (unsup). Waveforms represent the average of 10 motor evoked potentials in response to an unconditioned test pulse (thin gray line) and to a conditioned test pulse (thick black line) given at an interpulse interval of 2.5 ms. Black arrows indicate the time when the test pulse is given. Note the down-modulation of short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) when standing unsupported vs. supported in both young and old subjects
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Group data for a short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the soleus during supported and unsupported standing (condition effect, p = 0.007), b SICI in the soleus in young and old adults (no age effect), c intracortical facilitation (ICF) in the soleus, d SICI in the tibialis anterior during supported and unsupported standing (no condition effect), e SICI in the tibialis anterior in young and old adults (age effect, p = 0.030), and f ICF in the tibialis anterior muscle. Greater values for SICI and ICF represent more inhibition and facilitation, respectively. Sup supported and unsup unsupported. The horizontal line within the box indicates the median value, the box covers the 25th–75th percentiles, and the whiskers represent the range

References

    1. Angulo-Kinzler RM, Mynark RG, Koceja DM. Soleus H-reflex gain in elderly and young adults: modulation due to body position. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53:M120–M125. doi: 10.1093/gerona/53A.2.M120.
    1. Baudry S, Duchateau J. Age-related influence of vision and proprioception on Ia presynaptic inhibition in soleus muscle during upright stance. J Physiol. 2012;590:5541–5554. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.228932.
    1. Baudry S, Penzer F, Duchateau J. Vision and proprioception do not influence the excitability of the corticomotoneuronal pathway during upright standing in young and elderly adults. Neuroscience. 2014;268:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.026.
    1. Baudry S, Penzer F, Duchateau J. Input–output characteristics of soleus homonymous Ia afferents and corticospinal pathways during upright standing differ between young and elderly adults. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2014;210:667–677. doi: 10.1111/apha.12233.
    1. Beck S, Taube W, Gruber M, Amtage F, Gollhofer A, Schubert M. Task-specific changes in motor evoked potentials of lower limb muscles after different training interventions. Brain Res. 2007;1179:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.048.
    1. Brouwer B, Ashby P. Corticospinal projections to lower limb motoneurons in man. Exp Brain Res. 1992;89:649–654. doi: 10.1007/BF00229889.
    1. Demura S, Kitabayashi T, Aoki H. Body-sway characteristics during a static upright posture in the elderly. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2008;8:188–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2008.00469.x.
    1. Di Giulio I, Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Loram ID. The proprioceptive and agonist roles of gastrocnemius, soleus and tibialis anterior muscles in maintaining human upright posture. J Physiol. 2009;587:2399–2416. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.168690.
    1. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Meglio M, et al. Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:794–799. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00314-4.
    1. Garry MI, Thomson RH. The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states. Exp Brain Res. 2009;193:267–274. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1620-5.
    1. Geertsen SS, Zuur AT, Nielsen JB. Voluntary activation of ankle muscles is accompanied by subcortical facilitation of their antagonists. J Physiol. 2010;588:2391–2402. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.190678.
    1. Hansen NL, Conway BA, Halliday DM, et al. Reduction of common synaptic drive to ankle dorsiflexor motoneurons during walking in patients with spinal cord lesion. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:934–942. doi: 10.1152/jn.00082.2005.
    1. Heise KF, Zimerman M, Hoppe J, Gerloff C, Wegscheider K, Hummel FC. The aging motor system as a model for plastic changes of GABA-mediated intracortical inhibition and their behavioral relevance. J Neurosci. 2013;33:9039–9049. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4094-12.2013.
    1. Koceja DM, Mynark RG. Comparison of heteronymous monosynaptic Ia facilitation in young and elderly subjects in supine and standing positions. Int J Neurosci. 2000;103:1–17. doi: 10.3109/00207450009035005.
    1. Koceja DM, Markus CA, Trimble MH. Postural modulation of the soleus H reflex in young and old subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97:387–393. doi: 10.1016/0924-980X(95)00163-F.
    1. Kossev AR, Schrader C, Dauper J, Dengler R, Rollnik JD. Increased intracortical inhibition in middle-aged humans; a study using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2002;333:83–86. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00986-2.
    1. Marneweck M, Loftus A, Hammond G. Short-interval intracortical inhibition and manual dexterity in healthy aging. Neurosci Res. 2011;70:408–414. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2011.04.004.
    1. McGinley M, Hoffman RL, Russ DW, Thomas JS, Clark BC. Older adults exhibit more intracortical inhibition and less intracortical facilitation than young adults. Exp Gerontol. 2010;45:671–678. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.04.005.
    1. Oliviero A, Profice P, Tonali PA, et al. Effects of aging on motor cortex excitability. Neurosci Res. 2006;55:74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2006.02.002.
    1. Papegaaij S, Taube W, Hogenhout M, Baudry S, Hortobagyi T. Age-related decrease in motor cortical inhibition during standing under different sensory conditions. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:126.
    1. Raymakers JA, Samson MM, Verhaar HJ. The assessment of body sway and the choice of the stability parameter(s) Gait Posture. 2005;21:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.11.006.
    1. Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JC. Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:2234–2243. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02014.x.
    1. Sidhu SK, Cresswell AG, Carroll TJ. Short-interval intracortical inhibition in knee extensors during locomotor cycling. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2013;207:194–201. doi: 10.1111/apha.12004.
    1. Smith AE, Ridding MC, Higgins RD, Wittert GA, Pitcher JB. Cutaneous afferent input does not modulate motor intracortical inhibition in ageing men. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;34:1461–1469. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07869.x.
    1. Soto O, Valls-Sole J, Shanahan P, Rothwell J. Reduction of intracortical inhibition in soleus muscle during postural activity. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:1711–1717. doi: 10.1152/jn.00133.2006.
    1. Taube W, Schubert M, Gruber M, Beck S, Faist M, Gollhofer A. Direct corticospinal pathways contribute to neuromuscular control of perturbed stance. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101:420–429. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01447.2005.
    1. Taube W, Lundbye-Jensen J, Schubert M, Gollhofer A, Leukel C. Evidence that the cortical motor command for the initiation of dynamic plantarflexion consists of excitation followed by inhibition. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025657.
    1. Tokuno CD, Taube W, Cresswell AG. An enhanced level of motor cortical excitability during the control of human standing. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2009;195:385–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2008.01898.x.
    1. Trinastic JP, Kautz SA, McGregor K, et al. An fMRI study of the differences in brain activity during active ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Brain Imaging Behav. 2010;4:121–131. doi: 10.1007/s11682-010-9091-2.
    1. Yamaguchi T, Fujiwara T, Liu W, Liu M. Effects of pedaling exercise on the intracortical inhibition of cortical leg area. Exp Brain Res. 2012;218:401–406. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3026-7.
    1. Zoghi M, Nordstrom MA. Progressive suppression of intracortical inhibition during graded isometric contraction of a hand muscle is not influenced by hand preference. Exp Brain Res. 2007;177:266–274. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0669-2.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する