Static postural sway, proprioception, and maximal voluntary quadriceps contraction in patients with knee osteoarthritis and normal control subjects

B S Hassan, S Mockett, M Doherty, B S Hassan, S Mockett, M Doherty

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) have reduced static postural control, knee proprioceptive acuity, and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the quadriceps compared with normal controls, and to determine possible independent predictors of static postural sway.

Methods: 77 subjects with symptomatic and radiographic knee OA (58 women, 19 men; mean age 63.4 years, range 36-82) and 63 controls with asymptomatic and clinically normal knees (45 women, 18 men; mean age 63 years, range 46-85) underwent assessment of static postural sway. 108 subjects (59 patients, 49 controls) also underwent assessment of knee proprioceptive activity and MVC (including calculation of quadriceps activation). In patients with knee OA knee pain, stiffness, and functional disability were assessed using the WOMAC Index. The height (m) and weight (kg) of all subjects was assessed.

Results: Compared with controls, patients with knee OA were heavier (mean difference 15.3 kg, p<0.001), had increased postural lateral sway (controls: median 2.3, interquartile (IQ) range 1.8-2.9; patients: median 4.7, IQ range 1.9-4.7, p<0.001), reduced proprioceptive acuity (controls: mean 7.9, 95% CI 6.9 to 8.9; patients: mean 12.0, 95% CI 10.5 to 13.6, p<0.001), weaker quadriceps strength (controls: mean 22.5, 95% CI 19.9 to 24.6; patients: mean 14.7, 95% CI 12.5 to 16.9, p<0.001), and less percentage activation of quadriceps (controls: mean 87.4, 95% CI 80.7 to 94.2; patients: mean 66.0, 95% CI 58.8 to 73.2, p<0.001). The significant predictors of postural sway were knee pain and the ratio of MVC/body weight.

Conclusions: Compared with age and sex matched controls, subjects with symptomatic knee OA have quadriceps weakness, reduced knee proprioception, and increased postural sway. Pain and muscle strength may particularly influence postural sway. The interaction between physiological, structural, and functional abnormalities in knee OA deserves further study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots showing postural lateral sway in controls (n=63) and patients (n=77).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postural sway in anteroposterior direction on right foot (AP Right) and left foot (AP Left) for controls (n =63), and patients (n=77).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proprioceptive acuity (degrees) for controls (n=54) and patients (n=66).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Maximal voluntary contraction for controls (n=49) and patients (n=59).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage quadriceps activation for controls (n=47) and patients (n=57).

References

    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985 Feb;56(1):72-4
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Apr;(184):208-11
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;49(11):1288-91
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Feb;69(2):243-7
    1. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
    1. Med Prog Technol. 1990 May;16(1-2):31-51
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Jan;73(1):53-6
    1. J Rheumatol. 1991 Apr;18(4):591-8
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):232-6
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1992 Mar;31(3):189-92
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Feb;32(2):127-31
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993 Apr;52(4):258-62
    1. Clin Rheumatol. 1993 Jun;12(2):170-5
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Jan;25(1):13-8
    1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 May-Jun;76(3):235-41
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Nov;56(11):641-8
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Jul;56(7):401-2
    1. Age Ageing. 1998 Jan;27(1):55-62
    1. J Vestib Res. 1998 Sep-Oct;8(5):381-97
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):1939-50
    1. J Arthroplasty. 1998 Dec;13(8):916-22
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Oct;57(10):588-94
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Oct;57(10):595-601
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jan;124(1):80-8
    1. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999 Apr;9(2):104-9
    1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 Nov;6(6):374-6
    1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999 Jun;54(6):M281-7
    1. Pain. 1981 Feb;10(1):57-66
    1. Scand J Rheumatol. 1983;12(2):152-6
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10

Source: PubMed

3
購読する