Effects of a Web-based intervention for adults with chronic conditions on patient activation: online randomized controlled trial

Michael Solomon, Stephen L Wagner, James Goes, Michael Solomon, Stephen L Wagner, James Goes

Abstract

Background: With almost one-half of Americans projected to have at least one chronic condition before 2020, a vital role of the health care system is to develop informed, engaged individuals who are effective self-managers of their health. Self-management interventions (SMIs) delivered face-to-face or by telephone (traditional SMIs) are associated with improved self-management knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy, which are expressed by the composite construct of patient activation, a predictor of health outcomes. Web-based interventions to support self-management across the spectrum of chronic diseases have the potential to reach a broader population of patients for extended periods than do traditional SMIs. However, evidence of the effectiveness of Web-based interventions on patient activation is sparse. High-quality studies featuring controlled comparisons of patients with different chronic conditions are needed to explore the interaction of Web-based interventions and patient activation.

Objective: To explore the effect of a Web-based intervention on the patient activation levels of patients with chronic health conditions, measured as attitudes toward knowledge, skills, and confidence in self-managing health.

Methods: For this 12-week study, prospective participants were selected from the patient panel of a regional health care system in the United States. The 201 eligible participants were randomly assigned to two groups. Intervention group participants had access to MyHealth Online, a patient portal featuring interactive health applications accessible via the Internet. Control participants had access to a health education website featuring various topics. Patient activation was assessed pre- and posttest using the 13-item patient activation measure. Parametric statistical models (t test, analysis of variance, analysis of covariance) were applied to draw inferences.

Results: The Web-based intervention demonstrated a positive and significant effect on the patient activation levels of participants in the intervention group. A significant difference in posttest patient activation scores was found between the two groups (F(1,123) = 4.438, P = .04, r = .196). Patients starting at the most advanced development of patient activation (stage 4) in the intervention group did not demonstrate significant change compared with participants beginning at earlier stages.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to measure change in patient activation when a Web-based intervention is used by patients living with different chronic conditions. Results suggest that Web-based interventions increase patient activation and have the potential to enhance the self-management capabilities of the growing population of chronically ill people. Activated patients are more likely to adhere to recommended health care practices, which in turn leads to improved health outcomes. Designing Web-based interventions to target a specific stage of patient activation may optimize their effectiveness. For Web-based interventions to reach their potential as a key component of chronic disease management, evidence is needed that this technology produces benefits for a sustained period among a diverse population.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of study participants.

References

    1. Bodenheimer T, Chen E, Bennett HD. Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: can the U.S. health care workforce do the job? Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(1):64–74. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.64.28/1/64
    1. Pierson CA, Schumann L, Berner B. A perspective on chronic illness. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Mar;20(3):107–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00303.x.JAAN303
    1. Anderson G. Partnership for Solutions. 2004. Sep, [2012-02-06]. Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care .
    1. US Census Bureau. 2008. [2011-07-18]. National Population Projections: Projections of the Population and Components of Change for the United States: 2010-2050 .
    1. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775–9.jip21004
    1. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(1):75–85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75.28/1/75
    1. Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1–7.
    1. Hill-Briggs F. Problem solving in diabetes self-management: a model of chronic illness self-management behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25(3):182–93.
    1. Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K. Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet. 2004;364(9444):1523–37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17277-2.S0140673604172772
    1. Hibbard JH. Moving toward a more patient-centered health care delivery system. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR133–5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.133.hlthaff.var.133
    1. Holman H, Lorig K. Patient self-management: a key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):239–43. doi: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.002.S0033354904000573
    1. Hibbard JH, Cunningham PJ. Center for Studying Health System Change. 2008. [2011-06-23]. How Engaged are Consumers in Their Health and Health Care, and Why Does it Matter? HSC Research Brief no 8
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stock R, Tusler M. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1443–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00669.x.HESR669
    1. Remmers C, Hibbard J, Mosen DM, Wagenfield M, Hoye RE, Jones C. Is patient activation associated with future health outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients with diabetes? J Ambul Care Manage. 2009;32(4):320–7. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181ba6e77.00004479-200910000-00013
    1. Hibbard JH, Tusler M. Assessing activation stage and employing a "next steps" approach to supporting patient self-management. J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30(1):2–8.00004479-200701000-00002
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: WH Freeman; 1997.
    1. Nolte S, Elsworth GR, Sinclair AJ, Osborne RH. The extent and breadth of benefits from participating in chronic disease self-management courses: a national patient-reported outcomes survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):351–60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.016.S0738-3991(06)00299-0
    1. Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, Sobel D, Remmers C, Bellows J. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30(1):21–9.00004479-200701000-00005
    1. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):1005–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x.HESR269
    1. Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1641–9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1641. 164/15/1641
    1. Marks R, Allegrante JP, Lorig K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part II) Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):148–56. doi: 10.1177/1524839904266792.6/2/148
    1. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10. v8i2e10
    1. Ritterband LM, Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Clifton AD, West RW, Borowitz SM. Internet interventions: in review, in use, and into the future. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2003;34(5):527–34. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.527.
    1. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376. v12i1e4
    1. Barak A, Klein B, Proudfoot JG. Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):4–17. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7.
    1. Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs) J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(6):729–36. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2547. M2547
    1. Kerr C, Murray E, Stevenson F, Gore C, Nazareth I. Internet interventions for long-term conditions: patient and caregiver quality criteria. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e13. v8i3e13
    1. Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1286. v12i2e23
    1. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD004274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub4.
    1. Solomon MR. Information technology to support self-management in chronic care: a systematic review. Dis Manag Health Outcomes. 2008;16(6):391–401.
    1. Jackson CL, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Batts-Turner ML, Gary TL. A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):105–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00310.x.JGI310
    1. Cudney S, Sullivan T, Winters CA, Paul L, Oriet P. Chronically ill rural women: self-identified management problems and solutions. Chronic Illn. 2005 Mar;1(1):49–60.
    1. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VB, Case S. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1275–81. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2153.dc09-2153
    1. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Dost A, Plant K, Laurent DD, McNeil I. The Expert Patients Programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions. Chronic Illn. 2008 Dec;4(4):247–56. doi: 10.1177/1742395308098886.4/4/247
    1. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):964–71. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233678.80203.c1.00005650-200611000-00002
    1. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.HESR438
    1. Insignia Health . Patient Activation Measure (PAM) 13 License Materials. Portland, OR: Insignia Health LLC; 2008.
    1. Mettler M, Kemper DW. Information therapy: health education one person at a time. Health Promot Pract. 2003 Jul;4(3):214–7.
    1. Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003 May 14;289(18):2400–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400. 289/18/2400
    1. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
    1. Polit DF. Data Analysis & Statistics for Nursing Research. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1996.
    1. Francis CF, Feyer AM, Smith BJ. Implementing chronic disease self-management in community settings: lessons from Australian demonstration projects. Aust Health Rev. 2007 Nov;31(4):499–509; discussion 498.ahr_31_4_499
    1. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. The internet-based arthritis self-management program: a one-year randomized trial for patients with arthritis or fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):1009–17. doi: 10.1002/art.23817.
    1. Wangberg SC. An Internet-based diabetes self-care intervention tailored to self-efficacy. Health Educ Res. 2008 Feb;23(1):170–9. doi: 10.1093/her/cym014. cym014
    1. Berman RL, Iris MA, Bode R, Drengenberg C. The effectiveness of an online mind-body intervention for older adults with chronic pain. J Pain. 2009 Jan;10(1):68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.07.006.S1526-5900(08)00685-8
    1. Norusis MJ. SPSS 16.0 Advanced Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2008.
    1. McKay HG, King D, Eakin EG, Seeley JR, Glasgow RE. The diabetes network internet-based physical activity intervention: a randomized pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2001 Aug;24(8):1328–34.
    1. Ross SE, Moore LA, Earnest MA, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004 May 14;6(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.2.e12. v6e12
    1. Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, Nelson CC, Cutter G, Gaglio B, Rahm AK, Whitesides H. Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention to improve diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan;28(1):33–9.28/1/33
    1. Ralston JD, Revere D, Robins LS, Goldberg HI. Patients' experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1159. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1159. 328/7449/1159
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173–82.
    1. Bodenheimer T. Helping patients improve their health-related behaviors: what system changes do we need? Dis Manag. 2005 Oct;8(5):319–30. doi: 10.1089/dis.2005.8.319.
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923. v13i4e126

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する