Effects of a Self-management Course for Adults on Sick-leave (jos)
2017년 12월 7일 업데이트: University of Aarhus
Effects of a Self-management Course for Adults on Sick-leave; Outcomes in Registry Based Measures of Return to Work and Questionnaire Based Measures of Well-being and Quality of Life
The purpose of the current study is to determine the efficacy of a self-management course for workers on sick-leave as an add-on to standard rehabilitation care and follow-up (treatment as usual). Outcomes are registry based measures of return to work, and questionnaire based measures of well-being and quality of life.
We thus, hypothesize that the program will improve workers return to work rates and self-reported/psychological well-being.
연구 개요
상태
완전한
상세 설명
The intervention course is a Danish adaptation of The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP), tailored towards workers on sick-leave. The original program has been developed by The Stanford Patient Education Research Center. The translation and adaptation has been conducted by The Danish Committee for Health Education.
Previous studies have examined the program with respect to specific chronic diseases (e.g., Arthritis), quality of life, well-being and health-care utilization, though non-otherwise specified workers on sick-leave and return work have not been examined before.
The framework of CDSMP is social-cognitive learning theory in which self-efficacy plays a central role.
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
600
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
-
Copenhagen, 덴마크, 2100
- The Danish Comitee for Health Education
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
18년 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Insured persons who receive sick-leave compensation from the Danish State
- Persons who are listed as sick from a job
- Persons who have been categorized as "2 - risk" or "3 - chronic" case by the job-center
- The health problem reflects a chronic or a long-term condition
- The person acknowledges a chronic or long-term condition
- The person wants to work with his or her condition
- The person wants to return to work
- The person volunteers to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Persons who are listed sick for more than 16 weeks
- Persons who are categorized as "1 - easy" by the job-center
- The person does not understand or speak danish
- History or signs of aggressive behavior and violence
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 방지
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Self-management program (SMP)
Participants in the experimental group receive six weekly group-sessions of self-management and patient education; specifically targeting self-management of the return to work process and disease symptoms.
|
A self-management course
다른 이름들:
|
|
간섭 없음: Treatment as usual
Participants in the control-group receive standard rehabilitation care and follow-up in the job-center.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Return to work, duration
기간: Weekly from baseline till 1 year follow-up
|
DREAM-registry (supported by the Danish Ministry of Employment) combined with income/employment information from e-income (supported by the Danish Tax Authorities).
|
Weekly from baseline till 1 year follow-up
|
|
Well-being and Quality of life
기간: up to 5 month follow-up
|
WHO-5 Well-being and WHO Quality of Life/Satisfaction items (Bech, 2012)
|
up to 5 month follow-up
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Common mental disorders
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
The CMDQ questionnaire i based on SCL-90 (Symptom Checklist) and measures somatization, health-anxiety, depression, anxiety and alcohol consumption (Christensen et al., 2005)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Disease self-efficacy scale
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
The University of Washington Self-efficacy scale, 6 item version (Amtmann et al., 2012)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Self-regulation (return to work)
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
Return to work self-regulation questionnaire, measuring internalization of reasons for trying to return to work; adapted from the Treatment Self-regulation Questionnaire (Levesque et al., 2007)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Self-management scale
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
A measure of six cognitive strategies which are taught at the course (Lorig et al., 1996)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Illness Perception questionnaire
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
A measure of 8 items measuring the threat of illness or disease (B-IPQ; Broadbent, Petrie, Main & Weinman, 2006)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Health-care utilization
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
Items that measure utilization of health-care consultation (Lorig et al., 1996)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Medicine consumption
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
Generic items that measure consumption of medicines such as anti-depressants and anxiety medicine, use of pain killers and sleep pills
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Adherence to treatment
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
Adherence to disease specific treatment (inspired by the MMAS-4; Morisky & DiMatteo, 2011)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Common symptoms
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4.5 month follow-up
|
Pain, breath, being tired, sleep quality; measured by VAS scales (Lorig et al., 1996)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4.5 month follow-up
|
|
Decisional Balance (return to work)
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
Generic items that measures how the advantages and disadvantages of returning to work are balanced (Franche & Krause, 2002)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
|
Return to work expectations
기간: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
Generic items that measure expectations about returning to work (Niewenhuiksen, Noordik, van Dijk & van der Klink.
2013; Schultz et al., 20014)
|
Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Martin H Olesen, PhD, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital
- 연구 의자: Jan Høgelund, PhD, VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research
- 수석 연구원: Mimi Y Mehlsen, PhD, University of Aarhus
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
일반 간행물
- Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
- Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
- Amtmann D, Bamer AM, Cook KF, Askew RL, Noonan VK, Brockway JA. University of Washington self-efficacy scale: a new self-efficacy scale for people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;93(10):1757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 7.
- Morisky DE, DiMatteo MR. Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: response to authors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;64(3):255-7; discussion 258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Dec 8. No abstract available.
- Marks R, Allegrante JP, Lorig K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part I). Health Promot Pract. 2005 Jan;6(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/1524839904266790.
- Marks R, Allegrante JP, Lorig K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part II). Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):148-56. doi: 10.1177/1524839904266792.
- Bech, P. Clinical Psychometrics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
- Christensen KS, Fink P, Toft T, Frostholm L, Ornbol E, Olesen F. A brief case-finding questionnaire for common mental disorders: the CMDQ. Fam Pract. 2005 Aug;22(4):448-57. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi025. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
- Bjorner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, Groenvold M. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1001-11. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00092-4.
- Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Dec;12(4):233-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1020270407044.
- Nieuwenhuijsen K, Noordik E, van Dijk FJ, van der Klink JJ. Return to work perceptions and actual return to work in workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun;23(2):290-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9389-6.
- Schultz IZ, Crook J, Meloche GR, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Zuberbier OA, Meloche W. Psychosocial factors predictive of occupational low back disability: towards development of a return-to-work model. Pain. 2004 Jan;107(1-2):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.019.
- Levesque CS, Williams GC, Elliot D, Pickering MA, Bodenhamer B, Finley PJ. Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. Health Educ Res. 2007 Oct;22(5):691-702. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl148. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
- Lorig, K., Stwart, A., Ritter, P., Gonzales, V., Laurent, D., & Lynch, J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1996.
- Lorig K, Laurent DD, Plant K, Krishnan E, Ritter PL. The components of action planning and their associations with behavior and health outcomes. Chronic Illn. 2014 Mar;10(1):50-9. doi: 10.1177/1742395313495572. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
2014년 9월 1일
기본 완료 (실제)
2016년 6월 1일
연구 완료 (실제)
2016년 8월 1일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2014년 5월 8일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2014년 5월 9일
처음 게시됨 (추정)
2014년 5월 12일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2017년 12월 8일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2017년 12월 7일
마지막으로 확인됨
2016년 9월 1일
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .