- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07608874
Comparing Decidual Inclusion vs. Exclusion in Uterine Suture Techniques During Cesarean Section to Improve Scar Thickness and Reduce Isthmocele Risk in Primiparous Women (DISSUC)
The Impact of Decidual Inclusion or Sparing in a Single Unlocked Closure of a Cesarean Uterine Incision: Randomized Controlled Trial
This study compares two ways of closing the uterus during cesarean delivery. In one group, the decidual layer near the uterine cavity is included in the suture. In the other group, this layer is left out. The study will examine whether these two methods differ in how well the uterine scar heals 6 to 9 months after surgery.
Women having an elective cesarean delivery will be randomly assigned to one of the two closure methods. Scar healing will be assessed by ultrasound after delivery. The goal is to determine whether one method is associated with better cesarean scar healing and fewer scar defects.
연구 개요
상태
정황
상세 설명
Cesarean scar defects, also referred to as niches or isthmoceles, are associated with gynecologic symptoms and adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. The effect of uterine closure technique on scar healing remains uncertain, particularly with regard to whether the cavum-near decidual layer should be included in or excluded from the suture during cesarean closure.
This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing two approaches to single-layer, non-locked uterine closure during elective cesarean delivery: decidual inclusion and decidual sparing. In both study groups, all operative steps are standardized except for the handling of the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin.
Participants will be followed 6 to 9 months after cesarean delivery, including blinded ultrasound assessment of cesarean scar healing. The objective is to determine whether decidual inclusion or decidual sparing is associated with differences in postoperative uterine scar healing and cesarean scar defect formation.
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.
- 전화번호: +41564863513
- 이메일: amr.hamza@ksb.ch
연구 연락처 백업
- 이름: Leonhard Schaeffer, Prof.
- 전화번호: +41564863506
- 이메일: leonhard.schaeffer@ksb.ch
연구 장소
-
-
Canton of Aargau
-
Baden, Canton of Aargau, 스위스, 5400
- 모병
- Kantonsspital Baden
-
연락하다:
- Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.
- 전화번호: +41564863513
- 이메일: amr.hamza@ksb.ch
-
연락하다:
- Leonhard Schaeffer, Prof.
- 전화번호: +41564863506
- 이메일: leonhard.schaeffer@ksb.ch
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Singleton, term pregnancy
- Elective cesarean section before labor onset or membrane rupture
- Maternal age >18 years
- Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Placenta previa
- Maternal substance abuse or infection
- Suspected placenta accreta
- Diabetes
- one or more prior cesarean section
- Vulnerable participants (e.g., mental health conditions)
- Emergency cesarean sections
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 방지
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Decidual Inclusion Closure
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo elective cesarean delivery with single-layer, non-locked uterine closure in which the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin is included in the suture.
All other operative steps will be performed according to the standardized study protocol.
|
During the cesarean section, the uterine incision is closed with a single-layered, non-locked suture. In this technique, the decidua (the uterine lining) is included in the closure. This means that the endometrial cells are part of the suture, potentially influencing the healing process of the uterine scar. Goal: The idea is that including the decidua may promote better healing and scar formation, reducing the risk of complications such as isthmocele and improving long-term uterine health. |
|
실험적: Decidual Sparing Closure
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo elective cesarean delivery with single-layer, non-locked uterine closure in which the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin is excluded from the suture.
All other operative steps will be performed according to the standardized study protocol.
|
Procedure: In this technique, the uterine incision is also closed using a single-layered non-locked suture, but the decidua is excluded from the closure. The suture is placed only through the myometrium (muscle layer) of the uterus, leaving the decidua out of the scar tissue. Goal: The intent is to observe if sparing the decidua results in better scar healing and a lower risk of isthmocele formation, as well as fewer long-term complications. |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of participants with a cesarean scar niche measured by ultrasound
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Presence of a cesarean scar niche, defined as a myometrial indentation at the cesarean scar site with a depth of at least 2 mm, assessed by postoperative ultrasound.
The outcome will be reported as the proportion of participants with a niche in each treatment group.
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Residual-to-adjacent myometrial thickness ratio
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Ratio of residual myometrial thickness to adjacent myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound.
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Operative time
기간: Periprocedural
|
Operative time in minutes
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Need for additional sutures for hemostasis
기간: Periprocedural
|
Need for additional hemostatic sutures, yes (how many: __ Number) /no
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Length of hospital stay
기간: Postoperative day 2
|
Length of postoperative hospital stay in days
|
Postoperative day 2
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale
기간: Postoperative day 2
|
Pain intensity assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate worse pain.
|
Postoperative day 2
|
|
Postoperative bleeding
기간: Postoperative day 2
|
Clinically relevant postoperative bleeding, yes/no
|
Postoperative day 2
|
|
Wound infection
기간: Postoperative day 2
|
Postoperative wound infection, yes/no
|
Postoperative day 2
|
|
Postoperative fever
기간: Postoperative day 2
|
Postoperative fever, yes/no
|
Postoperative day 2
|
|
Abnormal uterine bleeding
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Abnormal uterine bleeding reported at follow-up, yes/no
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Dysmenorrhea
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Dysmenorrhea reported at follow-up, yes/no
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Chronic pelvic pain
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Chronic pelvic pain reported at follow-up, yes/no
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Dyspareunia
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Dyspareunia reported at follow-up, yes/no
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Cesarean scar niche length measured by ultrasound in mm
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Length of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Cesarean scar niche depth measured by ultrasound in mm
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Depth of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Cesarean scar niche width measured by ultrasound in mm
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Width of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Residual myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound in mm
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Residual myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound in mm
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
|
Presence of intrauterine fluid on ultrasound
기간: 6 to 9 months post-operation
|
Presence or absence of intrauterine fluid on ultrasound.
|
6 to 9 months post-operation
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof., Kantonsspital Baden
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
키워드
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- StudyKSBHAM001
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .