Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Comparing Decidual Inclusion vs. Exclusion in Uterine Suture Techniques During Cesarean Section to Improve Scar Thickness and Reduce Isthmocele Risk in Primiparous Women (DISSUC)

23 augustus 2026 bijgewerkt door: Amr Sherif Hamza, Kantonsspital Baden

The Impact of Decidual Inclusion or Sparing in a Single Unlocked Closure of a Cesarean Uterine Incision: Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compares two ways of closing the uterus during cesarean delivery. In one group, the decidual layer near the uterine cavity is included in the suture. In the other group, this layer is left out. The study will examine whether these two methods differ in how well the uterine scar heals 6 to 9 months after surgery.

Women having an elective cesarean delivery will be randomly assigned to one of the two closure methods. Scar healing will be assessed by ultrasound after delivery. The goal is to determine whether one method is associated with better cesarean scar healing and fewer scar defects.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Cesarean scar defects, also referred to as niches or isthmoceles, are associated with gynecologic symptoms and adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. The effect of uterine closure technique on scar healing remains uncertain, particularly with regard to whether the cavum-near decidual layer should be included in or excluded from the suture during cesarean closure.

This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing two approaches to single-layer, non-locked uterine closure during elective cesarean delivery: decidual inclusion and decidual sparing. In both study groups, all operative steps are standardized except for the handling of the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin.

Participants will be followed 6 to 9 months after cesarean delivery, including blinded ultrasound assessment of cesarean scar healing. The objective is to determine whether decidual inclusion or decidual sparing is associated with differences in postoperative uterine scar healing and cesarean scar defect formation.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

374

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

  • Naam: Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.
  • Telefoonnummer: +41564863513
  • E-mail: amr.hamza@ksb.ch

Studie Contact Back-up

Studie Locaties

    • Canton of Aargau
      • Baden, Canton of Aargau, Zwitserland, 5400
        • Werving
        • Kantonsspital Baden
        • Contact:
          • Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof.
          • Telefoonnummer: +41564863513
          • E-mail: amr.hamza@ksb.ch
        • Contact:

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singleton, term pregnancy
  • Elective cesarean section before labor onset or membrane rupture
  • Maternal age >18 years
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Placenta previa
  • Maternal substance abuse or infection
  • Suspected placenta accreta
  • Diabetes
  • one or more prior cesarean section
  • Vulnerable participants (e.g., mental health conditions)
  • Emergency cesarean sections

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Preventie
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Dubbele

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Decidual Inclusion Closure
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo elective cesarean delivery with single-layer, non-locked uterine closure in which the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin is included in the suture. All other operative steps will be performed according to the standardized study protocol.

During the cesarean section, the uterine incision is closed with a single-layered, non-locked suture. In this technique, the decidua (the uterine lining) is included in the closure. This means that the endometrial cells are part of the suture, potentially influencing the healing process of the uterine scar.

Goal: The idea is that including the decidua may promote better healing and scar formation, reducing the risk of complications such as isthmocele and improving long-term uterine health.

Experimenteel: Decidual Sparing Closure
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo elective cesarean delivery with single-layer, non-locked uterine closure in which the cavum-near decidual layer at the uterotomy margin is excluded from the suture. All other operative steps will be performed according to the standardized study protocol.

Procedure: In this technique, the uterine incision is also closed using a single-layered non-locked suture, but the decidua is excluded from the closure. The suture is placed only through the myometrium (muscle layer) of the uterus, leaving the decidua out of the scar tissue.

Goal: The intent is to observe if sparing the decidua results in better scar healing and a lower risk of isthmocele formation, as well as fewer long-term complications.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Proportion of participants with a cesarean scar niche measured by ultrasound
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Presence of a cesarean scar niche, defined as a myometrial indentation at the cesarean scar site with a depth of at least 2 mm, assessed by postoperative ultrasound. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of participants with a niche in each treatment group.
6 to 9 months post-operation

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Residual-to-adjacent myometrial thickness ratio
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Ratio of residual myometrial thickness to adjacent myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound.
6 to 9 months post-operation
Operative time
Tijdsspanne: Periprocedural
Operative time in minutes
Periprocedural
Need for additional sutures for hemostasis
Tijdsspanne: Periprocedural
Need for additional hemostatic sutures, yes (how many: __ Number) /no
Periprocedural
Length of hospital stay
Tijdsspanne: Postoperative day 2
Length of postoperative hospital stay in days
Postoperative day 2
Postoperative pain intensity on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale
Tijdsspanne: Postoperative day 2
Pain intensity assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Postoperative day 2
Postoperative bleeding
Tijdsspanne: Postoperative day 2
Clinically relevant postoperative bleeding, yes/no
Postoperative day 2
Wound infection
Tijdsspanne: Postoperative day 2
Postoperative wound infection, yes/no
Postoperative day 2
Postoperative fever
Tijdsspanne: Postoperative day 2
Postoperative fever, yes/no
Postoperative day 2
Abnormal uterine bleeding
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Abnormal uterine bleeding reported at follow-up, yes/no
6 to 9 months post-operation
Dysmenorrhea
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Dysmenorrhea reported at follow-up, yes/no
6 to 9 months post-operation
Chronic pelvic pain
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Chronic pelvic pain reported at follow-up, yes/no
6 to 9 months post-operation
Dyspareunia
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Dyspareunia reported at follow-up, yes/no
6 to 9 months post-operation
Cesarean scar niche length measured by ultrasound in mm
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Length of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
6 to 9 months post-operation
Cesarean scar niche depth measured by ultrasound in mm
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Depth of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
6 to 9 months post-operation
Cesarean scar niche width measured by ultrasound in mm
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Width of cesarean scar niche in mm measured by ultrasound.
6 to 9 months post-operation
Residual myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound in mm
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Residual myometrial thickness measured by ultrasound in mm
6 to 9 months post-operation
Presence of intrauterine fluid on ultrasound
Tijdsspanne: 6 to 9 months post-operation
Presence or absence of intrauterine fluid on ultrasound.
6 to 9 months post-operation

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Amr S. Hamza, Assoc. Prof., Kantonsspital Baden

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

17 juni 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

1 mei 2029

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

30 mei 2029

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

27 augustus 2025

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

19 mei 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

27 mei 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

25 augustus 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

23 augustus 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 augustus 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Beschrijving IPD-plan

De-identified individual participant data will not be shared outside the research team because no external data-sharing process has been approved by the ethics committee or institution. Aggregate study results may be shared through publication or presentation.

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren