Current utility of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in general practice: implications for its use in cardiovascular disease screening

Jane H Davies, Joyce Kenkre, E Mark Williams, Jane H Davies, Joyce Kenkre, E Mark Williams

Abstract

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis and associated with a three to six fold increased risk of death from cardiovascular causes. Furthermore, it is typically asymptomatic and under-diagnosed; this has resulted in escalating calls for the instigation of Primary Care PAD screening via Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) measurement. However, there is limited evidence regarding the feasibility of this and if the requisite core skills and knowledge for such a task already exist within primary care. This study aimed to determine the current utility of ABI measurement in general practices across Wales, with consideration of the implications for its use as a cardiovascular risk screening tool.

Method: A self-reporting questionnaire was distributed to all 478 General Practices within Wales, sent via their responsible Health Boards.

Results: The survey response rate was 20%. ABI measurement is primarily performed by nurses (93%) for the purpose of wound management (90%). It is infrequently (73% < 4 times per month) and often incorrectly used (42% out of compliance with current ABI guidance). Only 52% of general practitioners and 16% of nurses reported that patients with an ABI of ≤ 0.9 require aggressive cardiovascular disease risk factor modification (as recommended by current national and international guidelines).

Conclusion: ABI measurement is an under-utilised and often incorrectly performed procedure in the surveyed general practices. Prior to its potential adoption as a formalised screening tool for cardiovascular disease, there is a need for a robust training programme with standardised methodology in order to optimise accuracy and consistency of results. The significance of a diagnosis of PAD, in terms of associated increased cardiovascular risk and the necessary risk factor modification, needs to be highlighted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of ABI measurement within general practices.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reasons for ABI measurement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagrammatic representation of survey responses.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correct ABI measurement according to origin of training. Clinical Nurse Specialist = Tissue Viability Nurse/Wound Care Practitioner, Specialised Clinic = Local leg ulcer clinic/lymphoedema clinic, Formalised Course = Wound Management Course/Diabetic Diploma.

References

    1. Fowkes FGR, Murray GD, Butcher I, Heald CL, Lee RJ, Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Hirsch AT, Dramaix M, De Backer G, Wautrecht JC, Kornitzer M, Newman AB, Cushman M, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Lee AJ, Price JF, D’Agostino RB, Murabito JM, Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Curb JD, Masaki KH, Rodriguez BL, Dekker JM, Bouter LM, Heine RJ, Nijpels G, Stehouwer CD, Ferrucci L. et al.Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham risk score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(2):197–208.
    1. Heald CL, Fowkes FGR, Murray GD, Price JF. Risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease associated with the ankle-brachial index: systematic review. Atherosclerosis. 2006;189(1):61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.03.011.
    1. Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink ML, Baumgartner I, Clement D, Collet JP, Cremonesi A, De Carlo M, Erbel R, Fowkes FG, Heras M, Kownator S, Minar E, Ostergren J, Poldermans D, Riambau V, Roffi M, Rother J, Sievert H, van Sambeek M, Zeller T, Bax J, Auricchio A, Baumgartner H, Ceconi C, Dean V, Deaton C, Fagard R, Funck-Brentano C, Hasdai D. et al.ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries * The task force on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases of the European society of cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2011;32(22):2851–2906.
    1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FGR, Rutherford RB. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease. Int Angiol. 2007;26(2):81–157.
    1. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease: Full Guideline CG147. London: National Clinical Guidance Centre; 2012.
    1. Bendermacher BLW, Teijink JAW, Willigendael EM, Bartelink M-L, Peters RJG, Langenberg M, Büller HR, Prins MH. Applicability of the ankle-brachial-index measurement as screening device for high cardiovascular risk: an observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012;12:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-59.
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Diagnosis and Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease: A National Clinical Guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2006.
    1. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC, Adams CD, Anderson J, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease) endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. JACC. 2006;47(6):1239–1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.009.
    1. The Society for Vascular Technology of Great Britain and Ireland. Physiological Measurement Specifications: Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) Measurement and Pre and Post Exercise ABPI. .
    1. Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C, Fowkes FG, Hiatt WR, Jönsson B, Lacroix P, Marin B, McDermott MM, Norgren L, Pande RL, Preux PM, Stoffers HE, Treat-Jacobsen D. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2012;126(24):2890–2909. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276fbcb.
    1. Jeelani NU, Braithwaite BD, Tomlin C, MacSweeney ST. Variation of method for measurement of brachial artery pressure significantly affects ankle-brachial pressure index values. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;20(1):25–28. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1141.
    1. Heinemann M, Sellick K, Rickard C, Reynolds P, McGrail M. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008;14(4):296–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00696.x.
    1. Landgraf J, Wishner SH, Kloner RA. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement. Am J Cardiol. 2010;3:386–388.
    1. Smith FB, Lee AJ, Price JF, van Wijk MCW, Fowkes FGR. Changes in ankle brachial index in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects in the general population. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(6):1323–1330. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)01021-8.
    1. Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Ukoumunne OC, Campbell JL. Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9819):905–914. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61710-8.
    1. Kornø M, Eldrup N, Sillesen H. Comparison of ankle-brachial index measured by an automated oscillometric apparatus with that by standard Doppler technique in vascular patients. Eur J Vas Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(5):610–615. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.004.
    1. Nelson MR, Quinn S, Winzenberg TM, Howes F, Shiel L, Reid CM. Ankle-Brachial index determination and peripheral arterial disease diagnosis by an oscillometric blood pressure device in primary care: validation and diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001689. doi.10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001689.
    1. Sinski M, Styczynski G, Szmigielski C. Automated oscillometric measurement of the ankle-brachial index in patients with coronary artery disease. Hypertens Res. 2013;36(1):25–28. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.120.
    1. Takahashi I, Furukawa K, Ohishi W, Takahashi T, Matsumoto M, Fujiwara S. Comparison between oscillometric-and Doppler-ABI in elderly individuals. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:89–94.
    1. Espinola-Klein C, Rupprecht HJ, Bickel C, Lackner K, Savvidis S, Messow CM, Munzel T, Blankenberg S. Different calculations of ankle-brachial index and their impact on cardiovascular risk prediction. Circulation. 2008;118(9):961–967. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.763227.
    1. Allison MA, Aboyans V, Granston T, McDermott MM, Kamineni A, Ni H, Criqui MH. The relevance of different methods of calculating the ankle-brachial index: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(3):368–376. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp382.
    1. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Ikeda Y, Mas J-L, Goto S, Liau C-S, Richard AJ, Röther J, Wilson PW. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2006;295(2):180–189. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.180.
    1. Al-Qaisi M, Nott DM, King DH, Kaddoura S. Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI): an update for practitioners. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:833–841.
    1. Bonevski B, Magin P, Horton G, Foster M, Girgis A. Response rates in GP surveys–trialling two recruitment strategies. Aust Fam Physician. 2011;40(6):427–430.
    1. Sihlangu D, Bliss J. Resting Doppler ankle brachial pressure index measurement: a literature review. Br J Community Nurs. 2012;17(7):318.
    1. Kaiser V, Kester AD, Stoffers HE, Kitslaar PJ, Knottnerus JA. The influence of experience on the reproducibility of the ankle-brachial systolic pressure ratio in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;18(1):25–29. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0843.
    1. Mätzke S, Franckena M, Albäck A, Railo M, Lepäntalo M. Ankle brachial index measurements in critical leg ischaemia–the influence of experience on reproducibility. Scand J Surg. 2003;92(2):144–147.
    1. Mohler ER III, Treat-Jacobson D, Reilly MP, Cunningham KE, Miani M, Criqui MH, Hiatt WR, Hirsch AT. Utility and barriers to performance of the ankle-brachial index in primary care practice. Vasc Med. 2004;9(4):253–260. doi: 10.1191/1358863x04vm559oa.
    1. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Quality and Outcomes Framework, Menu of Indicators. .
    1. Moyer VA. Screening for peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular disease risk assessment with the ankle-brachial index in adults: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(5):342–348. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-5-201309030-00008.
    1. Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(10):1424–1430.
    1. Britt H, Miller G, Bayram C. The quality of data on general practice–a discussion of BEACH reliability and validity. Aust Fam Physician. 2007;36(1-2):36–40.
    1. Nicolaï SP, Kruidenier LM, Rouwet EV, Bartelink ML, Prins MH, Teijink JA. Ankle brachial index measurement in primary care: are we doing it right? Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(563):422–427. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420932.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다