Contrasting a Mobile App With a Conversational Chatbot for Reducing Alcohol Consumption: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Patrick Dulin, Robyn Mertz, Alexandra Edwards, Diane King, Patrick Dulin, Robyn Mertz, Alexandra Edwards, Diane King

Abstract

Background: Mobile apps have shown considerable promise for reducing alcohol consumption among problem drinkers, but like many mobile health apps, they frequently report low utilization, which is an important limitation, as research suggests that effectiveness is related to higher utilization. Interactive chatbots have the ability to provide a conversational interface with users and may be more engaging and result in higher utilization and effectiveness, but there is limited research into this possibility.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a chatbot alcohol intervention based on an empirically supported app (Step Away) for reducing drinking and to conduct a pilot trial of the 2 interventions. Included participants met the criteria for hazardous drinking and were interested in reducing alcohol consumption. The study assessed utilization patterns and alcohol outcomes across the 2 technology conditions, and a waitlist control group.

Methods: Participants were recruited using Facebook advertisements. Those who met the criteria for hazardous consumption and expressed an interest in changing their drinking habits were randomly assigned to three conditions: the Step Away app, Step Away chatbot, and waitlist control condition. Participants were assessed on the web using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Adapted for Use in the United States, Readiness to Change Questionnaire, Short Inventory of Problems-Revised, and Timeline Followback at baseline and at 12 weeks follow-up.

Results: A total of 150 participants who completed the baseline and follow-up assessments were included in the final analysis. ANOVA results indicated that participants in the 3 conditions changed their drinking from baseline to follow-up, with large effect sizes noted (ie, η2=0.34 for change in drinks per day across conditions). However, the differences between groups were not significant across the alcohol outcome variables. The only significant difference between conditions was in the readiness to change variable, with the bot group showing the greatest improvement in readiness (F2,147=5.6; P=.004; η2=0.07). The results suggested that the app group used the app for a longer duration (mean 50.71, SD 49.02 days) than the bot group (mean 27.16, SD 30.54 days; P=.02). Use of the interventions was shown to predict reduced drinking in a multiple regression analysis (β=.25, 95% CI 0.00-0.01; P=.04).

Conclusions: Results indicated that all groups in this study reduced their drinking considerably from baseline to the 12-week follow-up, but no differences were found in the alcohol outcome variables between the groups, possibly because of a combination of small sample size and methodological issues. The app group reported greater use and slightly higher usability scores than the bot group, but the bot group demonstrated improved readiness to change scores over the app group. The strengths and limitations of the app and bot interventions as well as directions for future research are discussed.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04447794; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04447794.

Keywords: alcohol; brief intervention; chatbot; effectiveness; hazardous drinking; mobile phone; smartphone app; utilization.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: PD has a financial interest in the company that owns the Step Away app and bot. He did not participate in data collection and analysis in this study.

©Patrick Dulin, Robyn Mertz, Alexandra Edwards, Diane King. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 16.05.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of days with hazardous drinking from baseline to follow-up.

References

    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1238–45. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.291/10/1238
    1. Alcohol and public health: alcohol-related disease impact (ARDI): annual average for United States 2011-2015: alcohol-attributable deaths due to excessive alcohol use, all ages. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. [2022-03-23]. .
    1. White AM, Castle IP, Hingson RW, Powell PA. Using death certificates to explore changes in alcohol-related mortality in the United States, 1999 to 2017. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jan;44(1):178–87. doi: 10.1111/acer.14239.
    1. Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, Orleans T, Klein J, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Apr 06;140(7):557–68. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-7-200404060-00017. 140/7/557
    1. Miller WR, Brown J, Simpson TL, Handmaker NS, Bien TH, Luckie LF, Montgomery HA, Hester RK, Tonigan JS. What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In: Hester RK, Miller WR, editors. Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: effective alternatives. 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Allyn & Bacon; 1995. pp. 12–24.
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration . Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2019 national survey on drug use and health (HHS Publication No. PEP20-07-01-001, NSDUH Series H-55) Rockville, MD, USA: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2020.
    1. Vernon ML. A review of computer-based alcohol problem services designed for the general public. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Apr;38(3):203–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.11.001. S0740-5472(09)00184-6
    1. Choo EK, Ranney ML, Wong Z, Mello MJ. Attitudes toward technology-based health information among adult emergency department patients with drug or alcohol misuse. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Dec;43(4):397–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.09.005. S0740-5472(12)00380-7
    1. Lieberman DZ, Huang SW. A technological approach to reaching a hidden population of problem drinkers. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Mar;59(3):297–303. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.3.297.59/3/297
    1. Cunningham JA. Comparison of two internet-based interventions for problem drinkers: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Aug 01;14(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2090. v14i4e107
    1. Cunningham JA, Wild TC, Cordingley J, van Mierlo T, Humphreys K. A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention for alcohol abusers. Addiction. 2009 Dec;104(12):2023–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02726.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02726.x.ADD2726
    1. Hester RK, Delaney HD, Campbell W. and moderation management: outcomes of a randomized clinical trial with non-dependent problem drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Apr;79(2):215–24. doi: 10.1037/a0022487. 2011-03047-001
    1. Riper H, Spek V, Boon B, Conijn B, Kramer J, Martin-Abello K, Smit F. Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jun 30;13(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1691. v13i2e42
    1. Hester RK, Squires DD, Delaney HD. The Drinker's Check-up: 12-month outcomes of a controlled clinical trial of a stand-alone software program for problem drinkers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Mar;28(2):159–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.12.002.S0740-5472(04)00156-4
    1. Barak A, Hen L, Boniel-Nissim M, Shapira N. A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. J Technol Hum Serv. 2008;26(2-4):109–60. doi: 10.1080/15228830802094429. doi: 10.1080/15228830802094429.
    1. Newman MG, Szkodny LE, Llera SJ, Przeworski A. A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.008.S0272-7358(10)00166-2
    1. Gainsbury S, Blaszczynski A. A systematic review of Internet-based therapy for the treatment of addictions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;31(3):490–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.007.S0272-7358(10)00177-7
    1. Postel MG, de Jong CA, de Haan HA. Does e-therapy for problem drinking reach hidden populations? Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;162(12):2393. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2393.162/12/2393
    1. Lin LA, Casteel D, Shigekawa E, Weyrich MS, Roby DH, McMenamin SB. Telemedicine-delivered treatment interventions for substance use disorders: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Jun;101:38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.007.S0740-5472(18)30428-8
    1. McInnes DK, Li AE, Hogan TP. Opportunities for engaging low-income, vulnerable populations in health care: a systematic review of homeless persons' access to and use of information technologies. Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103 Suppl 2:e11–24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301623.
    1. Burner E, Zhang M, Terp S, Ford Bench K, Lee J, Lam CN, Torres JR, Menchine M, Arora S. Feasibility and acceptability of a text message-based intervention to reduce overuse of alcohol in emergency department patients: controlled proof-of-concept trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 04;8(6):e17557. doi: 10.2196/17557. v8i6e17557
    1. Wallhed Finn S, Bakshi AS, Andréasson S. Alcohol consumption, dependence, and treatment barriers: perceptions among nontreatment seekers with alcohol dependence. Subst Use Misuse. 2014 May;49(6):762–9. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.891616.
    1. McCrady BS, Epstein EE, Fokas KF. Treatment interventions for women with alcohol use disorder. Alcohol Res. 2020;40(2):08. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v40.2.08. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v40.2.08.arcr-40-2-1
    1. Alvanzo AA, Storr CL, Mojtabai R, Green KM, Pacek LR, La Flair LN, Cullen BA, Crum RM. Gender and race/ethnicity differences for initiation of alcohol-related service use among persons with alcohol dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jul 01;140:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.010. S0376-8716(14)00786-8
    1. Gilbert PA, Pro G, Zemore SE, Mulia N, Brown G. Gender differences in use of alcohol treatment services and reasons for nonuse in a national sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Apr;43(4):722–31. doi: 10.1111/acer.13965.
    1. Verissimo AD, Grella CE. Influence of gender and race/ethnicity on perceived barriers to help-seeking for alcohol or drug problems. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Apr;75:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.12.013. S0740-5472(16)30307-5
    1. Heron KE, Smyth JM. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):1–39. doi: 10.1348/135910709X466063. bjhp696
    1. Burns MN, Begale M, Duffecy J, Gergle D, Karr CJ, Giangrande E, Mohr DC. Harnessing context sensing to develop a mobile intervention for depression. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 12;13(3):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1838. v13i3e55
    1. Waters AJ, Schoenmakers TM, Snelleman M, Szeto EH, Franken IH, Hendriks VM, van de Mheen D. Affect, motivation, temptation, and drinking among alcohol-dependent outpatients trying to maintain abstinence: an Ecological Momentary Assessment study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 01;206:107626. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107626.S0376-8716(19)30403-X
    1. Bell L, Garnett C, Qian T, Perski O, Williamson E, Potts HW. Engagement with a behavior change app for alcohol reduction: data visualization for longitudinal observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 11;22(12):e23369. doi: 10.2196/23369. v22i12e23369
    1. Starcke K, Antons S, Trotzke P, Brand M. Cue-reactivity in behavioral addictions: a meta-analysis and methodological considerations. J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 01;7(2):227–38. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.39.
    1. Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;162(8):1403–13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1403.162/8/1403
    1. Anderson M. Mobile technology and home broadband 2019. Pew Research Center. 2019. [2022-03-27].
    1. Milne-Ives M, Lam C, De Cock C, Van Velthoven MH, Meinert E. Mobile apps for health behavior change in physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, and mental health: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 18;8(3):e17046. doi: 10.2196/17046. v8i3e17046
    1. Baumel A, Kane JM. Examining predictors of real-world user engagement with self-guided eHealth interventions: analysis of mobile apps and websites using a novel dataset. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 14;20(12):e11491. doi: 10.2196/11491. v20i12e11491
    1. Ly KH, Ly AM, Andersson G. A fully automated conversational agent for promoting mental well-being: a pilot RCT using mixed methods. Internet Interv. 2017 Dec;10:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.10.002. S2214-7829(17)30091-X
    1. Spaulding EM, Marvel FA, Piasecki RJ, Martin SS, Allen JK. User engagement with smartphone apps and cardiovascular disease risk factor outcomes: systematic review. JMIR Cardio. 2021 Feb 03;5(1):e18834. doi: 10.2196/18834. v5i1e18834
    1. Short CE, DeSmet A, Woods C, Williams SL, Maher C, Middelweerd A, Müller AM, Wark PA, Vandelanotte C, Poppe L, Hingle MD, Crutzen R. Measuring engagement in eHealth and mHealth behavior change interventions: viewpoint of methodologies. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 16;20(11):e292. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9397. v20i11e292
    1. Dulin PL, Gonzalez VM, Campbell K. Results of a pilot test of a self-administered smartphone-based treatment system for alcohol use disorders: usability and early outcomes. Subst Abus. 2014;35(2):168–75. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2013.821437.
    1. Miller WR. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1999. [2022-03-27]. Enhancing motivation for change in substance abuse treatment: TIP Series 35. .
    1. Marlatt GA, Donovan DM. Relapse prevention: maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. 2nd edition. New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press; 2005.
    1. Meyers RJ, Villanueva M, Smith JE. The community reinforcement approach: history and new directions. J Cogn Psychother. 2005;19(3):247–60. doi: 10.1891/jcop.2005.19.3.247.
    1. Malte CA, Dulin PL, Baer JS, Fortney JC, Danner AN, Lott AM, Hawkins EJ. Usability and acceptability of a mobile app for the self-management of alcohol misuse among veterans (Step Away): pilot cohort study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 08;9(4):e25927. doi: 10.2196/25927. v9i4e25927
    1. Furness D. The chatbot will see you now: AI may play doctor in the future of healthcare. Digital Trends. 2016. [2022-03-27].
    1. Taylor H. How China's biggest search engine aims to fix a huge crisis in health care: a bot. CNBC. 2016. [2022-03-27]. .
    1. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
    1. Reinert DF, Allen JP. The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Feb;31(2):185–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x.ACER295
    1. Miller WR, Tonigan JS, Longabaugh R. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1995. [2022-03-27]. The drinker inventory of consequences (DrInC): an instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse: test manual. .
    1. Kiluk BD, Dreifuss JA, Weiss RD, Morgenstern J, Carroll KM. The short inventory of problems - revised (SIP-R): psychometric properties within a large, diverse sample of substance use disorder treatment seekers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):307–14. doi: 10.1037/a0028445. 2012-13669-001
    1. Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, Ivey MA, Habing B, Lynch KG. Reliability and validity of the alcohol short index of problems and a newly constructed drug short index of problems. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Mar;70(2):304–7. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.304.
    1. Feinn R, Tennen H, Kranzler HR. Psychometric properties of the short index of problems as a measure of recent alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Sep;27(9):1436–41. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen JP, editors. Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biological methods. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press; 1992. pp. 41–72.
    1. Dulin PL, Alvarado CE, Fitterling JM, Gonzalez VM. Comparisons of alcohol consumption by time-line follow back vs. smartphone-based daily interviews. Addict Res Theory. 2017;25(3):195–200. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2016.1239081.
    1. Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, Hall W. Development of a short 'readiness to change' questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. Br J Addict. 1992 May;87(5):743–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02720.x.
    1. Brooke J. SUS: a 'quickdirty' usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, McClelland IL, Weerdmeester B, editors. Usability evaluation in industry. London, UK: CRC Press; 1996. pp. 189–94.
    1. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008 Jul 30;24(6):574–94. doi: 10.1080/10447310802205776.
    1. Planning and implementing screening and brief intervention for risky alcohol use: a step-by-step guide for primary care practices. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. [2022-03-27]. .
    1. Meier E, Miller MB, Lombardi N, Leffingwell T. Assessment reactivity: a randomized controlled trial of alcohol-specific measures on alcohol-related behaviors. Addict Behav. 2017 Apr;67:44–8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.025. S0306-4603(16)30415-4
    1. Blonigen DM, Harris-Olenak B, Kuhn E, Timko C, Humphreys K, Smith JS, Dulin P. Using peers to increase veterans' engagement in a smartphone application for unhealthy alcohol use: a pilot study of acceptability and utility. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Nov;35(7):829–39. doi: 10.1037/adb0000598.2020-46422-001
    1. Gonzalez VM, Dulin PL. Comparison of a smartphone app for alcohol use disorders with an Internet-based intervention plus bibliotherapy: a pilot study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Apr;83(2):335–45. doi: 10.1037/a0038620. 2015-02676-001

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다