A case-control study of osteopathic palpatory findings in type 2 diabetes mellitus

John C Licciardone, Kimberly G Fulda, Scott T Stoll, Russell G Gamber, A Clifton Cage, John C Licciardone, Kimberly G Fulda, Scott T Stoll, Russell G Gamber, A Clifton Cage

Abstract

Background: Although type 2 diabetes mellitus is often managed by osteopathic physicians, osteopathic palpatory findings in this disease have not been adequately studied.

Methods: A case-control study was used to measure the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus and a series of 30 osteopathic palpatory findings. The latter included skin changes, trophic changes, tissue changes, tenderness, and immobility at spinal segmental levels T5-T7, T8-T10, and T11-L2 bilaterally. Logistic regression models that adjusted for age, sex, and comorbid conditions were used to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between type 2 diabetes mellitus and each of these findings.

Results and discussion: A total of 92 subjects were included in the study. After controlling for age, sex, hypertension, and clinical depression, the only significant finding was an association between type 2 diabetes mellitus and tissue changes at T11-L2 on the right side (OR, 5.54; 95% CI, 1.76-17.47; P = .003). Subgroup analyses of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension demonstrated significant associations with tissue changes at T11-L2 bilaterally (OR, 27.38; 95% CI, 1.75-428; P = .02 for the left side and OR, 24.00; 95% CI, 1.51-382; P = .02 for the right side). Among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, there was also a strong diabetes mellitus duration effect for tissue changes at T11-L2 bilaterally (OR, 12.00; 95% CI, 1.02-141; P = .05 for short duration vs. OR, 32.00; 95% CI, 2.29-448; P = .01 for long duration on the left side; and OR, 17.33; 95% CI, 1.39-217; P = .03 for short duration vs. OR, 32.00; 95% CI, 2.29-448; P = .01 for long duration on the right side).

Conclusion: The only consistent finding in this study was an association between type 2 diabetes mellitus and tissue changes at T11-L2 on the right side. Potential explanations for this finding include reflex viscerosomatic changes directly related to the progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus, a spurious association attributable to confounding visceral diseases, or a chance observation unrelated to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Larger prospective studies are needed to better study osteopathic palpatory findings in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radar plots of proportional agreement and kappa for osteopathic palpatory findings according to element of somatic dysfunction, spinal segmental level, and laterality. The proportional agreement is presented in yellow and kappa in gray. The red circle represents zero on each radial scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Columnar graphs of osteopathic palpatory findings according to element of somatic dysfunction, spinal segmental level, and laterality. The columns represent the proportion of subjects with a positive osteopathic palpatory finding.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2003. Revised edition. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2004.
    1. Segal KR. Type 2 diabetes and disease management: exploring the connections. Dis Manag. 2004;7:S11–22. doi: 10.1089/1093507042317125.
    1. American Diabetes Association Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917–932.
    1. Beal MC. Viscerosomatic reflexes: a review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1985;85:786–801.
    1. Bandeen SG. Diabetes: report covering twenty-five years research on stimulation of pancreas, blood chemical changes. Osteopath Prof. 1949;17:11–15. 38, 40, 42, 44, 46–47.
    1. American Osteopathic Association . 2000/01 Yearbook and Directory of Osteopathic Physicians. 91. Chicago, IL; 2000.
    1. Kuchera WA, Kuchera ML. Osteopathic Principles in Practice. 2nd edition, revised. Kirksville, MO:Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine; 1992.
    1. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
    1. Ritz E, Stefanski A. Diabetic nephropathy in type II diabetes. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;27:167–194.
    1. Mazzucco G, Bertani T, Fortunato M, Bernardi M, Leutner M, Boldorini R, Monga G. Different patterns of renal damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicentric study on 393 biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:713–720.
    1. Siraj ES, Myles J, Nurko S, Mehta AE, Reddy SSK. Development of diabetes mellitus several years after manifestation of diabetic nephropathy: case report and review of literature. Endocr Pract. 2003;9:301–306.
    1. Kuchera ML, McPartland JM. Myofascial trigger points as somatic dysfunction. In: Ward RC, editor. Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. pp. 1034–1050.
    1. Kappler RE. A comparison of structural examination findings obtained by experienced physician examiners and student examiners on hospital patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1980;79:468–471.
    1. Beal MC, Patriquin DA. Interexaminer agreement on palpatory diagnosis and patient self-assessment of disability: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1995;95:97–106.
    1. Orwin RG. Evaluating coding decisions. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editor. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994. pp. 139–162.
    1. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co; 1985.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다