Critical Limb Ischemia Induces Remodeling of Skeletal Muscle Motor Unit, Myonuclear-, and Mitochondrial-Domains

Mahir Mohiuddin, Nan Hee Lee, June Young Moon, Woojin M Han, Shannon E Anderson, Jeongmoon J Choi, Eunjung Shin, Shadi A Nakhai, Thu Tran, Berna Aliya, Do Young Kim, Aimee Gerold, Laura M Hansen, W Robert Taylor, Young C Jang, Mahir Mohiuddin, Nan Hee Lee, June Young Moon, Woojin M Han, Shannon E Anderson, Jeongmoon J Choi, Eunjung Shin, Shadi A Nakhai, Thu Tran, Berna Aliya, Do Young Kim, Aimee Gerold, Laura M Hansen, W Robert Taylor, Young C Jang

Abstract

Critical limb ischemia, the most severe form of peripheral artery disease, leads to extensive damage and alterations to skeletal muscle homeostasis. Although recent research has investigated the tissue-specific responses to ischemia, the role of the muscle stem cell in the regeneration of its niche components within skeletal muscle has been limited. To elucidate the regenerative mechanism of the muscle stem cell in response to ischemic insults, we explored cellular interactions between the vasculature, neural network, and muscle fiber within the muscle stem cell niche. Using a surgical murine hindlimb ischemia model, we first discovered a significant increase in subsynaptic nuclei and remodeling of the neuromuscular junction following ischemia-induced denervation. In addition, ischemic injury causes significant alterations to the myofiber through a muscle stem cell-mediated accumulation of total myonuclei and a concomitant decrease in myonuclear domain size, possibly to enhance the transcriptional and translation output and restore muscle mass. Results also revealed an accumulation of total mitochondrial content per myonucleus in ischemic myofibers to compensate for impaired mitochondrial function and high turnover rate. Taken together, the findings from this study suggest that the muscle stem cell plays a role in motor neuron reinnervation, myonuclear accretion, and mitochondrial biogenesis for skeletal muscle regeneration following ischemic injury.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characterization of CLI mouse model and skeletal muscle regeneration. (a) LDPI of ventral mouse hindlimbs 1 hour, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. Control leg on left, ischemic leg on right. Scale bar represents blood flow perfusion by color. (b) H&E staining of TA cross-sections in control, and 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. (c) Immunohistochemistry of TA cross-sections in control, and 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. Dystrophin pseudo-colored in red, eMHC in green, nuclei in blue. Scale bars on cross-sections represent 50 µm. (d) Total number of eMHC+ fibers within a 0.33 mm2 field of view for control, 7 days, 14 days, and 56 days following CLI. (e) Percentage of centrally nucleated fibers in control, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following surgery. (f) Mean cross-sectional fiber area of 4 random 0.33 mm2 fields of view of the TA using dystrophin in control, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 compared to control for all figures. (g) Mean cross-sectional area of centrally nucleated myofibers of the TA. n = 3, ****p < 0.0001 compared to control. ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 compared to day 56.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Remodeling of the motor unit. (a) NMJ in EDL 1 hour (day 0), 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. Nuclei pseudo-colored in blue, α-bungarotoxin (for acetylcholine receptor-α subunit) in red, Thy1 (for motor neuron axon terminal) in green. Maximum intensity projection was performed on images from confocal microscopy. (b) NMJ on single myofibers from TA from 1 hour (day 0), 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. Nuclei pseudo-colored in blue, acetylcholine receptor-α subunit in red, actin in green. (c) Representative images of normal, partially denervated, and completely denervated NMJ. Acetylcholine receptor-α subunit (α-bungarotoxin) pseudo-colored in red, Thy1 in green. (d) Percentages of normal, partially denervated, and completely denervated NMJ in EDL (at least 20 NMJs per sample) 1 hour (day 0), 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. (e) Number of subsynaptic myonuclei within each NMJ (at least 15 NMJ’s per sample) and their associated NMJ areas of single myofibers from the TA. All scale bars represent 50 µm. n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 compared to day 0 for all figures.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in myonuclear domain following CLI. (a) Z-stack confocal imaging of single myofibers from TA of control, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days following CLI. Nuclei pseudo-colored in light blue, actin in red. (b) Number of myonuclei per 500 µm of myofiber (at least 20 fibers per sample) at various timepoints (n = 6). (c) Myonuclear domain of at least 20 single myofibers per sample over 500 µm at various timepoints, calculated as myofiber volume divided by number of myonuclei. Myofiber volume was approximated as the volume of a cylinder using the average radius along a 500 µm length of myofiber (n = 6). (d) Total isolated RNA levels in gastrocnemius homogenate normalized to muscle mass. (e) Z-stack confocal imaging of single myofibers from TA of Pax7-TdTomato mice control, 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days following CLI. Nuclei pseudo-colored in blue, Pax7 in red, actin in green. All scale bars represent 100 µm. Maximum intensity projection performed on all z-stack images (n = 3). (f) MuSC frequency of at least 20 single myofibers per sample at various timepoints reported as percentage of Pax7+ cells out of total myonuclei (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 compared to control for all figures. (g) Myofiber volume, myonuclei number, myonuclear domain, and MuSC frequency as a ratio of ischemic to control myofiber. Dashed line represents a ratio of 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in mitochondrial domain following CLI. (a) Confocal imaging of single myofibers from TA of mitoDendra2 mice control, 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days following CLI using constant gain and laser power. Nuclei pseudo-colored in blue, mitochondria in white. Red arrowheads indicate areas of high mitochondrial density. (b) Confocal imaging of single myofibers from TA of mtKeima mice in GFP channel to delineate healthy mitochondria. (c) Confocal imaging of single myofibers from TA of mtKeima mice in dsRed channel to delineate Mitophagy. (d) Merged images of mtKeima myofibers in green (b) and red (c) channels to portray relative levels of healthy to autophagic mitochondria. Scale bars represent 50 µm. (e) Mitochondrial domain of at least 20 single myofibers per sample at various timepoints calculated as relative integrated fluorescent density of total mitochondria in mitoDendra2 mice divided by the number of myonuclei (n = 3). (f) Relative mtDNA copy number quantified as expression of mitochondrial-encoded mt-Co1 normalized by expression of nuclear-encoded Sdha (n = 3). (g) Relative mitochondrial content of healthy and autophagic mitochondria of at least 20 myofibers per sample in mtKeima mice calculated as mean fluorescent intensity of each fiber (n = 3). (h) Red to green ratio of myofibers in mtKeima mice to represent mitochondrial autophagy to healthy mitochondria (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to control for all figures.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Altered mitochondrial membrane protein expression after CLI. (a) Quantified Western blot analyses 7, 14, and 28 days following CLI for the long isoform of OPA1 protein expression (n = 3). (b) Quantified Western blot analyses 7, 14, and 28 days following CLI for the short isoform of OPA1 protein expression (n = 3). (c) Relative gene expression of Opa17, 14, and 28 days following critical limb ischemia (n = 3). (d) Quantified Western blot analyses 7, 14, and 28 days following CLI for prohibitin 2 protein expression (n = 3). (e) Relative gene expression of prohibitin 2 7, 14, and 28 days following critical limb ischemia (n = 3). (f) Relative gene expression of prohibitin 17, 14, and 28 days following critical limb ischemia (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to control for all figures. Black bars represent control and gray bars represent hindlimb ischemia for all figures.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Impaired mitochondrial function following CLI. (a) Basal (state 1 respiration) oxygen consumption rate and mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production from hindlimb skeletal muscles 7 days following CLI using Oroboros Oxygraph-2k (n = 3). (b) Quantified Western blot analyses 7, 14, and 28 days following CLI for mitochondrial ETC complex I (NDUFB8-subunit), complex II (SDHB-subunit), complex III (UQCRC2-subunit), complex IV (MTCO1-subunit), and complex V (ATP5A-subunit) relative protein expression (n = 3). (c) Quantified Western blot analyses 14 days following CLI for SOD2 (n = 3), SOD1 (n = 6), and myoglobin (n = 6) protein expression. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 compared to control for all figures.

References

    1. Swaminathan A, Vemulapalli S, Patel MR, Jones WS. Lower extremity amputation in peripheral artery disease: improving patient outcomes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014;10:417–424. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S50588.
    1. Olea FD, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression does not enhance adipose stromal cell-induced protection on muscle damage in critical limb ischemia. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2015;35:184–188. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.114.304348.
    1. Cooke JP, Losordo DW. Modulating the Vascular Response to Limb Ischemia Angiogenic and Cell Therapies. Circulation research. 2015;116:1561–1578. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303565.
    1. Borselli C, et al. Functional muscle regeneration with combined delivery of angiogenesis and myogenesis factors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:3287–3292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903875106.
    1. Brooks PC. Role of integrins in angiogenesis. European Journal of Cancer. 1996;32:2423–2429. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00381-4.
    1. Kilarski Witold W, Samolov Branka, Petersson Ludvig, Kvanta Anders, Gerwins Pär. Biomechanical regulation of blood vessel growth during tissue vascularization. Nature Medicine. 2009;15(6):657–664. doi: 10.1038/nm.1985.
    1. Charge SB, Rudnicki MA. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiological reviews. 2004;84:209–238. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00019.2003.
    1. Hart CA, Tsui J, Khanna A, Abraham DJ, Baker DM. Stem cells of the lower limb: their role and potential in management of critical limb ischemia. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) 2013;238:1118–1126. doi: 10.1177/1535370213503275.
    1. Yin H, Price F, Rudnicki MA. Satellite Cells and the Muscle Stem Cell Niche. Physiological Reviews. 2013;93:23–67. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2011.
    1. Verma M, et al. Muscle Satellite Cell Cross-Talk with a Vascular Niche Maintains Quiescence via VEGF and Notch Signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:530–543.e539. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.09.007.
    1. Mandal S, Lindgren AG, Srivastava AS, Clark AT, Banerjee U. Mitochondrial function controls proliferation and early differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2011;29:486–495. doi: 10.1002/stem.590.
    1. Richter C, et al. Oxidants in mitochondria: from physiology to diseases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 1995;1271:67–74. doi: 10.1016/0925-4439(95)00012-S.
    1. Latroche C, et al. Skeletal Muscle Microvasculature: A Highly Dynamic Lifeline. Physiology. 2015;30:417–427. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00026.2015.
    1. Sciorati C, Rigamonti E, Manfredi AA, Rovere-Querini P. Cell death, clearance and immunity in the skeletal muscle. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2016;23:927–937. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.171.
    1. Vignaud A, et al. Impaired Skeletal Muscle Repair after Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2010;2010:724914. doi: 10.1155/2010/724914.
    1. Yang X, et al. Patterning of Muscle Acetylcholine Receptor Gene Expression in the Absence of Motor Innervation. Neuron. 2001;30:399–410. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00287-2.
    1. Rowan SL, et al. Denervation Causes Fiber Atrophy and Myosin Heavy Chain Co-Expression in Senescent Skeletal Muscle. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e29082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029082.
    1. Holloszy JO, Larsson L. Motor Units: Remodeling in Aged. Animals. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 1995;50A:91–95. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50A.Special_Issue.91.
    1. Martin P, Lewis J. Origins of the neurovascular bundle: interactions between developing nerves and blood vessels in embryonic chick skin. The International journal of developmental biology. 1989;33:379–387.
    1. Eichmann A, Makinen T, Alitalo K. Neural guidance molecules regulate vascular remodeling and vessel navigation. Genes & development. 2005;19:1013–1021. doi: 10.1101/gad.1305405.
    1. Cattin A-L, et al. Macrophage-Induced Blood Vessels Guide Schwann Cell-Mediated Regeneration of Peripheral Nerves. Cell. 2015;162:1127–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.021.
    1. Shvartsman D, et al. Sustained Delivery of VEGF Maintains Innervation and Promotes Reperfusion in Ischemic Skeletal Muscles Via NGF/GDNF Signaling. Molecular Therapy. 2014;22:1243–1253. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.76.
    1. Wilson RJ, et al. Mitochondrial protein S-nitrosation protects against ischemia reperfusion-induced denervation at neuromuscular junction in skeletal muscle. Free radical biology & medicine. 2018;117:180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.02.006.
    1. Schultz E. Changes in the satellite cells of growing muscle following denervation. The Anatomical record. 1978;190:299–311. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091900212.
    1. Liu, W., Wei-LaPierre, L., Klose, A., Dirksen, R. T. & Chakkalakal, J. V. Inducible depletion of adult skeletal muscle stem cells impairs the regeneration of neuromuscular junctions. Elife4, 10.7554/eLife.09221 (2015).
    1. Alnaes E, Rahamimoff R. On the role of mitochondria in transmitter release from motor nerve terminals. The Journal of physiology. 1975;248:285–306. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010974.
    1. Verstreken P, et al. Synaptic mitochondria are critical for mobilization of reserve pool vesicles at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Neuron. 2005;47:365–378. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.018.
    1. Karsch-Mizrachi I, Travis M, Blau H, Leinwand LA. Expression and DNA sequence analysis of a human embryonic skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain gene. Nucleic acids research. 1989;17:6167–6179. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.15.6167.
    1. Mahdy MAA, Lei HY, Wakamatsu J-I, Hosaka YZ, Nishimura T. Comparative study of muscle regeneration following cardiotoxin and glycerol injury. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2015;202:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.07.002.
    1. Hardy D, et al. Comparative Study of Injury Models for Studying Muscle Regeneration in Mice. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147198.
    1. Tintignac LA, Brenner H-R, Rüegg MA. Mechanisms Regulating Neuromuscular Junction Development and Function and Causes of Muscle Wasting. Physiological Reviews. 2015;95:809–852. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2014.
    1. Feng G, et al. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 2000;28:41–51. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00084-2.
    1. Burkholder TJ, Fingado B, Baron S, Lieber RL. Relationship between muscle fiber types and sizes and muscle architectural properties in the mouse hindlimb. Journal of Morphology. 1994;221:177–190. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1052210207.
    1. Buller AJ, Eccles JC, Eccles RM. Interactions between motoneurones and muscles in respect of the characteristic speeds of their responses. The Journal of physiology. 1960;150:417–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006395.
    1. Simon AM, Hoppe P, Burden SJ. Spatial restriction of AChR gene expression to subsynaptic nuclei. Development (Cambridge, England) 1992;114:545–553.
    1. Jang YC, et al. Increased superoxide in vivo accelerates age-associated muscle atrophy through mitochondrial dysfunction and neuromuscular junction degeneration. The FASEB Journal. 2010;24:1376–1390. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-146308.
    1. Cadot B, et al. Nuclear movement during myotube formation is microtubule and dynein dependent and is regulated by Cdc42, Par6 and Par3. EMBO reports. 2012;13:741–749. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.89.
    1. Rochard P, et al. Mitochondrial activity is involved in the regulation of myoblast differentiation through myogenin expression and activity of myogenic factors. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275:2733–2744. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2733.
    1. Moyes CD, Mathieu-Costello OA, Tsuchiya N, Filburn C, Hansford RG. Mitochondrial biogenesis during cellular differentiation. The American journal of physiology. 1997;272:C1345–1351. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1997.272.4.C1345.
    1. Remels AH, et al. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis during myogenesis. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2010;315:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.09.029.
    1. Duguez S, Feasson L, Denis C, Freyssenet D. Mitochondrial biogenesis during skeletal muscle regeneration. American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2002;282:E802–809. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00343.2001.
    1. Boengler K, Heusch G, Schulz R. Nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins and their role in cardioprotection. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2011;1813:1286–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.009.
    1. Pham AH, McCaffery JM, Chan DC. Mouse lines with photo-activatable mitochondria to study mitochondrial dynamics. Genesis. 2012;50:833–843. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22050.
    1. Mishra P, Varuzhanyan G, Pham AH, Chan DC. Mitochondrial dynamics is a distinguishing feature of skeletal muscle fiber types and regulates organellar compartmentalization. Cell metabolism. 2015;22:1033–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.027.
    1. Wu H, et al. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle by CaMK. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2002;296:349–352. doi: 10.1126/science.1071163.
    1. Quiros PM, Goyal A, Jha P, Auwerx J. Analysis of mtDNA/nDNA Ratio in Mice. Current protocols in mouse biology. 2017;7:47–54. doi: 10.1002/cpmo.21.
    1. Rooney JP, et al. PCR based determination of mitochondrial DNA copy number in multiple species. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2015;1241:23–38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1875-1_3.
    1. Taanman J-W. The mitochondrial genome: structure, transcription, translation and replication. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 1999;1410:103–123. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00161-3.
    1. Sun N, et al. A fluorescence-based imaging method to measure in vitro and in vivo mitophagy using mt-Keima. Nature protocols. 2017;12:1576–1587. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.060.
    1. Meeusen S, et al. Mitochondrial inner-membrane fusion and crista maintenance requires the dynamin-related GTPase Mgm1. Cell. 2006;127:383–395. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021.
    1. Song Z, Ghochani M, McCaffery JM, Frey TG, Chan DC. Mitofusins and OPA1 mediate sequential steps in mitochondrial membrane fusion. Molecular biology of the cell. 2009;20:3525–3532. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-03-0252.
    1. Frezza C, et al. OPA1 controls apoptotic cristae remodeling independently from mitochondrial fusion. Cell. 2006;126:177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.025.
    1. Ishihara N, Fujita Y, Oka T, Mihara K. Regulation of mitochondrial morphology through proteolytic cleavage of OPA1. The EMBO journal. 2006;25:2966–2977. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601184.
    1. DeVay RM, et al. Coassembly of Mgm1 isoforms requires cardiolipin and mediates mitochondrial inner membrane fusion. The Journal of cell biology. 2009;186:793–803. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200906098.
    1. Song Z, Chen H, Fiket M, Alexander C, Chan DC. OPA1 processing controls mitochondrial fusion and is regulated by mRNA splicing, membrane potential, and Yme1L. The Journal of cell biology. 2007;178:749–755. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200704110.
    1. Merkwirth C, et al. Prohibitins control cell proliferation and apoptosis by regulating OPA1-dependent cristae morphogenesis in mitochondria. Genes & development. 2008;22:476–488. doi: 10.1101/gad.460708.
    1. Kathiria AS, et al. Prohibitin 1 Modulates Mitochondrial Stress-Related Autophagy in Human Colonic Epithelial Cells. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e31231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031231.
    1. Norton M, et al. ROMO1 is an essential redox-dependent regulator of mitochondrial dynamics. Science signaling. 2014;7:ra10. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004374.
    1. Pipinos II, et al. Mitochondrial defects and oxidative damage in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Free radical biology & medicine. 2006;41:262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.04.003.
    1. Yamada T, et al. Interaction between myoglobin and mitochondria in rat skeletal muscle. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 2013;114:490–497. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2012.
    1. Miranda S, Foncea R, Guerrero J, Leighton F. Oxidative Stress and Upregulation of Mitochondrial Biogenesis Genes in Mitochondrial DNA-Depleted HeLa Cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1999;258:44–49. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0580.
    1. Twig G, et al. Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. The EMBO journal. 2008;27:433–446. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601963.
    1. Pipinos II, et al. Abnormal mitochondrial respiration in skeletal muscle in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2003;38:827–832. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00602-5.
    1. Liu W, et al. Hypoxia promotes satellite cell self-renewal and enhances the efficiency of myoblast transplantation. Development (Cambridge, England) 2012;139:2857–2865. doi: 10.1242/dev.079665.
    1. Berendse M, Grounds MD, Lloyd CM. Myoblast structure affects subsequent skeletal myotube morphology and sarcomere assembly. Experimental cell research. 2003;291:435–450. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.07.004.
    1. LeBleu VS, et al. PGC-1alpha mediates mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in cancer cells to promote metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(992–1003):1001–1015. doi: 10.1038/ncb3039.
    1. Jager S, Handschin C, St-Pierre J, Spiegelman BM. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) action in skeletal muscle via direct phosphorylation of PGC-1alpha. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:12017–12022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705070104.
    1. Canto C, et al. AMPK regulates energy expenditure by modulating NAD+ metabolism and SIRT1 activity. Nature. 2009;458:1056–1060. doi: 10.1038/nature07813.
    1. Fusaro G, Dasgupta P, Rastogi S, Joshi B, Chellappan S. Prohibitin induces the transcriptional activity of p53 and is exported from the nucleus upon apoptotic signaling. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:47853–47861. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305171200.
    1. Kasashima K, Ohta E, Kagawa Y, Endo H. Mitochondrial functions and estrogen receptor-dependent nuclear translocation of pleiotropic human prohibitin 2. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281:36401–36410. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605260200.
    1. Marinho HS, Real C, Cyrne L, Soares H, Antunes F. Hydrogen peroxide sensing, signaling and regulation of transcription factors. Redox Biology. 2014;2:535–562. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.02.006.
    1. Muller, F. L., Liu, Y. & Van Remmen, H. Complex III releases superoxide to both sides of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Journal of Biological Chemistry (2004).
    1. Ryan, T. E. et al. Mitochondrial Regulation of the Muscle Microenvironment in Critical Limb Ischemia. Frontiers in Physiology6, 10.3389/fphys.2015.00336 (2015).
    1. Helisch A, et al. Impact of mouse strain differences in innate hindlimb collateral vasculature. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2006;26:520–526. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000202677.55012.a0.
    1. McClung JM, et al. Skeletal muscle-specific genetic determinants contribute to the differential strain-dependent effects of hindlimb ischemia in mice. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:2156–2169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.01.032.
    1. Schmidt CA, et al. Diminished force production and mitochondrial respiratory deficits are strain-dependent myopathies of subacute limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:1504–1514.e1511. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.041.
    1. Grounds MD, McGeachie JK. A comparison of muscle precursor replication in crush-injured skeletal muscle of Swiss and BALBc mice. Cell and tissue research. 1989;255:385–391. doi: 10.1007/BF00224122.
    1. Sun N, et al. Measuring In Vivo Mitophagy. Molecular Cell. 2015;60:685–696. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.009.
    1. Chakkalakal JV, Kuang S, Buffelli M, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Mouse transgenic lines that selectively label type I, type IIa, and types IIX + B skeletal muscle fibers. genesis. 2012;50:50–58. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20794.
    1. Couffinhal T, et al. Mouse model of angiogenesis. The American Journal of Pathology. 1998;152:1667–1679.
    1. Anderson SE, et al. Determination of a Critical Size Threshold for Volumetric Muscle Loss in the Mouse Quadriceps. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2019;25:59–70. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2018.0324.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다