Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of teicoplanin in patients with MRSA infections

Kazuaki Matsumoto, Erika Watanabe, Naoko Kanazawa, Tomohide Fukamizu, Akari Shigemi, Yuta Yokoyama, Kazuro Ikawa, Norifumi Morikawa, Yasuo Takeda, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Erika Watanabe, Naoko Kanazawa, Tomohide Fukamizu, Akari Shigemi, Yuta Yokoyama, Kazuro Ikawa, Norifumi Morikawa, Yasuo Takeda

Abstract

Background: Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that has been used to treat serious, invasive infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. The area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was identified as a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameter of glycopeptide antibiotics that correlated with bacteriological responses and clinical outcomes. Although optimized dosing regimens based on PK-PD are needed, a PK-PD analysis of teicoplanin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has not yet been performed. Thus, this study examined patients with MRSA infections, who were administered with teicoplanin in order to determine the target AUC/MIC ratio.

Methods: This study retrospectively assessed data obtained as part of our routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of teicoplanin therapy in 46 patients with MRSA infections at Kagoshima University Hospital. Serum concentrations of teicoplanin were determined using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay system and used for a Bayesian PK estimation to estimate AUC for 24 hours (AUC24). The MIC value for teicoplanin was determined using a standardized agar dilution method. The effects of teicoplanin were evaluated in terms of bacteriological responses by a quantitative assessment.

Results: The estimated AUC24/MIC ratios with and without bacteriological responses were 926.6±425.2 µg·h/mL (n=34) and 642.2±193.9 µg·h/mL, respectively (n=12; P<0.05). On the basis of a logistic regression analysis, AUC24/MIC ratios of 500 µg·h/mL, 700 µg·h/mL, and 900 µg·h/mL gave probabilities of treatment success of 0.50, 0.72, and 0.87, respectively. Furthermore, using the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, an AUC24/MIC ratio of ≥900 led to a significantly stronger bacteriological response than an AUC24/MIC ratio of <900.

Conclusion: These results suggest that an AUC24/MIC ratio of ≥900 µg·h/mL is required to ensure a sufficient bacteriological response.

Keywords: AUC/MIC; MRSA; PK/PD; teicoplanin.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Teicoplanin AUC24/MIC ratio and logistic regression model for bacteriological responses (failure, 0; success, 1). Abbreviations: AUC24, area under the concentration–time curve for 24 hours; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier plot showing the time from the initiation of teicoplanin therapy to efficacy rates between the AUC24/MIC ratios of ≥900 (n=15) and <900 (n=31). Abbreviations: AUC24, area under the concentration–time curve for 24 hours; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.

References

    1. Scaglione F. Can PK/PD be used in everyday clinical practice. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002;19:349–353.
    1. Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1–10.
    1. Wilson AP, Grüneberg RN, Neu H. A critical review of the dosage of teicoplanin in Europe and the USA. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1994;4(Suppl 1):1–30.
    1. Kuti JL, Kiffer CR, Mendes CM, Nicolau DP. Pharmacodynamic comparison of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected from hospitals in Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:116–123.
    1. Craig WA. Basic pharmacodynamics of antibacterials with clinical applications to the use of beta-lactams, glycopeptides, and linezolid. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2003;17:479–501.
    1. Matsumoto K, Takesue Y, Ohmagari N, et al. Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19:365–380.
    1. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:82–98.
    1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.
    1. Nakayama K, Gemma H, Kaibara A, Niwa T. Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in adult patients. Jpn J Chemother. 2006;54:1–6.
    1. Wikler MA, Hindler JF, Cockerill FR, et al. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard. 8th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne, PA, USA: 2009. Document M7-A8.
    1. Matsumoto K, Kanazawa N, Ikawa K, et al. Determination of teicoplanin trough concentration target and appropriate total dose during the first 3 days: a retrospective study in patients with MRSA infections. J Infect Chemother. 2010;16:193–199.
    1. Hagihara M, Umemura T, Kimura M, Mori T, Hasegawa T, Mikamo H. Exploration of optimal teicoplanin dosage based on pharmacokinetic parameters for the treatment of intensive care unit patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18:10–16.
    1. Kanazawa N, Matsumoto K, Ikawa K, et al. An initial dosing method for teicoplanin based on the area under the serum concentration time curve required for MRSA eradication. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17:297–300.
    1. Ogawa R, Kobayashi S, Sasaki Y, Makimura M, Echizen H. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of teicoplanin in Japanese patients with systemic MRSA infection. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;51:357–366.
    1. Tam VH, McKinnon PS, Akins RL, Rybak MJ, Drusano GL. Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:425–428.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다