A phase 2 and biomarker study of cabozantinib in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma

Lipika Goyal, Hui Zheng, Matthew B Yurgelun, Thomas A Abrams, Jill N Allen, James M Cleary, Michelle Knowles, Eileen Regan, Amanda Reardon, Anna Khachatryan, Rakesh K Jain, Valentina Nardi, Darrell R Borger, Dan G Duda, Andrew X Zhu, Lipika Goyal, Hui Zheng, Matthew B Yurgelun, Thomas A Abrams, Jill N Allen, James M Cleary, Michelle Knowles, Eileen Regan, Amanda Reardon, Anna Khachatryan, Rakesh K Jain, Valentina Nardi, Darrell R Borger, Dan G Duda, Andrew X Zhu

Abstract

Background: Advanced cholangiocarcinoma carries a poor prognosis, and no standard treatment exists beyond first-line gemcitabine/platinum-based chemotherapy. A single-arm, phase 2 and biomarker study of cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor with potent activity against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and MET, was performed for patients with advanced refractory cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods: Previously treated patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma received cabozantinib (60 mg orally and daily on a continuous schedule). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor MET expression and plasma biomarkers were evaluated.

Results: The study enrolled 19 patients with cholangiocarcinoma (female, 68%; median age, 67 years; intrahepatic vs extrahepatic, 84% vs 16%). The median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval, 1.6-5.4 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.7-10.5 months). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 89% of the patients and included neutropenia (5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5%), epistaxis (5%), bowel perforation (5%), enterocutaneous fistulas (5%), and hypertension (11%). One patient with 3 + MET expression in the tumor stayed on treatment for 278 days, but the MET expression did not correlate with the outcomes in the overall study population. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor, placental growth factor, and stromal cell-derived factor 1α increased and soluble VEGFR2 and angiopoietin 2 decreased after treatment (all P values < .01). Plasma tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 was inversely correlated with PFS, and soluble MET (sMET) and interleukin 6 were inversely correlated with OS.

Conclusions: In unselected patients with cholangiocarcinoma, cabozantinib demonstrated limited activity and significant toxicity. In the first clinical trial to assess the role of MET inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma, 1 patient with a MET-high tumor had a prolonged benefit from treatment. Baseline plasma soluble MET was associated with OS. Any further development of this drug in cholangiocarcinoma should include a dose reduction and a biomarker-driven approach. Cancer 2017;123:1979-1988. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01954745.

Keywords: cabozantinib; cholangiocarcinoma; phase 2; soluble MET; vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2).

Conflict of interest statement

All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2017 American Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Levels of total MET protein were evaluated in patient archived pre-treatment FFPE tumor tissue. Shown are representative photomicrographs captured using a 40X objective across the IHC scores of A) 0 (study ID #3), B) 1+ (study ID #11), C) 2+ (study ID #14) and D) 3+ (study ID #5).
Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Levels of total MET protein were evaluated in patient archived pre-treatment FFPE tumor tissue. Shown are representative photomicrographs captured using a 40X objective across the IHC scores of A) 0 (study ID #3), B) 1+ (study ID #11), C) 2+ (study ID #14) and D) 3+ (study ID #5).
Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Levels of total MET protein were evaluated in patient archived pre-treatment FFPE tumor tissue. Shown are representative photomicrographs captured using a 40X objective across the IHC scores of A) 0 (study ID #3), B) 1+ (study ID #11), C) 2+ (study ID #14) and D) 3+ (study ID #5).
Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Figure 1. Total MET immunohistochemistry
Levels of total MET protein were evaluated in patient archived pre-treatment FFPE tumor tissue. Shown are representative photomicrographs captured using a 40X objective across the IHC scores of A) 0 (study ID #3), B) 1+ (study ID #11), C) 2+ (study ID #14) and D) 3+ (study ID #5).

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다