Genomic aberrations in the FGFR pathway: opportunities for targeted therapies in solid tumors

R Dienstmann, J Rodon, A Prat, J Perez-Garcia, B Adamo, E Felip, J Cortes, A J Iafrate, P Nuciforo, J Tabernero, R Dienstmann, J Rodon, A Prat, J Perez-Garcia, B Adamo, E Felip, J Cortes, A J Iafrate, P Nuciforo, J Tabernero

Abstract

The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) cascade plays crucial roles in tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, migration and survival. Accumulating evidence suggests that in some tumor types, FGFRs are bona fide oncogenes to which cancer cells are addicted. Because FGFR inhibition can reduce proliferation and induce cell death in a variety of in vitro and in vivo tumor models harboring FGFR aberrations, a growing number of research groups have selected FGFRs as targets for anticancer drug development. Multikinase FGFR/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors have shown promising activity in breast cancer patients with FGFR1 and/or FGF3 amplification. Early clinical trials with selective FGFR inhibitors, which may overcome the toxicity constraints raised by multitarget kinase inhibition, are recruiting patients with known FGFR(1-4) status based on genomic screens. Preliminary signs of antitumor activity have been demonstrated in some tumor types, including squamous cell lung carcinomas. Rational combination of targeted therapies is expected to further increase the efficacy of selective FGFR inhibitors. Herein, we discuss unsolved questions in the clinical development of these agents and suggest guidelines for management of hyperphosphatemia, a class-specific mechanism-based toxicity. In addition, we propose standardized definitions for FGFR1 and FGFR2 gene amplification based on in situ hybridization methods. Extended access to next-generation sequencing platforms will facilitate the identification of diseases in which somatic FGFR(1-4) mutations, amplifications and fusions are potentially driving cancer cell viability, further strengthening the role of FGFR signaling in cancer biology and providing more possibilities for the therapeutic application of FGFR inhibitors.

Keywords: amplification; cancer; fibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR; hyperphosphatemia; oncogene; targeted therapy.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relative expression of the FGFR(1–4) genes across the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer. Gene expression data and subtype calls have been obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer microarray-based dataset (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/). P-values have been obtained by comparing the mean expression across the groups (ANOVA test).

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다